Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: borstal school act 1963 section 3 · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 23 1980

Joginder Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-1980

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1218

and Girls Act, 1956, or of any law in force in any State relating to juvenile offenders or borstal schools.It is evident from the above that specific mention is made herein of Sub-section (2) of Section 5 … of operation of certain enactments-Nothing in this Act shall affect the provisions of Section 31 of the Reformatory Schools Act, 1887, or Sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, or the Suppression … 1914 would operate as an absolute bar against the application of Sections 360 and 361 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 or of Sections 4

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2003

Saidapalli Mogalaiah and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-2003

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 418; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD500; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)510

petitioners could have availed the benefits available to Juvenile prisoners such as Borstal Schools as they were minors at the time the judgment was rendered … could have availed the benefits available to Juvenile prisoners such as Borstal Schools as they were minors at the time the judgment was rendered by … basis of delay execution of warrant those grievances not available to them as on today. - SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 [C.A. No. 47/1963]. Sections 31 & 34: [Bilal Nazki, V.V.S. Rao & G. Chandraiah, JJ] [Per Court] Cancellation … reproduced:'2. On February 10, 1949 the Judge, Special Court, Red Fort, Delhi, convicted the petitioner for offences under Section 3, read with Section 6, of the Explosive Substances Act, under Section 4(b) and Section 5 thereof; and for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1978

Superintendent, Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. Bahubali

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-1978

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 6; Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 43; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 126-P(2); General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1979SC1271; 1979CriLJ862; 1979(4)ELT1(SC); (1979)2SCC279; [1979]1SCR1104; 1979(11)LC77(SC)

104 of 1956) and (4) of any law in force in any State relating to juvenile offenders or borstal schools, which prescribe a minimum sentence.7. The provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, being therefore, obviously … as required by Rule 126-H(2)(d)(ii) of the Defence of India (Amendment) Rules, 1963 relating to gold control (hereinafter referred to as 'the D.I. Rules') and … the offence and the character of the offender, it would not be desirable to deal with him under Section 3 or Section 4, and if the court passes any sentence of imprisonment on the offender it shall record … 1958 which saves the provisions of (1) Section 31 of the Reformatory Schools Act, 1897 (Act No. 8 of 1897), (2) Sub-section (2) of Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial