Advanced Search Results

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s) … Act. (vi) such other functions of like nature as may be entrusted to the Board by the Government. CHAPTER V MARKET OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE 26. Establishment of market of national importance and Marketing Committee thereof -(1) Notwithstanding

Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1880 - Sections 21, 22; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 45(1), 60 to 63 and 81(2) and 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 265; Bombay Municipal Act, 1872; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1873; Cantonments Act, 1910; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 32(4); Limitation Act, 1623; Sex Disqualification Act, 1919; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2); Cantonment (Extention of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740; (1995) 3 SCC 434

Notification relating to assessment, collection and recovery of octroi duties.8. After the aforesaid Notifications had been issued, the Cantonments Act, 1924 was enacted. Chapter V of this Act is on the subject of 'Taxation'; and Sections 60 to 63 … and recovery of any tax in Municipality.5. The Government of Bombay by its Resolution No. 234 adopted on 26.1.1881 approved the levy of octroi in the Cantonment on the same articles and at the same rate as

Ramgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(30), 3(30A), 82, 137, 138, 150, 326 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223

on vehicles entering into the cantonment area.3. Appellant No. 1, Ramgarh Cantonment Board, a board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in exercise of the power vested in it under Section 60 of … levy entry tax, it is necessary to find whether the municipality has similar power to levy entry tax.9. Chapter IV of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 (for short 1922 Act) deals with the subject of … cannot levy the tax which cannot be levied by the Municipality.5. On 26.7.2001, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

respectively.4. The complaints were filed by the Cantonment Board through its Estate Officer under Section 184 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alleging illegal constructions on the land belonging to the Cantonment Board without due permission. Since the Offences were … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the

State of Kerala, Represented By the Principal Secretary to Government ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Board of Secunderabad to levy and collect octroi on certain items, while interpreting Section 60 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, held that the word 'Municipality' has a very vide connotation and after referring to Art.243Q, it is held … was considering conversion of a ward in a Municipal area coming under Chapter IXA to a Panchayat coming under Part IX of the Constitution. (iii) … to the Constitution by incorporating Part IX-B, held at para 25 and 26 as under: 25. Silence in the Constitution and abeyance as well has … not either as Municipal council or Municipal Corporation. The learned Government Pleader placed reliance on the judgment in Cantonment Board, Secunderabad v. G.Venketram Reddy (1995) 4 SCC 561] wherein the Supreme Court while considering the right of

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part of … Cantonment areas are under the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and Others Vs. M/S.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part of … Cantonment areas are under the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of

Sant Ram Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 - Rule 26; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 12

Reported in : AIR1976Delhi90

in the Cantonment Board v. Dipak Parkash, : [1963]1SCR196 where the expression 'occupation' in Section 99(2)(c) of the Cantonments Act. 1924 was construed in the context of liability for tax. There was a lease taken by the Central Government … an appropriate valuation. 8. It is necessary, in the first place, to read Rule 26. which occurs in Chapter V of the Rules: 'Transfer of acquired evacuee Property which is an allottable property is in sole occupation

Gaya Prasad Vs. Surendra Bahadur Singh (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 23; Uttar Pradesh Encumbered Estates Act, 1934 - Sections 4, 6, 7, 7(4), 14(7), 18, 24, 43 and 44

Reported in : AIR1987SC925; JT1987(1)SC652; 1987(1)SCALE514; (1987)2SCC383; [1987]2SCR542; 1987(2)LC89(SC)

in a Municipality or a Notified Area under the provisions of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, or a cantonment under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924, or a Town Area under the provisions of the U.P. … under the provisions of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, or a cantonment under the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924, or a Town Area under the provisions of the U.P. Town Area Act, 1914, as shall have been … under Section 20 or until the Collector has liquidated the debt under Chapter V, no decree obtained on the basis of any private debt incurred … subject matter of this appeal. This application was allowed as early as 26.3.43. It was long thereafter, on 4.5.58, that he entered into an agreement

Power Machines India Limited Vs. State of Mahdya Pradesh and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

held that service was not transferable as such Rule 5 was ultra vires of section 280(2)(c) of the Cantonments Act, 1924. On facts the case has no application.25. Reliance has also been placed on International Airports Authority of India … different means of carrying them out or to depart from or vary its ends. (See Section 59 in chapter “Delegated Legislation” in Francis Bennion’s Statutory Interpretation, 3rd Edn.) The aforesaid principle will apply with greater rigour where … is power with the court to stay execution under Order 21 Rule 26 of the CPC. Order 21 Rule 58 of the CPC provides for