Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 129 · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 03 1976

Jayantilal Kalabhai Mehta Vs. Ratilal Gulabdas Mehta

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-03-1976

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1977)18GLR374

lands levied under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, or the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901, or the Cantonments Act, 1924, or the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1933, as the case may be, is increased after the 31st day … anything contained in Sections 10 and 10A,(a) If in the city of Ahmedabad the general tax levied under Section 129 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, or in any other area to which Clause (I) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1996

Ajay Krishan Shinghal, Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-06-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 5; Delhi Development Act, 1958 - Sections 12(3); Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Sections 3, 4 and 6;

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)644; AIR1996SC2677; 1997(1)CTC156; JT1996(7)SC301; 1996(6)SCALE29; (1996)10SCC721; [1996]Supp4SCR319; 1996(2)LC636(SC)

contention of Shri Lekhi, Learned senior counsel for the appellants, it that the Lands situated within the Delhi Cantonment are governed by the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The land in its jurisdiction is required to … appellants, it that the Lands situated within the Delhi Cantonment are governed by the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The land in its jurisdiction is required to be developed as per the provisions contained in that act … then were, in an elaborate judgment rendered by the later running into 129 pages, considered threadbare two questions of law raised for consideration, namely, the … of law raised for consideration, namely, the validity of the notification under Section 4(1) and declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act 1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2018

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vs.union of India and O ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924)” W.P. (C) No.732/2017 Page 21 of 29 Reliance was placed upon notification issued by the … Punjab versus Bajaj Electricals Limited, [1968]. 70 ITR730(SC), Barendra Prasad Ray and others versus Income Tax Officer, [1981]. 129 ITR295(SC), Commissioner of Income Tax versus Lahore Electric Supply Company Limited, [1966]. 60 ITR1(SC) and State of Gujarat

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 10 1951

Raja Suryapalsingh and ors. Vs. the U.P. Govt.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-1951

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 4(2), 27, 113 and 114; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1), 25, 25(1), 26, 31, 31(2), 31(4), 245, 246 and 294; ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6; Govt. of India Act - Sections 299; ; Crown Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Constitutional Law; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1951All674

to membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the … membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the United Provinces

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1966

Punjab Lime and Lime-stone Co. Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-28-1966

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 116; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 128, 128(1); Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 301, 304, 305, 372 and 366(10)

Reported in : AIR1967All15

O. 369 dated 1st of November, 1963, sanctioning the levy of toll tax under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act. The further prayer is that a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus be issued directing the … costs. (i) Civil - imposition and collection of toll - Sections 30 - 63 and 116 of Cantonment Act, 1924 and Section 128 of U. P. Municipalities Act, 1924 - services rendered by Cantonment Board and tax collected … such taxes restrictions on the power of imposition were provided in Sections 129 and 130 There was nothing either in the Government of India Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1994

Taramati Nandkishore Sharma Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-1994

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rule 22 and 22(1); Central Government, Ministry of Defence and Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 280; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 25 and 28; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Regulations - Regulation 71

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ159

in the light of the relevant service regulations and Education Code prevalent in the concerned State where the Cantonments are situated. The contention advanced on behalf of the petitioners cannot be accepted that the circular results in … 22(1) of the Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 (for short, 'Rules'), framed under Section 280 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (for short, 'Act') till the attainment of the age of sixty years so as to push the position … all these petitions.6. Shri Maheshwari submitted that judgment rendered in LPA No. 129/85 on 28-4-1986 by the Division Bench of this Court, taking the view

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary to Central Governmen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 3, 4, 13, 77, 78 and 50B; Requisition and Acquisition of Lands Act; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act - Sections 19 and 19(5); Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Tenancy Act - Sections 50B; Land Acquisition Act; Registration Act - Sections 54; Transfer of Property Act; Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317F; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 16 and 31; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD532; 2002(5)ALT370

G.L.R. entries may have to be appreciated in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. The Cantonments Act, 1924 applied only to British India.Hyderabad was a princely State and the provisions of the Cantonments Act do not … parties. The Tahsildar validated the said alienation and sale certificates dated 18-4-1972 were issued to the purchasers under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The remaining land was partitioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2004

Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-13-2004

Subject : Labour and IndustrialInsurance

Acts : Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 75 and 75(2B); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR315]; (2005)ILLJ842Raj; RLW2004(4)Raj2579; 2004(4)WLC165

the petitioner in any manner. St Mary's School's case throws light in connection with the provisions of Containments Act, 1924, which contained the like provisions as as before the Supreme Court in Shyam Kishore's case (supra). Section 87 … The authority relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner in St. Mary's School and Ors. v. Cantonment Board, Meerut and Ors. (10), in our opinion, does not assist or furthers the cause of the petitioner … cropped up was about like provision in the Customs Act, 1962. Section 129E of the Customs Act provided a conditional right of appeal in respect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 1983

i.C. Chakravarty Vs. Khasi Hills District Council

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-14-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Autonomous District (Administration of Justice) Rules, 1953 - Rule 1

him for that purpose. III. The Local Government shall be at liberty to establish civil and military sanitoria, cantonments and posts in any part of the country under your control, and to occupy the lands necessary for … 51, 58, 59 (b), 59 (g), 65, 78, 129, 217 and 218 of the said Act shall … Draft Constitution, the debates in the Constituent Assembly as well as certain notification by which the Bengal Municipal Act as well as the Assam Municipal Act were extended to the area in question. 5. In the Draft … Council, to the villages of Mawkhar, Laban etc., vide A. R. Municipal 1924-25. The Government divided the Municipality into 10 wards which included Mawkhar. proper … shall not be interfered with.........' On 15-11-1910 a notification was issued under Section 8 of the Bengal Municipal Act. 1884 extending the Act to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1995

Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S. A. Vs. M/V Sky Reefer

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-19-1995

Subject : MRTP

provisions to that effect in their domestic versions of the Hague Rules, see, e. g., Sea-Carriage of Goods Act 1924, § 9(2) (Australia); Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, No. 1 of 1986, § 3 (South Africa). In … of Appeals without exception have invalidated foreign forum selection clauses under § 3(8). See Union Ins. Soc. of Canton, Ltd. v. S. S. Elikon, 642 F.2d 721 , 723-725 (CA4 1981); Conklin & Garrett, Ltd v. MN … "aris[e] from ... failure in the duties or obligations provided in this section," § 3(8) is concerned with the liability imposed elsewhere in § 3, … request, it certified for interlocutory appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1292(b) its ruling to compel arbitration, stating that the controlling question of law

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial