Advanced Search Results

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s) … Act. (vi) such other functions of like nature as may be entrusted to the Board by the Government. CHAPTER V MARKET OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE 26. Establishment of market of national importance and Marketing Committee thereof -(1) Notwithstanding anything

Jammu Cantonment Residents Assoc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 61 and 62; ;Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR1990J& K56

with:'SRO 61, dated : 17th Feb. 1959:-- In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924) The Cantonment Board, Jammu after having complied with the provisions of Sections 61 and 62 … Cantonment to impose taxes strictly according to the procedure established under and for the purposes of the Act.5. Chapter V of the Act relates to taxation and Section 60 of the Act authorises the Board to impose a

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 and 72; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 78, 82(3), 83(3) and 123(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

and taxed on their annual value in accordance with the provisions contained in Chapter V of the Cantonment Act, 1924 ('Act' for short). It appears that after 1st April, 1980 the respondents constructed certain additional buildings. By their … ORDERA.P. Shah, J.1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the Pune Cantonment Board and its Executive Officer is directed against the judgment and order dated 21st October 1986 passed by

Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1880 - Sections 21, 22; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 45(1), 60 to 63 and 81(2) and 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 265; Bombay Municipal Act, 1872; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1873; Cantonments Act, 1910; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 32(4); Limitation Act, 1623; Sex Disqualification Act, 1919; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2); Cantonment (Extention of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740; (1995) 3 SCC 434

Notification relating to assessment, collection and recovery of octroi duties.8. After the aforesaid Notifications had been issued, the Cantonments Act, 1924 was enacted. Chapter V of this Act is on the subject of 'Taxation'; and Sections 60 to 63

Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ236

entering a town or district as distinguished from custom duties which are those levied at the front. In Chapter V of the Cantonments Act 'Octroi' has been included in the general subject 'Taxation' and it can be taken … the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment. The petitioner was convicted as stated above.4. Section 103 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, runs as follows:The Executive Officer may, by written notice, call upon any inhabitant of the Cantonment to furnish

M. Gopal Pondither Vs. the District Magistrate-cum-collector of Chingl ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 84 and 87

Reported in : AIR1978Mad413

provisions. Section 87 of the Cantonments Act 1924 says that no appeal shall be heard or determined under Chapter V of the Cantonments Act unless the appeal is brought within thirty days next after the date of the … had already submitted his objections.3. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal on 19-8-1968 under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act 1924 to the first respondent who is the prescribed appellate authority under the Act. By a communication dated 3-2-1970,

P.S. Gill and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Indian Works of defense Act, 1903; Cantonment Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 16(1979)DLT266; ILR1979Delhi601; 1979RLR497

been included within the limits of the Cantt. by a notification dated 2-5-1942 under Section 4(3) of the Cantonments Act. 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1924 Act'). On 4th December. 1962, notifications were issued by the Government of … in a cantonment as a municipality has in the State wherein the Cantonment is situated. (Section 60 and Chapter V). The Board is in charge of a Cantonment Fund to which are credited all sums received by or

Avinash S/O Pandurang Tarawade and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 127; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

Reported in : 2004(5)BomCR913; 2004(2)MhLj511

of publication of the notification. The Board thereafter, in exercise of the powers conferred on it under the Cantonments Act, 1924, was pleased to impose tax, to be known as Vehicle Entry Tax on commercially loaded vehicles entering and … of a Highway which do not already vest in the State Government shall, for the purpose of this Chapter, be deemed to be the property of the State Government. It is pointed out that the roads either … Respondent No. 3 is the Contractor, to whom the contract to collect vehicle Entry Tax has been allotted. Respondent No. 4 is Union of India

Cantonment Board Vs. St. John's School and Anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 87 and 99(2)

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2795; (2002)2UPLBEC1892

passed by Additional District Judge, Meerut by which he has allowed an appeal under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (in short 'the Act') setting aside notice dated 24.3.1988 levying property tax on Bungalow No. 117 Bank Street, … interpretation of Section 99 of the Act providing for exemption of payment of tax on buildings falling under Chapter of special provisions relating to taxation. He submits that Clause (b) of Section 99(2) of the Act, exempts … School').2. I have heard Sri Samir Sharma appearing for petitioner and Sri Vivek Chaudhary for respondent.3. The Executive Officer, Cantonment Board issued notice dated 27.6.1987

Jagat Pal Cheema Vs. Cantonment Board and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 13(5), 14(1), 37, 39, 40, 43, 51, 51(1) and 52; ;Cantonment (Amendment) Act, 1942 - Section 52(1); ;Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir - Section 103; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ631

dated 06-08-01 to the Cantonment Board, Jammu, while exercising the powers vested under Section 52 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (hereinafter called the Act) in respect of a decision taken by the Board by their Cantonment Board Resolution … May, 2001.2. In pursuance of the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the matter was placed before the Cantonment Board and the Cantonment Board in its meeting held on 18-05-2001, afforded an opportunity of hearing to the … as may be provided, by regulations made by the Board under this chapter.2/The President may, whenever he thinks fit, and shall, upon a requisition in … the Appellate authority. The Appellate authority dismissed the appeal of the petitioner, vide its order dated 22.11.1998. Petitioner challenged the dismissal order dated 22.11.1998, by