Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 143 · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 07 2007

Ram NaraIn Son of Sunder Lal, Vs. Sub Divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC35

notified area under the provisions of the U.P. Municipality Act-1916 or a Cantonment under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924 or a Town area … area under the provisions of the U.P. Municipality Act-1916 or a Cantonment under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924 or a Town area under the provisions of the U.P. Town Area Act-1914 as contemplated by Section 1(2) … dated 10th June 1984 executed by Ajendra and Akshay, thereafter they also, as abundant caution, obtained declaration under Section 143 of the Act that the land had ceased to be agricultural holding. A true copy of the aforesaid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2003

Amritsar Contonment Board Vs. Kuldip Chand and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-13-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Contonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2004P& H43; (2003)135PLR307

owners of the kothi together with the out-houses. The term 'Occupier' is defined in Section 2(xxiii) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 which reads as follows:-'2. (xxiii). 'Occupier' includes an owner in occupation of, or otherwise using his own land … against the judgment of Mr. Iqbal Singh, Addl. Distt. Judge, Amritsar dated 6.4.1979 rendered in Civil Appeal No. 143 of 1977.2. The respondents had filed suit, before Mr. P.S. Bajaj, PCS, Sub Judge, 2nd Class, Amritsar for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2005

P.D. Tandon Vs. Military Estate Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-27-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Land Holding Ceiling Act, 1932; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 181; Evidence Act - Sections 116; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 92 - Order 35, Rule 5; Religious Endowments Act, 1863 - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3514

petitioner, P. D. Tandon, and pertain to the same property covered by Survey No. 143 situate in Old Cantonment, Allahabad. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13353 of 1992 was decided by a Division Bench of this Court … India.13. The application filed by the petitioner for sanction of the map under Section 181 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 was rejected by the competent authority by order dated 14.3.2002 on the ground that the petitioner is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 19 2003

Purshottam Das Tandon Vs. Military Estate Officer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 181

Reported in : JT2003(10)SC268; 2003(10)SCALE87; (2004)1SCC559

of 2001 filed an application before the competent authority for sanction of map under Section 181 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. His application was rejected by the competent authority on 14.3.2002, aggrieved against which he filed Civil Misc. Writ … contradiction or inconsistency.Facts in Civil Appeal No. 7284 of 20012. The property in dispute situate in Survey No. 143, Old Cantonment, Allahabad was put to auction in execution of a decree against the judgment debtors-Scott and Spencer.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2014

Purshottam Das Tandon Dead by Lrs.and anr. Vs. Military Estate Officer ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-13-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the appellant had also filed an application before the competent authority under Section 181 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 for sanction of plans for raising further additional construction on the land. The said application was rejected on … the order under challenge.3. The suit property is Bungalow No.29, Chaitham Lines, Allahabad covered by Survey No.143, Old Cantonment, Allahabad. There is no dispute that late Lala Manohar Lal grandfather of the present appellant had purchased the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1989

Dinesh Kumar Jaiswal and anr. Vs. the Collector, Jabalpur and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-19-1989

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Public Tursts, 1951 - Sections 2(4), 3, 5, 6 and 10

Reported in : AIR1990MP250; 1989MPLJ840

and 8 acting as 'constituted attorney for respondent No. 6' submitted an application under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, (Annexure 4 R I), to obtain sanction for construction of a non-residential building complex on the property in … suit to set aside the finding and to have the entry corrected.5. Civil Suit vide Spl. C.S. No. 143 of 1967 was filed in the Court of III Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, challenging the finding

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2016

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924), means the State Government. 157. The submission of Mr. Chidambaram is that assuming everything under … excess to the ceiling limit is thus erroneous. The petitioners' arguments overlook this important aspect of the matter. 143. Then, the argument is that the notices dated 10th August, 2006 and 3rd November, 2006 were not served.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2000

Purshottam Das Tandon Vs. Military Estate Officer

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-07-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 1(2) and 7; Constitution of India - Article 226; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 2, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR2000All127; (2000)1UPLBEC738

casts a duty on the Military Estate Officer to maintain General Land Register of all lands in the Cantonments; Sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 states that no addition or alteration shall be made in General Land Register … and the Cantonment Act, 1910; with effect from 1924, the entire Cantonment matters are governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Government of India has framed a number of Rules in order to manage the properties of the … name as 'Private Owner' of 'Bungalow No. 29, Chaitham Lines, Survey No. 143, Old Cantonment Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as the Bungalow) and (ii) accept … Rule 5 of C.P.C. as alleged by the defendant?(3) Whether notice under Section 80, C.P.C. served upon the defendant No. 2 is legal and valid.(4)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1996

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. State of Punjab, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 54, 133, 142, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 ot 255, 256 to 263, 285, 289(1), 357, 367 and 372; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 61; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 - Sections 60, 62 and 119; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 5, 6, 94, 99, 100, 104, 154, 155(1) and 311(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Government of India Act, 1919; Government of Part C States Act, 1951 - Sections 21, 22 and 38(22); Reorganisation Act, 1956; Union Territory by the Punjab (Reorganisation) Act, 1966; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970; North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Ac

Reported in : AIR1997SC2847; JT1997(1)SC40; 1996(9)SCALE613; (1997)7SCC339; [1996]Supp10SCR472

on Property, such as, in the case of Entry 3, List I which deals with Cantonments and the Cantonments Act, 1924 which allows Parliament to levy taxes for Contonments. Mr. Sen then contended that such a power would be … and, in view of the resulting controversy, the President referred, under Article 143, the issue of the constitutionality of the proposed amendments to this Court. … the 1st day of October, 1912. Schedule-A to the Act defined the 'territory' covered by the new Province. Sections 2 and 3 of the 1912 Act provided inter alia that the creation of the new Province of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2002

Perambaduru Murali Krishna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 33; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1996 - Rule 22(2)

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD597; 2003(1)ALT127

rule inconsistent with Section 33 - held, block reservation in favour of persons with disabilities was void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924; a State Government or any of its establishments, wholly or substantially financed by it; and the local authorities … Schedule of the Constitution.19. In Ref. By President of India under Article 143(1), : [1960]3SCR250 , the Supreme Court observed:'Entry 14 in List I of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial