Advanced Search Results
Hem Chandra Naskar and anr. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jul-26-1928
Right to Information
118Ind.Cas.355
no application in view of the fact that the Bidyadhari river is subject to the operation of the Canal Act (V of 1864; and, therefore, under Section 91 of Act II of 1882 the last-mentioned Act has … the Bengal Embankment Act (II of 1882) and have each been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 or, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four months, and they have been further directed under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhitabhai Ghelabhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
May-02-1969
Civil
(1970)11GLR428
make laws relating to water, which would include water supplies, irrigation and canals, etc. subject to the provisions of Entry 56 of List I. It … the Government to make a provisional assessment, and by virtue of Section 3 of the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, 1864, the landholders may be liable to pay the tax. The Act being silent as to the machinery and … lake, natural collection of water or natural drainage-channel, to which the State Government may apply the provisions of Section 5, or of which the water has been applied or used before the passing of this Act for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoberts Vs. Northern Pacific R. Co.
US Supreme Court
Apr-22-1895
Land Acquisition
terminate doubts. The supreme court, in reaching this result, places its judgment upon the ground that highways, turnpikes, canals, and railroads, although owned by individuals under public grants or by private corporations, are publici juris, that they … under and by virtue of an Act of Congress approved July 2, 1864, against David E. Roberts, J. F. Ellis, and Euclid L. Johnson, wherein … owner, it being held in Hart v. Kucher, 5 Serg. & Rawle 1, that the claim is … WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Syllabus Where a railroad company, having the power of eminent domain, has entered into actual possession of lands necessary for its corporate purposes, whether with or without the consent of their owner, a … of the states. As is stated in Dillon's Municipal Corporations, vol. 1, sec. 158: "The Supreme Court of the United States, following repeated intimations of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chandi Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-23-1975
Constitution
Punjab Betterment Charges and Acreage Rates Act, 1952 - Sections 5A; Punjab Betterment Charges and Acreage Rates Rules, 1955 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
AIR1975P& H343
India Canal and Drainage Act, 1873 (VIII of 1873) apply; (ii) all canals, channels, reservoirs, wells, tubewells and lift irrigation arrangements constructed, maintained or controlled … the Government to make a provisional assessment, and by virtue of Section 3 of the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, 1864, the landholders may be liable to pay the tax. The Act being silent as to the machinery and … his choice to do so, he shall not be liable to pay advance payment of betterment charges, under Section 5-A, and if he has already paid any amount under Section 5-A, the advance payment payable under this section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSteamboat Company Vs. the Collector
US Supreme Court
Jan-01-1873
Land Acquisition
30, 1864, and acts amendatory thereof," by its ninth section, [ Footnote 5 ] amended the one hundred and third section of the Act of … existing in Page 85 U. S. 482 the other being put in italics. " ACT OF JUNE 30, 1864" "SECTION 103. That every person, firm, company, or corporation, owning or possessing, or having the care or management of, … every person, firm, company, or corporation, owning or possessing, or having the care or management of, any railroad, canal, steamboat, ship, barge, canal boat, or other vessel, or any stage coach or other vehicle, engaged or employed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Pacific R. Co. Vs. California
US Supreme Court
Mar-18-1896
Land Acquisition
July 1, 1862, c, 120, 12 Stat. 489; at of July 2, 1864, c. 216, 13 Stat. 356; Act of March 3, 1865, c. 88, … any value, should not be destroyed by the state in the exercise of its taxing power. For example, section 5 of the Act of July 1, 1862, provides that the issue and delivery of bonds to the company, … along, or upon any stream, water course, roadstead, bay, navigable stream, street, avenue, highway, or across any railway, canal, ditch, or flume; to cross, intersect, join, or unite its railroad with any other railroad at any point
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe New York
US Supreme Court
Nov-20-1899
Land Acquisition
waters was governed by the Congressional Rules and Regulations of April 29, 1864, Rev.Stat. § 4233, and, so far as the manoeuvers of the vessels … April 29, 1864, 13 Stat. 58, c. 69, reproduced in Revised Statutes, section 4233, and, so far at least as the manoevers of the respective … to vessels navigating the Great Lakes; but the cases are readily distinguishable. In that, the exception was "any canal boat, barge, or lighter, or to any vessel of any description used in rivers or inland navigation." It … not to those navigating the Great Lakes. A court of admiralty may properly take judicial notice of an act of the Parliament of Canada regulating the navigation of Canadian waters, passed in 1886, as a law of … with regard to the fault of the Conemaugh. 53 F. 553. Libellant soon thereafter moved for a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCorinne Mill Canal and Stock Co. Vs. Johnson
US Supreme Court
Mar-04-1895
Land Acquisition
of Congress of July 1, 1862, 12 Stat. 489, and July 2, 1864, 13 Stat., to aid in the construction of a railroad from the … Corinne Mill Canal & Stock Co. v. Johnson - 156 U.S. 574 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court Corinne Mill Canal & Stock … 4, 1895 156 U.S. 574 ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH Syllabus In an action to recover possession of land in Utah, the plaintiff set up that it was part of a grant … The grant to the railroad company was not of all the odd-numbered sections within twenty miles of its line of definite location, but of those … & Stock Co. v. Johnson - 156 U.S. 574 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court Corinne Mill Canal &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRailroad Company Vs. Rose
US Supreme Court
Jan-01-1877
Land Acquisition
tax was levied under sec. 122 of the Act of June 30, 1864, 13 Stat. 284, as amended by the Act of July 13, 1866, … This limitation was not in the original internal revenue Act of Aug. 5, 1861, 12 Stat. 292, although that act imposed the income tax. The … imposed by all those sections then to cease. The tax specified in sec. 122 was levied upon railroad, canal, turnpike, canal navigation, and slack water companies. The section did not include the tax upon the income of … are stated in the opinion of the Court. MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the Court. This action was brought by the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad Company. A demurrer to its petition was sustained
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Municipal Council of Vizagapatam Vs. William Foster
Chennai
Dec-14-1917
Land Acquisition
AIR1918Mad264(2); 44Ind.Cas.308
vide page 1340 (19d).5. The principle of liability in such oases was laid down in Parnaby v. Lancaster Canal Co. (1839) 11 Ad. & E. 223 : 52 R.R. 329. In that case it was laid down … that their powers are derived from the Government and are controlled by the provisions of the District Municipalities Act. I may draw attention in thin connection to the Act which created the first Municipality in this country. … Corporations are exempted from liability can apply to Indian Municipalities. The various sections to which Mr. Sarma drew our attention point to the conclusion that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »