Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 chapter 20 · Page 1 of about 69 results (0.016 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 21 2008

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s) … Act. (vi) such other functions of like nature as may be entrusted to the Board by the Government. CHAPTER V MARKET OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE 26. Establishment of market of national importance and Marketing Committee thereof -(1) Notwithstanding … we refer to the facts mentioned in Civil Appeal No. 8180 of 2008 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 6757 of 2007) filed by AMC,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2008

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-23-2008

Subject : Criminal

respectively.4. The complaints were filed by the Cantonment Board through its Estate Officer under Section 184 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alleging illegal constructions on the land belonging to the Cantonment Board without due permission. Since the Offences were … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the … by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Shillong in Complaint Case No. 644/645/649(S) of 2008, dismissing the complaints and acquitting the accused persons for non-production of witnesses.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2008

Ramgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-2008

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(30), 3(30A), 82, 137, 138, 150, 326 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223

on vehicles entering into the cantonment area.3. Appellant No. 1, Ramgarh Cantonment Board, a board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in exercise of the power vested in it under Section 60 of … levy entry tax, it is necessary to find whether the municipality has similar power to levy entry tax.9. Chapter IV of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 (for short 1922 Act) deals with the subject of … directed against the judgment passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 556 of 2001 dated 4th October, 2001 delivered by the High Court of Jharkhand at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2000

Purshottam Das Tandon Vs. Military Estate Officer

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-07-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 1(2) and 7; Constitution of India - Article 226; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 2, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR2000All127; (2000)1UPLBEC738

casts a duty on the Military Estate Officer to maintain General Land Register of all lands in the Cantonments; Sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 states that no addition or alteration shall be made in General Land Register … and the Cantonment Act, 1910; with effect from 1924, the entire Cantonment matters are governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Government of India has framed a number of Rules in order to manage the properties of the … been refused by this Court. This fact has been deliberately suppressed. Under Chapter XXII, Rules 1(2) and 7 of the Rules of Court it was … preliminary issue by the Additional Civil Judge, Allahabad vide his Order dated 20-10-1976 (which has been brought on the record through an affidavit dated 17-12--1999)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2003

Avinash S/O Pandurang Tarawade and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 127; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

Reported in : 2004(5)BomCR913; 2004(2)MhLj511

of publication of the notification. The Board thereafter, in exercise of the powers conferred on it under the Cantonments Act, 1924, was pleased to impose tax, to be known as Vehicle Entry Tax on commercially loaded vehicles entering and … of a Highway which do not already vest in the State Government shall, for the purpose of this Chapter, be deemed to be the property of the State Government. It is pointed out that the roads either … commenced from 11-10-2003. The contention of the petitioners is that, considering, Section 20 of the Bombay Motor Vehicles Act, 1958, the Cantonment Board has no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1995

Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-10-1995

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1880 - Sections 21, 22; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 45(1), 60 to 63 and 81(2) and 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 265; Bombay Municipal Act, 1872; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1873; Cantonments Act, 1910; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 32(4); Limitation Act, 1623; Sex Disqualification Act, 1919; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2); Cantonment (Extention of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740; (1995) 3 SCC 434

Notification relating to assessment, collection and recovery of octroi duties.8. After the aforesaid Notifications had been issued, the Cantonments Act, 1924 was enacted. Chapter V of this Act is on the subject of 'Taxation'; and Sections 60 to 63 … had issued four Notifications bearing Nos. 4160 to 4163 dated 17th June, 1918 which were gazetted on June 20, 1918. Notification No. 4160 had been issued in exercise of powers conferred by Section 15(1) of the Cantonments

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 1971

Durga Dass Sud and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-28-1971

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 13(3), 31(1), 226, 366(10) and 372; ;Cantonments (House Accomodation) Act, 1902; ;Cantonment Act, 1924; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11

Reported in : AIR1972HP26

dead-letter having no statutory force at any time. The land and the property of the Cantonment after the Cantonments Act 1924, could only be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the said Act. It had further been … The bill was introduced in the Council of the Governor-General of India on 12th October 1888 and its Chapter V was headed 'Immoveable Property in Cantonments'. But subsequently due to some opposition this Chapter was omitted and … Government was prepared to pay and so offered a sum of Rupees 20,000/- as the value of the authorised structures standing on the said land.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2022

Vikas Singh Vs. Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Delhi Fire Service Act defines ‘building bye-laws’ to mean “the bye-laws made under Section 186 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924) or the bye-laws made under Section 349-A of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (66 … the extent of land-users or the standards of population density. …. 3 (7) Any reference in any other Chapter, except Chapter III, to the master plan or the zonal development plan shall be construed as a reference … BANERJEE J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 20th January 2016, passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1990

Chhagan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-09-1990

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN417; 1990WLN(UC)420

in detail.15. In General Officer, Commanding-in-Chief s case (supra) certain rules were fronted Under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. The rules are known as Cantonment Funds Servants Rules, 1937. Rule 5-C of these rules provides for transfer … with the approval of the board by the said officers and servants;(h) Prescribing, subject to the provisions of chapter VII, the taxes Under Section 105 to be levied in the municipality for municipal purposes, the circumstances in … of the Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinate and Ministerial Service) Rules, 1963 and Rule 20 of the Rajasthan Municipalities (Class IV Service) Rules, 1964 has been challenged.2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2003

Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Andhra Circle, Secunderabad Rep. by Exe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 181, 181(3), 181(4) and 280; ;Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; ;Record of the Rights Regulation Act - Sections 15(2); ;Land Revenue Act - Sections 158; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 79 - Order 27, Rule 3; ;Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1934 - Rules 3 and 10

Reported in : 2004(3)ALT27(SC); JT2003(9)SC316; 2003(10)SCALE33; (2003)12SCC315; (2004)1UPLBEC882

Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 have been trained by virtue of power vested under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. Rule 10 in Chapter III of the Cantonment Land Administration Rules deals with maintenance of General Land Register. … the order of the High Court. Union of India has also filed appeals, Civil Appeal Nos. 1107-1111 of 2001 impugning the judgment of the Division Bench. We are not favourably inclined to entertain this technical plea for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial