Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 103 · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 31 2011

Airports Authority of India Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2011

Subject : Municipalities

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 68(1), 103, 69, 71, 64(a)(b), 84; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 126; Constitution of India - Article 226

February 2003 raised by the DCB calling upon AAI to pay Rs. 20,12,06,539/- as house tax under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (CA, 1924) for the period 1st April 1998 to 31st May 2002. 2. On 26th May 2003, this … buildings as provided by AAI by its letter dated 6th June 1983 in response to the notice under Section 103 of the CA, 1924 and the valuation as on 1st April 1982 i.e. Rs. 4,61,95,650/-. Since the actual

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2006

Jagat Pal Cheema Vs. Cantonment Board and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Feb-15-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 13(5), 14(1), 37, 39, 40, 43, 51, 51(1) and 52; ;Cantonment (Amendment) Act, 1942 - Section 52(1); ;Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir - Section 103; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ631

dated 06-08-01 to the Cantonment Board, Jammu, while exercising the powers vested under Section 52 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (hereinafter called the Act) in respect of a decision taken by the Board by their Cantonment Board Resolution … of dismissal.3. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of the State of Jammu & Kashmir for quashing Order No. 6/33/B/Appeal/Cantt./JPS/DE/NC dated 22nd November, … aforesaid order passed by this Court, the matter was placed before the Cantonment Board and the Cantonment Board in its meeting held on 18-05-2001, afforded

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1951

Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-1951

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ236

the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment. The petitioner was convicted as stated above.4. Section 103 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, runs as follows:The Executive Officer may, by written notice, call upon any inhabitant of the Cantonment to furnish

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 02 1957

Pirthi Raj Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-02-1957

Subject : Other TaxesCriminal

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 103(1) and 103(2)

Reported in : AIR1958P& H396; 1958CriLJ1343

filed by Prithi Raj who has been convicted by a Magistrate at Jullundur under Section 103(2) of the. Cantonments Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 75/- or in default two months' simple imprisonment, his appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2003

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence and anr. Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Rules, 1925; Land Revenue Act; Land Regulations; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Practice of Civil Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : AIR2003AP329; 2003(4)ALD302

Register held that there is no statutory base for the General Statutory Register since the whole of the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Rules framed in 1925 are not applicable to the Secunderabad Cantonment and they were applicable only … that the suit schedule land forms part of GLR Sy.No. 586 is on the defendants. Added to this, Section 103 of the Evidence Act provides that the burden of proof as to any particular fact lies on that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1953

Cantonment Board, Poona Vs. Western India theatres Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-10-1953

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 245 and 265; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 60, 60(1), 73 and 103; Government of India Act, 1861 - Sections 42; Validity of Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901 - Sections 59(1) and 60(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1935 - Sections 14; Finance (New Duties) Act, 1916; Punjab Urban Immoveable Property Tax Act, 1940; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923

Reported in : AIR1954Bom261; (1954)56BOMLR45; ILR1954Bom647

1947. It purported to levy this tax under the power conferred upon it by Sectoin 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. That section runs as follows:'The Board may, with the previous sanction of the Local Government impose, in any … to the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, we find that power was conferred upon the Provincial Government under Section 103 to require the Municipality to impose a fresh tax or to enhance a tax which had already been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1979

Phiroze Temulji Anklesaria Vs. H.C. Vashistha and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-1979

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 31, 31(1), 31(2), 32, 226, 282 and 299; Government Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35, 61, 65, 91, 101, 102, 103, 104 and 114; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92; Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Reported in : AIR1980Bom9

the facts. The property involved is a piece of land situated at 17. Right Flank Lines in Poona Cantonment and measuring 0.85 acres equivalent to 4100 sq. metres. On the said land is also situated a bungalow. … 1827. Since there is no grant which gives power to the Government to resume the land, the Government's action in issuing the impugned notice is illegal being without any authority of law. The petitioner mentions that by … a public trust could be removed by following the procedure mentioned in Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Supreme Court noticed the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary to Central Governmen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 3, 4, 13, 77, 78 and 50B; Requisition and Acquisition of Lands Act; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act - Sections 19 and 19(5); Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Tenancy Act - Sections 50B; Land Acquisition Act; Registration Act - Sections 54; Transfer of Property Act; Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317F; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 16 and 31; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD532; 2002(5)ALT370

G.L.R. entries may have to be appreciated in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. The Cantonments Act, 1924 applied only to British India.Hyderabad was a princely State and the provisions of the Cantonments Act do not … parties. The Tahsildar validated the said alienation and sale certificates dated 18-4-1972 were issued to the purchasers under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The remaining land was partitioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1971

S.M. Murad Ali Qureshi Vs. Cantonment Board, Varanasi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-05-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 187

Reported in : AIR1971All411

of the overheadpassage.The petitioner was required by that notice which purported to be under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 to demolish the unauthorised constructions within 35 days of the receipt of the notice failing which action under … the Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, that the construction proposed by him had been sanctioned on payment of Rs. 103.75, In due course the payment was made and the construction was completed. It was later discovered by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2007

Jindal Strips Limited and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-14-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Reported in : (2008)12VST149(P& H)

1973 (Haryana Act 24 of 1973), or a Town Board or a Cantonment Board established under the Cantonment Act, 1924 (Central Act 2 of 1924), or a Zila Parishad established under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Haryana … from challenge.65. In State of Bihar v. Bihar Chamber of Commerce [1996] 103 STC 1, the Supreme Court examined the challenge to the constitutional validity … mean the areas within the limits of a (i) Municipal Corporation, (ii) Municipality, (iii) Notified area committee, (iv) Cantonment board, (v) Town board, (vi) Mines board, (vii) Municipal board, (viii) Gram panchayat and (ix) any other local … supply and sanitation were meant to facilitate freeflow of trade and since Section 22 of the Act provided for distribution of tax collected among local

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial