Advanced Search Results

Rama Sundari Devi Vs. Indu Bhusan Bose

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956; ;Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1967Cal355

or allocation of property by the State Government. I have already set out above certain provisions in the Cantonments Act, 1924 which shows that even private houses in cantonment areas were intended to come within the scope of operation … or ventilation, the said buildings or part thereof may be removed in order to abate the unhealthy condition. Section 139 deals with overcrowding of dwelling houses. It provides that, where it appears to a Board that any building

P.S. Sudershan Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD595

Court, Hyderabad, dated 11.2.2003 in C.MA No. 274 of 2001, confirming the order of the Estate Officer of Cantonment Board ordering the petitioner to remove the encroachments in 139 Sq.yards in (General Land Register Survey Number) GLR … true extract of GLR, which is maintained under Land Administration Rules framed under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The Estate Officer placing reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Chief Executive Officer v. Surender … GLR S.No. 317/457. The order of the Estate Officer was passed under Section 5 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (Central

Cantonment Board Vs. Asif Alim Sait and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 256

Reported in : AIR2004Kant158

construction work is carried out, that they will be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924. According to the Board, the owners resorted to the usual ploy of not only carrying out the major … in this as also in several other analogous sections such as Sections 139 and 141, there is no prior notice that is contemplated and if … that they virtually reconstructed it. When this activity came to the notice of the Board, a notice under Section 185 of the Act was served on the owners calling upon them to stop the illegal construction and

Kandiyil Vania Pudukudi Ramunni Kurup and ors. Vs. Panchayat Board, Ba ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madras Village Panchayats Act, 1950 - Sections 81(1), 82(1), 82(2) and 82(3); Madras Local Boards Act, 1884 - Sections 117E(1); Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(5)

Reported in : AIR1954Mad754; (1954)IIMLJ101

of Madras, the municipalities governed by the District Municipalities Act 5 of 1920 and cantonments governed by tfie Cantonments Act of 1924. That is to say, it applies to the whole of the rural areas of the State. … of India and raise the question whether the notification, G. O. No. 139 (L. A.) issued by the Government of Madras on 31-1-1952 is valid. … Government of Madras on 31-1-1952 is valid. That notification is as follows:"In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 81, Sub-section (1) of the Madras Village Panchayats Act, 1950 (Madras Act 10 of 1950) His Excellency the

Raja Suryapalsingh and ors. Vs. the U.P. Govt.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 4(2), 27, 113 and 114; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1), 25, 25(1), 26, 31, 31(2), 31(4), 245, 246 and 294; ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6; Govt. of India Act - Sections 299; ; Crown Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Constitutional Law; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1951All674

to membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the … membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the United Provinces … what is to be seen on the face of the enactment itself.' 139. In State of Arizona v. State of California et al., 75 Law.

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary to Central Governmen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 3, 4, 13, 77, 78 and 50B; Requisition and Acquisition of Lands Act; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act - Sections 19 and 19(5); Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Tenancy Act - Sections 50B; Land Acquisition Act; Registration Act - Sections 54; Transfer of Property Act; Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317F; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 16 and 31; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD532; 2002(5)ALT370

G.L.R. entries may have to be appreciated in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. The Cantonments Act, 1924 applied only to British India.Hyderabad was a princely State and the provisions of the Cantonments Act do not … 52 of the layout plan situated in Survey No.61 and plot Nos.183, 139, 140 and 141 of the layout plan situated in Survey No.60/1. Aggrieved … parties. The Tahsildar validated the said alienation and sale certificates dated 18-4-1972 were issued to the purchasers under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The remaining land was partitioned

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

directed the Union government to take “appropriate measures” and “issue directions, to all statutory bodies, including corporations, railways, cantonments, as well as agencies under its control, to ensure that manual sewer cleaning is completely eradicated in a … stated: “There has been a persistent demand in the Central Legislature in recent years that the Criminal Tribes Act, 1924, should be repealed as its provisions which seek to classify particular classes of people as Criminal Tribes, are … 4, Criminal Tribes Act, 1871. 138 Section 4, Criminal Tribes Act, 1871. 139 Section 5, Criminal Tribes Act, 1871. 61 PART XI of the provisions … In Shayara Bano v. Union of India,47 in testing the validity of Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 which validates

Dinesh Kumar Jaiswal and anr. Vs. the Collector, Jabalpur and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Public Tursts, 1951 - Sections 2(4), 3, 5, 6 and 10

Reported in : AIR1990MP250; 1989MPLJ840

and 8 acting as 'constituted attorney for respondent No. 6' submitted an application under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, (Annexure 4 R I), to obtain sanction for construction of a non-residential building complex on the property in … Trusts Bill, 1951 (22 of 1951) was published in the M.P. Gazette (Extra ordinary) dated 24-3-1951 at page 139. The Select Committee assigned reasons for redrafting Clause 3 of the Bill as under :'We think that the

Railway Express Agency, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court's decisions sustain the application of a fairly apportioned general gross receipts tax to an interstate transportation company. Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 , 340 U. S. 515 -516; Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. … ] Railway Express Agency v. Virginia, 347 U. S. 359 (1954). Subsequently, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Act here involved, levying a "franchise tax" on express companies, measured by gross receipts from operations within Virginia, in … property tax, and in fact the rate, as established by the latter section, has been used before the "in lieu" provision as a basis for

Smt. Penumatcha Subhadrayyamma Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Eas ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 23 and 28; Madras Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1963AP466

its possibilities in the future'.In Govt. of Bombay v. Ismail Ahmed, AIR 1924 Bom 362, Mullah, J. followed the decision in AIR 1922 Bom 399 … heading 'Compensation on Basis other than Existing Use (i) Reinstatement.' At p. 139, the following passage occurs:'When the land is used for some particular purpose … AIR 1939 PC 235. An analysis of the facts clearly shows that the site was situated in a cantonment belonging to the Government. What had to be determined in the case was the value of the buildings … The claimant Penumatcha Subhadrayyamma has preferred Appeal No. 133 of 1959 under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act claiming enhancement of compensation. Appeal No. 201 of 1959 was filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry against