Advanced Search Results

Baljit Singh Bedi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(2)BLJR1554; [2003(3)JCR312(Jhr)]

the Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 framed in exercise of the power under Section 280 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Military Estate Officer of the Cantonment shall prepare and maintain General Land Register of all lands in … 1951 and numbered as Class A1 and A2 and G.L.R. Survey No. 142 and 142/1. The area of G.L.R. Survey No. 142 under Class A2 … in the Khatiyan and the said land has not been settled by the Government in favour of Ramgarh Cantonment Board and as such Executive Officer of Ramgarh Cantonment Board has got no right to auction Keshare Hind

Cantonment Board, Mathura Vs. Krishna Bricks and Lime Factory

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 128(1); Constitution of India- Article 276 and 276(2)

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)80; JT1996(8)SC180; 1996(6)SCALE510; (1996)6SCC72; [1996]Supp6SCR135; (1997)1UPLBEC53

of the tax at the aforesaid rate was in contravention and in violation of Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 read with Section 128(1)(ii) of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. The suit filed on behalf of the respondent … judgment said:Before we deal with these cases it is necessary to point out the rational upon which Section 142-A of the Govt. of India Act, 1935 was enacted and on which Article 276 of the Constitution now

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Chief Commissioner of I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as Municipality 11 defined in section 389 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924); Section 10(20A):Omitted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.2002 “10(20A) any income of an authority … dismissing the writ petition filled by the appellant challenging the notices issued by the Income Tax Authority under Section 142 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as well as the judgment dated 04.11.2011 rejecting the review application.2. The

Kunj Bihari Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate Ii and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 63, 82, 83, 84, 84(2), 85, 86, 87, 88, 92A, 116, 117 and 259; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1983; National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 4 to 7; National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 - Sections 15; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 397(1) and 398; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 301, 302, 303 and 305; Constitution of India (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1363(UHC); (2005)2UPLBEC41

Procedure, 1973. There is yet another preliminary objection raised in the counter-affidavit that under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Act No. 2 of 1924), the remedy of appeal was available to the petitioner against the levy of

Chotanagpur Motor Kamgar Union Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 108; Cantonment Rules, 1925 - Rule 6

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR140(Jhr)]

preliminary objection of maintainability of writ petition at the instance of the petitioner, referred Section 117(b) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 wherein the Cantonment Board have been empowered to construct, establish or maintain public parks, gardens, offices, diaries, bathing … Puram, New Delhi 110066Subject : Reclassification of land at Ramgarh. Cantt, Measuring 2.96 acres out of Sy. No. 142 (Camping Ground)SirI am directed to convey the sanction of the President to the adoption of the following measures

Ram Pratap and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 6, 9, 9(3) and 17; Uttar Pradesh Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976; Cantonment Act, 1924

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2049; (1999)2UPLBEC1452

exactness, it should be left to the military and the local body, the Cantonment, functioning under the Cantonment Act. 1924. Suffice it to say that the park may be expanded beyond the Macpherson Park and around the Macpherson … Officer (NagarMahapalika). Allahabad. (4)Allahabad Development Authority,through its Chairman, (5) Ministry ofDefence, through its Secretary, (6)Sub-Area Commander, Allahabad and(7) Cantonment Board. Allahabad.The petitioners contend, all of them.that they are Bhumidhars inpossession. The petitioner Nos. 1. 2and 3 contend … village. Theycontend it was only on 17 January,1988, when a notice under Section 9(3) of the Act had been left in thevillage but not served

The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Urban Improvement Trust

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);” 15. By Finance Act, 2002, provisions of Section 10(20A) was also deleted. Section 10(20A) as … Improvement Trust, Kota.4. Section 10(20) has been amended by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 01.04.2003. A Notice under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “I.T. Act”) was issued dated 01.08.2005 requiring the

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Azadpur Vs. Cit and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Del)1; [2007]294ITR549(Delhi)

or management of a Municipal or local fund-, or(iv) Cantonment Board as defined in section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924.8. The most striking feature of the Explanationn is that the same provides an exhaustive meaning to the expression … in terms of section 10(20) of the Act in response to a notice issued to it under sections 142(1) and 1,13(2) of the said Act. The assessing officer repelled the assessed's claim for exemption relying upon Circular

Taramati Nandkishore Sharma Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rule 22 and 22(1); Central Government, Ministry of Defence and Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 280; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 25 and 28; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Regulations - Regulation 71

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ159

in the light of the relevant service regulations and Education Code prevalent in the concerned State where the Cantonments are situated. The contention advanced on behalf of the petitioners cannot be accepted that the circular results in … 22(1) of the Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 (for short, 'Rules'), framed under Section 280 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (for short, 'Act') till the attainment of the age of sixty years so as to push the position … Raj Soni v. Air Officer-in-charge Administration and another; and AIR 1993 SC 142, M. G. Pandke and ors. v. Municipal Council, Hinganghat.8. Shri Verma gave

Alankar theatre Vs. Entertainment Tax Officer, Warangal

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 4(1); Madras Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act, 1926; Madras Entertainments Tax (Andhra Pradesh Extension and Amendment) Act, 1958; Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955

Reported in : [1991]82STC417(AP)

Legislatures to levy 'taxes on luxuries including taxes on entertainments, amusements betting and gambling'. Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, empowered the Board to levy taxes with the previous sanction of the Central Government. It was empowered to … to entry 46 (corresponding to present entry 60) and was, therefore, subject to the ceiling prescribed in section 142-A of the Government of India Act, 1935 (corresponding to article 276 of the Constitution). This argument was rejected