Advanced Search Results

Ajaib Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22

Reported in : 1997(40)DRJ710

under Section 11(2) could not have been exercised without complying with the requirement of Rule 22 of the Border Security Force Rules, which reads: '22.Dismissal of removal of persons other than officers on account of mis-conduct :- (1)WHENit is proposed … (FN) in terms of Section 11(2) of the Bsf Act, 1968 read with Rule 177 of Bsf Rules 1969.(2)Period of absence from 19.11.1993 to 8.7.94 (AN) be treated as `Dies Non'.(3)A sum of Rs. 492-98 (Rupees four

Jitender Singh (Ex. Head Const) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 12, 19 and 122; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 20, 22, 22(2), 22(3), 22(4) and 28A and 177; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(93)DRJ108

writ petition is disposed of in the above terms, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968Section 12 - Border Security Force Rules--1969--Rules 28A and 177--Dismissal for overstaying from leave--Administrative order--No enquiry conducted--Non … The power of the respondents to dismiss or remove a person other than the Officer, in accordance with Rule 22 is questioned. The grievance is with regard to the method in which the power has been exercised. The

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), 74(5) and 115; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 22, 160 and 161

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN638

to the Commandant (SHQ), the Officiating DIG of the concerned area, in terms of Rule 160 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969. After going through the proceedings of SSFC, the said authority differed with the findings of the SSFC and … the weight of evidence. The said authority went on to direct the Commandant to invoke the provision of Rule 22 of the Border Security Force Rules and to proceed to terminate the services of the writ petitioner administratively

Yacub Kispotta and Others Vs. Director General BSF and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 51, Section 64, Section 70, Section 74, Section 170, Section 171, Section 173, Section 174, Section 175 -Border Security Force Rules, 1969- Rule 22,Rule 48, Rule 51(2) €“ Termination - Respondent/Border Security Forcedismissed Petitionersfrom its services without holding any inquiry or

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

There has been gross violation of the procedure prescribed under Rules 45-B, 48, 51-A and 59 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969.6. It is on the above premises that the challenge is made to conviction and sentence awarded to the … of Army Act, namely, conduct prejudicial to good order and military discipline. For which he was heard under Rule 22 of the Army Rules. However, during trial by the General Court Martial he was called upon to face

Suresh Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 62

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR422(Jhr)]

month, by six months as he was suffering from Lumbo Sciatica Syndrome. Relying on Rule 22 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, it is submitted that departmental proceeding should have been initiated against him before passing the impugned order of

Ex-constable Ramvir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 22, 63 and 117; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 41; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 157; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(16)SCALE253; (2009)3SCC97:2009AIRSCW163:2009(1)LHSC93

a counsel has never been raised by appellant and as admittedly, in terms of Rule 157 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, one Shri Ashim Biswas, Assistant Commandant was detailed as a friend of the accused in the trial, the … he was in prison, it does not come within the purview of 'misconduct' within the meaning of Section 22 of the Act.8. Mr. A. Sharan, learned Additional Solicitor General, on the other hand, submitted:i. Appellant being in

Chokha Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 22; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48, 48(3), 49(3), 51, 59 to 64, 142(1), 142(2) and 157

Reported in : 110(2004)DLT268; 2004(73)DRJ450; 2004(3)SLJ44(Delhi)

B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. The petitioner, a constable in Border Security Force(BSF), was on 11th of February, 2002, at about 8.00 p.m. ordered by Assistant Commandant, Shri Rajiv Bhardwaj, Company … 20.2.2002, Shri S.K.Wadhwa, Commandant, ordered assembly of Summary Security Force Court(SSFC) on 22nd of February, 2002 at 10.00 a.m. at Headquarters, 19 Bn. BSF, Amritsar … In the course of hearing, much emphasis was laid on alleged violation of Rule 63 of the BSF Rules 1969 (for short `Rules') on the grounds that the copies of proceedings and charge sheet were not supplied to

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was not afforded an opportunity of being heard though he sent a number … Dies Non is under challenge in the present petition. While working as Constable in 105 Bn. Of the Border Security Force, petitioner left for his home in 1999. It is alleged that he applied for leave which was orally … petitioner continued to remain absent action was initiated against him under Section 11 of BSF Act read with Rule 22(2) and 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 on the administrative side. A show cause notice was served on

Joga Singh Nk/Dva Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 63(4) and 157; Border Security Force Rules, 1959 - Rule 157; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : (1995)111PLR323

this Court in Surinder Singh v. Union of India and Ors., 1994(3) S.L.R. 390.7. Rule 63 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 provides as under:- '63. Preparation of defence by the accused - (1) An accused, who has been remanded … been complied with. Learned counsel has also submitted that the provisions of Rule 157 are ultra vires Articles 22 of the Constitution. He further submits that there is no evidence on the basis of which the charges