Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 101 · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 2003

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence and anr. Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Rules, 1925; Land Revenue Act; Land Regulations; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Practice of Civil Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : AIR2003AP329; 2003(4)ALD302

Register held that there is no statutory base for the General Statutory Register since the whole of the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Rules framed in 1925 are not applicable to the Secunderabad Cantonment and they were applicable only … the learned Trial Judge while deciding issue Nos. 1 to 3. Sections 101 - 104 of the Indian Evidence Act deal with the burden of … which are dealt with seriatum.9. The first contention raised by the learned Standing Counsel is that notice under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure Code (for short 'the Code') was not issued by the plaintiffs and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1979

Phiroze Temulji Anklesaria Vs. H.C. Vashistha and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-1979

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 31, 31(1), 31(2), 32, 226, 282 and 299; Government Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35, 61, 65, 91, 101, 102, 103, 104 and 114; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92; Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Reported in : AIR1980Bom9

the facts. The property involved is a piece of land situated at 17. Right Flank Lines in Poona Cantonment and measuring 0.85 acres equivalent to 4100 sq. metres. On the said land is also situated a bungalow. … 1827. Since there is no grant which gives power to the Government to resume the land, the Government's action in issuing the impugned notice is illegal being without any authority of law. The petitioner mentions that by … a public trust could be removed by following the procedure mentioned in Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Supreme Court noticed the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary to Central Governmen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 3, 4, 13, 77, 78 and 50B; Requisition and Acquisition of Lands Act; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act - Sections 19 and 19(5); Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Tenancy Act - Sections 50B; Land Acquisition Act; Registration Act - Sections 54; Transfer of Property Act; Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317F; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 16 and 31; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD532; 2002(5)ALT370

G.L.R. entries may have to be appreciated in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. The Cantonments Act, 1924 applied only to British India.Hyderabad was a princely State and the provisions of the Cantonments Act do not … parties. The Tahsildar validated the said alienation and sale certificates dated 18-4-1972 were issued to the purchasers under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The remaining land was partitioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 31 2007

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2007

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined under Section 3 of new Act as a place or places along with boundaries in … effect that the definitions are to be read in the context of the statute. He referred to para 101 of the judgment in Indian Handicrafts Emporium and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. : AIR2003SC3240 to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2014

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, (2 of 1924), means that State Government.” 47. A bare perusal thereof would indicate that it is providing … SC 794. 3. Her Highness Maharani Shantidevi P. Gaikwad v/s Savjibhai Haribhai Patel, reported in (2001) 5 SCC 101. 4. Commissioner of Income Tax v/s M/s Shah Sadiq and Sons, reported in (1987) 3 SCC 516. 5.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1992

Gangaram Vs. the Municipal Counsel, Nagar Palika, Neemuch and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1992

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 164(1); Madhya Bharat Municipalities Act, 1954 - Sections 94

Reported in : AIR1992MP303; 1993(0)MPLJ550

1966 SC 108 : (1966 Cri LJ 93) held in the context of Section 259(1) of the Cantonment Act, 1924, as amended by Act No. 2 of 1954 that action for recovery could be taken under S, 259 … April 1939 and expiring 31st March, 1949. The lease, Ex.P/46, shows that at that time Neemueh was a Cantonment and the lease was executed by the Resident for Central India on behalf of the Secretary for India … Orissa High Court in Surajbali Ram v. Dhani Bau, AIR 1979 Orissa 101.16. It therefore follows that a tenant having been inducted into possession by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 1975

State of U.P. Vs. Smt. Ram Sri and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-1975

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 117(1), 117(2) and 117(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 26, Rule 10(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 35; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 47, 112 and 149; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1976All121

Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959, the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916, the United Provinces Town Areas Act. 1914, or the Cantonments Act, 1924, as the case may be had vested in the State under this Act shall vest in the Gaon … 2 C. P. C., counsel for the plaintiffs stated that plots Nos. 101, 103, 199/1, 200, 204 and 205 were Banjar and Usar plots plots … Bazar over those plots. After the Zamindari was abolished, the State of U. P. issued a notification under Section 117 of the Act, As a result of this notification, the aforesaid Banjar, Usar, Rasta and Abadi plots,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2005

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-22-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)102ITD1(Mum.)

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924); Section 10(20A) omitted by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1-4-2003.Prior to its omission, clause (20A), … Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of A.P. Stale Road Transport Corporation v. ITO [1963] 47 ITR 101, wherein Their Lordships observed that if the area of operation is whole of the State, then such bodies

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2004

The State of Bihar Vs. Suraj Nath Teli and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-18-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquistion Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 18

Reported in : 2004(3)BLJR1669

Pochra were declared to be Cantonment for the purpose of Cantonment's Act, 1924.14. Exhibit-1 was sale deed dated 19.3.1982, whereby 2 decimals land of Ramgarh … 64, 66, 70, 71, 72, 78, 79, 83, 88, 90, 98, 100, 101, 103, 104, 109, 132, 135, 140, 143, 156, 161, 163 and 164 … villages Bujrug Jamira and Pochra, within Ramgarh Police Station of Hazaribagh District were acquired for expansion of Ramgarh Cantonment. The aforesaid two villages were within the Ramgarh Cantonment Board area,3. Notification under Section 4 of the Land … aforesaid two villages were within the Ramgarh Cantonment Board area,3. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act') was published in Hazaribagh District Gazette on 16.12.1983. Declaration

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1996

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. State of Punjab, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 54, 133, 142, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 ot 255, 256 to 263, 285, 289(1), 357, 367 and 372; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 61; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 - Sections 60, 62 and 119; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 5, 6, 94, 99, 100, 104, 154, 155(1) and 311(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Government of India Act, 1919; Government of Part C States Act, 1951 - Sections 21, 22 and 38(22); Reorganisation Act, 1956; Union Territory by the Punjab (Reorganisation) Act, 1966; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970; North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Ac

Reported in : AIR1997SC2847; JT1997(1)SC40; 1996(9)SCALE613; (1997)7SCC339; [1996]Supp10SCR472

on Property, such as, in the case of Entry 3, List I which deals with Cantonments and the Cantonments Act, 1924 which allows Parliament to levy taxes for Contonments. Mr. Sen then contended that such a power would be … the 1st day of October, 1912. Schedule-A to the Act defined the 'territory' covered by the new Province. Sections 2 and 3 of the 1912 Act provided inter alia that the creation of the new Province of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial