Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 133 · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 17 1980

Vora Saiyedbhai Kadarbhai (a Partnership Firm) Vs. Saiyed Intajam Huss ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-17-1980

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1981)22GLR596

or deemed to be constituted, under the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963;(iii) a contonment declared as such under the Cantonments Act, 1924.Definition of 'rural artisan' clearly discloses that he has hardly anything to do with agriculture. He is a person … Inasmuch as the President did not do so, the impugned Act was not a valid piece of legislation.(3) Section 14 of the impugned Act is violative of Articles 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g) and 31 of the Constitution and is … the State of Gujarat-respondent No. 4-applies for certificate of fitness under Article 133(1) of the Constitution in order to enable the State of Gujarat to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2020

The Mulloor Rural Co-Op. Society Ltd. vs Thirupuram Grama Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-10-2020

governing Municipalities in the State or any tax of the nature of a profession tax imposed under the Cantonments Act, 1924, for the same half year to any Panchayat or Nagar Panchayat or Municipal Council or Municipal Corporation or … ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP RESPONDENT: THIRUPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, THIRUPURAM P.O., PIN-695 133, THIRUVANANTHAUPRAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION … that, though the panchayat has resorted to revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner, no amount has been realised.6. Section 204 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 provides for levy of profession tax. Section 204 eads as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1951

Raja Suryapalsingh and ors. Vs. the U.P. Govt.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-1951

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 4(2), 27, 113 and 114; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1), 25, 25(1), 26, 31, 31(2), 31(4), 245, 246 and 294; ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6; Govt. of India Act - Sections 299; ; Crown Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Constitutional Law; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1951All674

to membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the … membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the United Provinces … United Provinces v. Atiqa Begum, (1940) F. C. R. 110 at p. 133 'that within their own sphere the powers of Indian Legislatures are as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 13 1946

NaraIn Sahai and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-1946

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All333

Counsel who supports the reference has contended. I would, therefore, reject the reference.42. The reference is rejected. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ('11) 11 I.C. 588 and of the Lahore High Court in Emperor v. Abdul Aziz ('24) 11 A.I.R. 1924 Lah. 262. The Lahore High Court in Harnam v. Emperor ('25) 12 A.I.R. 1925 Lah. 228, adopted the … that Court in Sardar Khan v. Emperor ('37) 24 A.I.R. 1937 Lah. 133 and were disapproved. It was held by the Division Bench that a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary to Central Governmen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 3, 4, 13, 77, 78 and 50B; Requisition and Acquisition of Lands Act; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act - Sections 19 and 19(5); Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Tenancy Act - Sections 50B; Land Acquisition Act; Registration Act - Sections 54; Transfer of Property Act; Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317F; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 16 and 31; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD532; 2002(5)ALT370

G.L.R. entries may have to be appreciated in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. The Cantonments Act, 1924 applied only to British India.Hyderabad was a princely State and the provisions of the Cantonments Act do not … parties. The Tahsildar validated the said alienation and sale certificates dated 18-4-1972 were issued to the purchasers under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The remaining land was partitioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1924

Nur Mahomed Beg Mahomed Vs. G. Monteath

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-18-1924

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1925)27BOMLR56

with is one of 1923 and accordingly was passed by what may be styled Popular Assemblies. Similarly the Cantonments Act now regulating the cantonments generally is not an old Act, but is a recent Act.8. Turning then to … common ground that he actually lived in the house for a day or two in April and May, 1924, and it was alleged by the plaintiff that extensive repairs to the hense had been made by him … Arlidge [1915] A. C. 120, where Lord Haldane at pp. 132 and 133 indicated the limited interference which the English Courts in certain cases would … that the cantonment authorities had no jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 7 of the Act, requiring him to vacate and to execute a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1971

Smt. Sahodara Devi and ors. Vs. Government of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-1971

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1971SC1599; (1972)3SCC156; [1971]SuppSCR230; 1971(III)LC568(SC)

Act No. 15 of 1910 and Cantonments Code, 1912. These were amended by Cantonments Act No. 2 of 1924 which still continues to be in force. On the 26th June, 1925, Rules were framed for the first … the 26th June, 1925, Rules were framed for the first time under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act of 1924, regulating administration of Cantonment lands. … dated 12th September, 1836. Subsequently, the first Act to be passed in respect of these lands was the Cantonments Act No. 13 of 1889. This was followed by Cantonments Act No. 15 of 1910 and Cantonments Code, 1912. … the appellants have come up to this Court by certificate under Article 133(1)(b) of the Constitution.3. In this appeal, we are concerned with only one

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2024

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2024

Subject : Right to Information

directed the Union government to take “appropriate measures” and “issue directions, to all statutory bodies, including corporations, railways, cantonments, as well as agencies under its control, to ensure that manual sewer cleaning is completely eradicated in a … stated: “There has been a persistent demand in the Central Legislature in recent years that the Criminal Tribes Act, 1924, should be repealed as its provisions which seek to classify particular classes of people as Criminal Tribes, are … Comparative Studies in Society and History 57, No.2 (2015):323. 54, at p.326 133 Section 2, Criminal Tribes Act 1871. 134 Section 1, Criminal Tribes Act, … In Shayara Bano v. Union of India,47 in testing the validity of Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 which validates

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1924

Nur Mahomed Beg Mahomed Vs. G. Monteath District Magistrate

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-1924

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925Bom162; (1925)ILR49Bom152

dealing with is one of 1923 and accordingly was passed by-what may be styled Popular Assemblies. Similarly the Cantonments Act now regulating the Cantonments; generally is not an old Act, but is a recent Act.8. Turning then to … common ground that he actually lived in the house for a day or two in April and May 1924, and it was alleged by the plaintiff that extensive repairs to the house had been made by him … v. Arlidge [1915] A.C. 120 where Lord Haldane at pages 132 and 133 indicated the limited interference which the English Courts in certain cases would … that the Cantonment authorities had no jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 7 of the Act. requiring him to vacate and to execute a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1960

Chandan Lal Joura Vs. AmIn Chand Mohan Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-18-1960

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 118; Evidence Act -Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 11, Rules 18 and 21 - Order 17, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1960P& H500

1915: (AIR 1915 Lah 439); and Karam Chand v. Jinda Ram, AIR 1924 Lah 404.(30) The provisions of O. 17, R. 3, Civil Procedure Code, … Jullundur Electric Supply Co. Ltd., AIR 1955 Punj 133; and Bhupindar Singh v. Chanan Singh, AIR 1950 … defendant No. 3 had revealed the following information. The defendant-firm used to supply to the military at Jullundur Cantonment certain articles on the basis of tender contracts entered into with 'C. R. I. A. S. C.,' Jullundur … of the firm on 13th of May, 1949, as alleged; and(b) whether a sum of Rs. 25,000/- was actually paid to defendant No. 2 or whether the pronote was passed by way of an illegal gratification for … the defendants to rebut the presumption that the pronote was for consideration. Section 118(a) is as under:'Until the contrary is proved, the following presumption shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial