Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: canals act 1864 section 5 · Page 1 of about 103 results (0.048 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 26 1928

Hem Chandra Naskar and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-26-1928

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : 118Ind.Cas.355

no application in view of the fact that the Bidyadhari river is subject to the operation of the Canal Act (V of 1864; and, therefore, under Section 91 of Act II of 1882 the last-mentioned Act has … the Bengal Embankment Act (II of 1882) and have each been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500 or, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four months, and they have been further directed under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1969

Chhitabhai Ghelabhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-02-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1970)11GLR428

make laws relating to water, which would include water supplies, irrigation and canals, etc. subject to the provisions of Entry 56 of List I. It … the Government to make a provisional assessment, and by virtue of Section 3 of the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, 1864, the landholders may be liable to pay the tax. The Act being silent as to the machinery and … lake, natural collection of water or natural drainage-channel, to which the State Government may apply the provisions of Section 5, or of which the water has been applied or used before the passing of this Act for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1895

Roberts Vs. Northern Pacific R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-22-1895

Subject : Land Acquisition

terminate doubts. The supreme court, in reaching this result, places its judgment upon the ground that highways, turnpikes, canals, and railroads, although owned by individuals under public grants or by private corporations, are publici juris, that they … under and by virtue of an Act of Congress approved July 2, 1864, against David E. Roberts, J. F. Ellis, and Euclid L. Johnson, wherein … owner, it being held in Hart v. Kucher, 5 Serg. & Rawle 1, that the claim is … WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Syllabus Where a railroad company, having the power of eminent domain, has entered into actual possession of lands necessary for its corporate purposes, whether with or without the consent of their owner, a … of the states. As is stated in Dillon's Municipal Corporations, vol. 1, sec. 158: "The Supreme Court of the United States, following repeated intimations of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 23 1975

Chandi Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-23-1975

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Punjab Betterment Charges and Acreage Rates Act, 1952 - Sections 5A; Punjab Betterment Charges and Acreage Rates Rules, 1955 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1975P& H343

India Canal and Drainage Act, 1873 (VIII of 1873) apply; (ii) all canals, channels, reservoirs, wells, tubewells and lift irrigation arrangements constructed, maintained or controlled … the Government to make a provisional assessment, and by virtue of Section 3 of the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, 1864, the landholders may be liable to pay the tax. The Act being silent as to the machinery and … his choice to do so, he shall not be liable to pay advance payment of betterment charges, under Section 5-A, and if he has already paid any amount under Section 5-A, the advance payment payable under this section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

1873

Steamboat Company Vs. the Collector

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1873

Subject : Land Acquisition

30, 1864, and acts amendatory thereof," by its ninth section, [ Footnote 5 ] amended the one hundred and third section of the Act of … existing in Page 85 U. S. 482 the other being put in italics. " ACT OF JUNE 30, 1864" "SECTION 103. That every person, firm, company, or corporation, owning or possessing, or having the care or management of, … every person, firm, company, or corporation, owning or possessing, or having the care or management of, any railroad, canal, steamboat, ship, barge, canal boat, or other vessel, or any stage coach or other vehicle, engaged or employed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1896

Central Pacific R. Co. Vs. California

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-18-1896

Subject : Land Acquisition

July 1, 1862, c, 120, 12 Stat. 489; at of July 2, 1864, c. 216, 13 Stat. 356; Act of March 3, 1865, c. 88, … any value, should not be destroyed by the state in the exercise of its taxing power. For example, section 5 of the Act of July 1, 1862, provides that the issue and delivery of bonds to the company, … along, or upon any stream, water course, roadstead, bay, navigable stream, street, avenue, highway, or across any railway, canal, ditch, or flume; to cross, intersect, join, or unite its railroad with any other railroad at any point

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1899

The New York

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-20-1899

Subject : Land Acquisition

waters was governed by the Congressional Rules and Regulations of April 29, 1864, Rev.Stat. § 4233, and, so far as the manoeuvers of the vessels … April 29, 1864, 13 Stat. 58, c. 69, reproduced in Revised Statutes, section 4233, and, so far at least as the manoevers of the respective … to vessels navigating the Great Lakes; but the cases are readily distinguishable. In that, the exception was "any canal boat, barge, or lighter, or to any vessel of any description used in rivers or inland navigation." It … not to those navigating the Great Lakes. A court of admiralty may properly take judicial notice of an act of the Parliament of Canada regulating the navigation of Canadian waters, passed in 1886, as a law of … with regard to the fault of the Conemaugh. 53 F. 553. Libellant soon thereafter moved for a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1895

Corinne Mill Canal and Stock Co. Vs. Johnson

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-04-1895

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Congress of July 1, 1862, 12 Stat. 489, and July 2, 1864, 13 Stat., to aid in the construction of a railroad from the … Corinne Mill Canal & Stock Co. v. Johnson - 156 U.S. 574 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court Corinne Mill Canal & Stock … 4, 1895 156 U.S. 574 ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH Syllabus In an action to recover possession of land in Utah, the plaintiff set up that it was part of a grant … The grant to the railroad company was not of all the odd-numbered sections within twenty miles of its line of definite location, but of those … & Stock Co. v. Johnson - 156 U.S. 574 (1895) U.S. Supreme Court Corinne Mill Canal &

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

1877

Railroad Company Vs. Rose

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1877

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax was levied under sec. 122 of the Act of June 30, 1864, 13 Stat. 284, as amended by the Act of July 13, 1866, … This limitation was not in the original internal revenue Act of Aug. 5, 1861, 12 Stat. 292, although that act imposed the income tax. The … imposed by all those sections then to cease. The tax specified in sec. 122 was levied upon railroad, canal, turnpike, canal navigation, and slack water companies. The section did not include the tax upon the income of … are stated in the opinion of the Court. MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the Court. This action was brought by the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad Company. A demurrer to its petition was sustained

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1917

The Municipal Council of Vizagapatam Vs. William Foster

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-14-1917

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1918Mad264(2); 44Ind.Cas.308

vide page 1340 (19d).5. The principle of liability in such oases was laid down in Parnaby v. Lancaster Canal Co. (1839) 11 Ad. & E. 223 : 52 R.R. 329. In that case it was laid down … that their powers are derived from the Government and are controlled by the provisions of the District Municipalities Act. I may draw attention in thin connection to the Act which created the first Municipality in this country. … Corporations are exempted from liability can apply to Indian Municipalities. The various sections to which Mr. Sarma drew our attention point to the conclusion that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial