Advanced Search Results

Smt. Husenbi SadroddIn Shaiakh Vs. Cantonment Board, by Its Executive ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 179(2) and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2003Kant281; ILR2003KAR1935; 2003(4)KarLJ241

defendant - Board restraining the Board from acting upon the notice issued by it under Section 256 of Cantonments Act, 1924 ('the Act' for short) on the ground that the Board was not entitled to initiate action under Section … Srinivasa Reddy, J. 1. In this appeal under Section 100 C.P.C. the appellant-plaintiff calls in question the judgment and decree of the 1st Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at

The Western India theatres Ltd. Vs. the Cantonment Board, Poona, Canto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1913; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 73, 75 and 76; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1935 - Sections 14; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 276(2)

Reported in : AIR1959SC582; [1959]Supp(2)SCR63

issued by the respondent whereby, in exercise of the powers conferred on it by s. 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (II of 1924), the respondent proposed to make, with the previous sanction of the Central Government, certain amendments … all times material to this appeal the respondent was governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Act II of 1924). Section 60 of that Act runs as follows :- '60(1) The Board may, with the previous sanction of the … Rs. 10-0-0 | show2. Circus Rs. 2-0-0 per show3. Horse Races Rs. 100-0-0 per day of racemeetings.4. Amusement park Rs. 20-0-0 per day. provided as

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service TaxConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(16), 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73 and 83; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 9C, 9D and 11B; Income Tax Act, 1961; Medicinal Act, 1955; Kerala Abkari Act; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Uttar Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1995; Andhra Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987; West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994; Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245, 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 265, 268A, 269, 276, 276(1), 276(2), 276(3) and 366(29A)

Reported in : AIR2007SC2990; (2008)5CompLJ488(SC); (2007)211CTR(SC)449; 2007(120)ECC451; 2007LC451(SC); [2007]293ITR406(SC); JT2007(10)SC305; (2007)6MLJ1062(SC); 2007(10)SCALE178; 2007(7)SCC527

cinematograph films. A notice was issued to the appellant by the Cantonment Board under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 imposing tax on entertainments. The said levy was challenged on the ground that under Section 100 of the

Ramgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(30), 3(30A), 82, 137, 138, 150, 326 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223

or authority to levy tax on entry of mechanically propelled vehicles, the Cantonment Board cannot exercise those powers. CANTONMENTS ACT, 1924. Section 60 & Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act (7 of 1922), Sections 82 & 137: [Ashok Bhan &Dalveer Bhandari,

Anand Prakash Agrawal Son of Shri Dhan Prakash Agrawal Vs. Cantonment ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 19 and 20; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 274; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2854

the restraint order against him, he continued to make constructions. Notice was issued under Section 185 of Cantonment Act 1924 to the opposite parties as well as to the subsequent purchasers of the land in question (which was … with others filed Suit No. 581 of 1994 for permanent injunction against the Executive Officer and President of Cantonment Board, Meerut Cantt (applicants in contempt application pending before the Hon'ble Single Judge) in the court of Civil … application was filed as per the provision of Order 23 Rule 1 C.P.C. The suit itself was withdrawn on 30.11.2000 and, therefore, the appeal and

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

outside the notified area and to establish that such area was declared under Section 43A of the Cantonment Act, 1924. In the circumstances, I do not find that it is a case where this court in exercise of … substantial question on this point but for unknown reasons did not consider it proper to decide the same. Section 100 CPC :47. Section 100 CPC provides for a second appeal only on the substantial question of law. Generally, … to be ignored altogether and making reference to the record of the Cantonment Board. In case, the Union of India did not produce the revenue

Chief Executive Officer Vs. Surendra Kumar Vakil and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 4 to 8; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 184 and 280; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 274; British statutes(Application to India) Repeal Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1999SC2294; JT1999(2)SC315; 1999(2)SCALE208; (1999)3SCC555; [1999]2SCR118; (1999)2UPLBEC1360

bungalows in the cantonments all over India came in the hands of civilians.11. Under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, power was given to the Governor General in Council to make rules for the purpose of carrying out … general land register, land in the cantonment is divided into class A land, class B land and class C land. Rules 7 and 8 deal with these different categories of land.12. Under the Cantonment Land Administration Rules,

Cantonment Board, Delhi Vs. Mangey Ram

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 181

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi77; 1986(11)DRJ97

the Cantonment Board to issue orders of sanction of building plans by virtue of the provisions of Cantonment Act, 1924 include within its ambit power exercisable in a like manner to add to, amend, vary or rescind an … S.S. Chadha, J.(1) The question of law raised in this second appeal is whether the Cantonment Board, Delhi Cantt. Delhi has power or jurisdiction to revise or reopen the plans already sanclioned.(2) Shri Mangey … so issued. Reliance is placed in that regard on the provisions of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. Reference is also made to … inter alia, on the grounds that there is no jurisdiction in the C(3) The main submission of the counsel for the appellant is that the

Mrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1810

Defence grounds in question has been given to the respondent company as per the provisions contained in the Cantonment Act, 1924 read, with Rules framed under Section 280 thereof, namely, Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937.16. Mr. Jayaram, … grounds in question has been given to the respondent company as per the provisions contained in the Cantonment Act, 1924 read, with Rules framed under Section 280 thereof, namely, Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937.16. Mr. Jayaram, learned Senior … that the 3rd Respondent had approached Brig. I.J. Singh, Commander K.K. & C. Area to present the Armed Force Show. Further, in that letter is

Smt. Haannurammabai Kalal (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 185, 185(1), 256, 268, 273, 273(1) and 273(4); Limitation Act; Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 64C; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ528; 2008(1)AIRKarR178; 2008AIHC1220(Kar); 2008AIHC1220(Kar)

was projected, non-issuance of notice by appellant as required under Section 273(1) is not a serious infirmity. -- CANTONMENTS ACT, 1924. Section 254: Demolition of any erection Held, Notice prior to the action is mandatory, if not the action is