Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: borstal school act 1963 section 2 · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 23 1980

Joginder Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-1980

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1218

and Girls Act, 1956, or of any law in force in any State relating to juvenile offenders or borstal schools.It is evident from the above that specific mention is made herein of Sub-section (2) of Section 5 … of operation of certain enactments-Nothing in this Act shall affect the provisions of Section 31 of the Reformatory Schools Act, 1887, or Sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, or the Suppression

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2003

Saidapalli Mogalaiah and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-2003

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 418; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD500; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)510

the Court on 10-3-1969 both the petitioners could have availed the benefits available to Juvenile prisoners such as Borstal Schools as they were minors at the time the judgment was rendered by the High Court, however the … could have availed the benefits available to Juvenile prisoners such as Borstal Schools as they were minors at the time the judgment was rendered by … basis of delay execution of warrant those grievances not available to them as on today. - SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 [C.A. No. 47/1963]. Sections 31 & 34: [Bilal Nazki, V.V.S. Rao & G. Chandraiah, JJ] [Per Court] Cancellation … Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, the petitioners accused had been charged offences under Sections 302, 149 read with 34 of IPC. The Sessions Court gave its … petitioner herein were accused in Sessions Case No. 20 of 1967 which was decided by Additional Sessions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1978

Superintendent, Central Excise, Bangalore Vs. Bahubali

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-1978

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 6; Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 43; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 126-P(2); General Clauses Act - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1979SC1271; 1979CriLJ862; 1979(4)ELT1(SC); (1979)2SCC279; [1979]1SCR1104; 1979(11)LC77(SC)

104 of 1956) and (4) of any law in force in any State relating to juvenile offenders or borstal schools, which prescribe a minimum sentence.7. The provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, being therefore, obviously … of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 which saves the provisions of (1) Section 31 of the Reformatory Schools Act, 1897 (Act No. 8 of 1897), (2) Sub-section (2) of Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption … as required by Rule 126-H(2)(d)(ii) of the Defence of India (Amendment) Rules, 1963 relating to gold control (hereinafter referred to as 'the D.I. Rules') and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial