Advanced Search Results

Sylvania and Luxman Ltd. Vs. Raminder Singh and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 1 (3) and (4) and 2; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1995; Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Provincial Small Causes Courts (Amendment) Act, 1994; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Cantonment's (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC454

1 as follows :'(e) Every Cantonment in Uttar Pradesh declared to be Cantonment under Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924).'Consequently, it is clear that Act No. 13 of 1972 became applicable to all the cantonment … 1996(1) ARC 97 ; Food Corporation of India and another a. M/S. Durga Shakti Enterprises, 1996 (1) ARC 153 and Jonson and Nicholson (India) Ltd., Ghaziabad v. 1st Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad and others, 1996 (2) ARC

Delhi Development Authority vs.engineering & Industrial Corporatio ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

area under the provisions of the Punjab Municipality Act, 1911 or a Cantonment under the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924” or “areas held and occupied for public purpose or a work of public utility and declared as such … On 9th July, 2018, after hearing the counsels, the following order was passed:-"“1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 26th July, 2008

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924), means the State Government. 157. The submission of Mr. Chidambaram is that assuming everything under … reference does not mean that the competent authority had knowledge and with all details about the court proceedings. 153. In relation to the document at serial number 46, that is also a letter from respondent no. 6(b).

The City Municipality Vs. Nusserwanji Hormusji Madon

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationMunicipal Tax

Reported in : AIR1940Bom252; (1940)42BOMLR491

higher assessment. Nothing happened for four years. Thereafter the Collector on behalf of the Court of Wards, under Section 153 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, issued a notice asking the plaintiffs to pay the arrears of increased … for India v. Major Hughes I.L.R. (1913) 38 Bom. 293. In that case taxes were levied by the cantonment authorities and payment was made under protest. When the suit was filed to recover the amount on the … Both the lower Courts held that Article 96 of the Indian Limitation Act applied, and as the mistake became known on December 1, 1931, allowed

Sorrells Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

been "on his job continuously without missing a pay day since March, 1924." Witness identified the timesheet showing this employment. This witness and three others … L.ed. 995; Carlisle v. United States, 16 Wall. 147, 83 U. S. 153 ; Oates v. National Bank, 100 U. S. 239 ; Chew Heong … a time in Haywood County, North Carolina, where he posed as a tourist, he visited defendant's home near Canton on Sunday, July 13, 1930, accompanied by three residents of the county who knew the defendant well. He … unjust, another construction should be adopted if possible. P. 287 U. S. 446 . 2. The National Prohibition Act, though denouncing generally as criminal the sale of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, was Page 287 U. S.

Sri Somashekar vs Smt.Sunanda

Court : Karnataka

evidentiary value of the entries in the GLR in the context of the history and scope of the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 and tried to establish that no reliance could be placed … value of the entries in the GLR in the context of the history and scope of the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 and tried to establish that no reliance could be placed on the … Vishwanath and Ors., reported in - 21 - 2023 SCC OnLine Kar 153. The relevant portion is reproduced as under:-“14. An attempt is made on … (BY SRI ANDANAPPA GURAPPA BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE) -2- THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH UNDERORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., CALL FOR RECORDS,

Laird Vs. Tatum

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

without notice to its civilian superiors, overstepped its mission. From 1917 to 1924, the Corps of Intelligence Police maintained a massive surveillance of civilian political … borders." Privacy and Government Investigations, 1971 U.Ill.L.F. 137, 153. II The claim that respondents have no standing … U.S.C. § 1384: "Within such reasonable distance of any military or naval camp, station, fort, post, yard, base, cantonment, training or mobilization place as the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of … 1968, Army Intelligence established a data-gathering system, which respondents describe as involving the "surveillance of lawful civilian political activity." Held: Respondents' claim that their First Amendment rights are chilled due to the mere existence of this data-gathering … and other domestic violence if and when the conditions described in that section obtain within one of the States. Pursuant to those provisions, President Johnson