Advanced Search Results

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s) … Act. (vi) such other functions of like nature as may be entrusted to the Board by the Government. CHAPTER V MARKET OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE 26. Establishment of market of national importance and Marketing Committee thereof -(1) Notwithstanding

Vikas Singh Vs. Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Delhi Fire Service Act defines ‘building bye-laws’ to mean “the bye-laws made under Section 186 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924) or the bye-laws made under Section 349-A of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (66 … the Director of the Delhi Fire Service in terms of Section 2(s) of the Delhi Fire Service Act.34. Chapter VI of the Delhi Fire Services Act makes special provisions for Fire Protection and Fire Safety Measures in certain

Ramgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(30), 3(30A), 82, 137, 138, 150, 326 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223

on vehicles entering into the cantonment area.3. Appellant No. 1, Ramgarh Cantonment Board, a board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in exercise of the power vested in it under Section 60 of … levy entry tax, it is necessary to find whether the municipality has similar power to levy entry tax.9. Chapter IV of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 (for short 1922 Act) deals with the subject of … the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, Bihar. 4. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Ranchi vide letter dated 30.5.2001 informed that prior permission of the Ministry of Road

Jagat Pal Cheema Vs. Cantonment Board and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 13(5), 14(1), 37, 39, 40, 43, 51, 51(1) and 52; ;Cantonment (Amendment) Act, 1942 - Section 52(1); ;Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir - Section 103; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ631

dated 06-08-01 to the Cantonment Board, Jammu, while exercising the powers vested under Section 52 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (hereinafter called the Act) in respect of a decision taken by the Board by their Cantonment Board Resolution … May, 2001.2. In pursuance of the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the matter was placed before the Cantonment Board and the Cantonment Board in its meeting held on 18-05-2001, afforded an opportunity of hearing to the … as may be provided, by regulations made by the Board under this chapter.2/The President may, whenever he thinks fit, and shall, upon a requisition in … the Appellate authority. The Appellate authority dismissed the appeal of the petitioner, vide its order dated 22.11.1998. Petitioner challenged the dismissal order dated 22.11.1998, by

indore Nagar Nigam Karmachari Congress and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 58(5) and 58(6); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1988; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1998(1)MPLJ449

Commanding-in-Chief to transfer the employee from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board. But section 280 of the Cantonments Act which confers the power on the Central Government to make rules, did not provide any power to frame … Rule 5-C of the Cantonment Boards servants Rules, 1937 as ultra vires of the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. Rule 5-C gave a power to Commanding-in-Chief to transfer the employee from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment … transfer is of discriminative nature and hits the fundamental rights guaranteed under Chapter III of the Constitution to the citizens of India.'In this connection, the … (Amendment) Act, 1988 (Act No. 7 of 1988) may be declared ultra vires of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India.3. The petitioner-Indore

Gaya Prasad Vs. Surendra Bahadur Singh (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 23; Uttar Pradesh Encumbered Estates Act, 1934 - Sections 4, 6, 7, 7(4), 14(7), 18, 24, 43 and 44

Reported in : AIR1987SC925; JT1987(1)SC652; 1987(1)SCALE514; (1987)2SCC383; [1987]2SCR542; 1987(2)LC89(SC)

has been provided in Section 18. Section 18 reads:Subject to the right of appeal or revision conferred in Chapter VI, the effect of a decree of the Special Judge under Sub-section (7) of Section 14 shall be to … Area under the provisions of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, or a cantonment under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924, or a Town Area … under the provisions of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, or a cantonment under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924, or a Town Area under the provisions of the U.P. Town Area Act, 1914, as shall have been

Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1880 - Sections 21, 22; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 45(1), 60 to 63 and 81(2) and 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 265; Bombay Municipal Act, 1872; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1873; Cantonments Act, 1910; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 32(4); Limitation Act, 1623; Sex Disqualification Act, 1919; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2); Cantonment (Extention of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740; (1995) 3 SCC 434

Notification relating to assessment, collection and recovery of octroi duties.8. After the aforesaid Notifications had been issued, the Cantonments Act, 1924 was enacted. Chapter V of this Act is on the subject of 'Taxation'; and Sections 60 to 63 … the rates (so also the articles) need not be those which prevailed when the Notification was issued.19. In view of all the above, we hold that the 1881 Notification was meant to impose octroi duties, not only

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Mukesh Prasad and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 60(1), 61 and 62; Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 82, 137, 138 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 6

Reported in : II(2002)ACC184; 2002(50)BLJR169

facts leading to the filing of this appeal are that Ramgarh Cantonment Board, a Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924, in purported exercise of the power allegedly vested in it under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, … we have to advert to Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act, 1922. Section 82 of 1922 Act falls in Chapter IV which deals with the subject of 'Municipal Taxation'. Part I of Chapter IV relates to the subject … area has the power to levy tax under a relevant enactment by virtue of the power created under Sub-section (1) of Section 60, the same

Durga Dass Sud and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 13(3), 31(1), 226, 366(10) and 372; ;Cantonments (House Accomodation) Act, 1902; ;Cantonment Act, 1924; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11

Reported in : AIR1972HP26

dead-letter having no statutory force at any time. The land and the property of the Cantonment after the Cantonments Act 1924, could only be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the said Act. It had further been … The bill was introduced in the Council of the Governor-General of India on 12th October 1888 and its Chapter V was headed 'Immoveable Property in Cantonments'. But subsequently due to some opposition this Chapter was omitted and … the petitioners on 18th July, 1919 for a sum of Rs. 14,000/- vide a sale deed (Annexure A). The present value of the house is

Purshottam Das Tandon Vs. Military Estate Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 1(2) and 7; Constitution of India - Article 226; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 2, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR2000All127; (2000)1UPLBEC738

casts a duty on the Military Estate Officer to maintain General Land Register of all lands in the Cantonments; Sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 states that no addition or alteration shall be made in General Land Register … and the Cantonment Act, 1910; with effect from 1924, the entire Cantonment matters are governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Government of India has framed a number of Rules in order to manage the properties of the … been refused by this Court. This fact has been deliberately suppressed. Under Chapter XXII, Rules 1(2) and 7 of the Rules of Court it was … mentioned.This writ petition was finally dismissed with certain liberties to both parties vide Order dated 6th July, 1970, the relevant portion of which reads thus