Advanced Search Results

Bhushan Singh and anr. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force (BSF) Rules 1969 - Rules 45-B, 51; Border Security Force (BSF) Act - Sections 113, 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

cancelled. The petitioners shall surrender forthwith to serve the remaining sentence. 35. We refrain from imposing any costs. Border Security Force (BSF) Rules 1969 - Rule 45-B -- Besides examining other persons the COI examined the prosecutrix and her brother Joy Dev Sarkar

Ex.Ct.Ram Phal Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force (BSF) Rules 1969 - Rule 45

reinstatement pending trial would be reckoned. 22. The petitioner would be reinstated forthwith. 23. No costs. 24. Dasti. Border Security Force (BSF) Rules 1969 - Rule 45 -- That while responding to him, Ct.Satbir Singh used uncivilised language. Due to uncivilised language used

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

to Border Security Force he was put up on offence report for alleged commission of following offences under Rule 45 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 before the Commandant:(a) Deserting the service; (b) Committing a Civil Offence … Pramod Kohli, J. 1. Petitioner was serving in Border Security Force as Constable. While on active duty he was apprehended by the Civil Police for his involvement in the … the Court, it also contains a certificate at the bottom that the provisions of Rule 142 (2) of BSF Rules 1969 have been complied with. Page 54 is a document containing the details of the officers who were present

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

remedy provided under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with Rule 167 of the BSF Rules, 1969, which is statutory in nature. It is alleged in the reply that the petitioner while officiating as Coy … Permod Kohli, J.1. Petitioner was serving in 5th Bn Border Security Force in 1994 as Subedar (Inspector). A charge-sheet came to be served upon him containing the following charge:APPENDIX VIRULE … held and even the petitioner was not heard in terms of Rule 45B nor a fresh ROE] was ordered and prepared in terms of Rule

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

petition) was confirmed vide order dated 10.6.91 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) passed by the Inspector General of Border Security Force (for short BSF) Tripura, Cachar and Mizoram Frontier (Confirming Authority) and the communication being No. 6/57/97-Pet/CIO (D&L;)/BSF/O-14 dated … time, the respondents shall not raise any question of limitation in the light of Rule 168 of the BSF Rules, 1969. We hope that the competent authorities will consider the matter and dispose of the appeal within a period … martial. In support of his aforesaid contention he placed reliance in paragraph 45 of the case of Lt. Col. Prithi Pal Singh Bedi v. Union

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16(7), 45B and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Army Act; Border Security Force Act - Sections 2(1), 5, 14 to 45, 48 and 141; Navy Act; Armed Forces Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC1416; 2003(3)AWC1948(SC); (2003)3CALLT15(SC); [2003(97)FLR1034]; 2003(3)JKJ41[SC]; JT2003(3)SC201; 2003(3)SCALE8; (2003)4SCC531; [2003]2SCR721; 2003(2)SLJ395(SC);

S.B. Sinha, J.1. The Border Security Force (BSF) has a Training center and School (TCS) in the District of Hazaribagh. The said training center is one … it under Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act made rules known as the Border Security Force Rules, 1969. Some of the provisions of the Rules are in the following terms:14A Ranks-(1) The officers and other members … view to achieve the said purpose. It is not in dispute having regard to the phraseology used in Rule 45 B of the Rules that an accused at the first instance is bound to the tried by his

Union of India and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 Rules 45-B, 46, 48 and 51A; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227(4) and 311(2)

Reported in : 91(2001)DLT581; 2001(58)DRJ765

acted in accordance with the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969. The appellant also submitted that the respondent was given full opportunity to defend himself in this case including … under:-3. respondent B.N. Jha, on 19.7.1990 was posted as Dy. Commandant in the Basis Training Centre of the Border Security Force, Training Centre and School (for short hereinafter referred as TC&S;) at Hazaribagh. The TC&S; had three wings which … Jha.34. The learned Single Judge has observed that there is a clear violation of Rule 45B of the BSF Rules. He further observed that according to the mandate of Rule 45B, the Commandant after hearing the officer can … This rule has been flouted. The direction of Mr. Garcha is contrary to the mandate of Rule 45B. Rule 45-B reads as under:45B. Hearing of charge against an officer and a subordinate officer. -(1)(a) The charge against an

r.s. Kadian vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

3010/2010 Page 1 of 45 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioner who is a Commandant with the Border Security Force (‗BSF‘) has, in the first writ petition W.P. (C) 19014 of 2006, challenged an order dated 2nd February, 2006 … On 9th September 2006, all of a sudden the... Petitioner was issued a SCN under Rule 20(4)(d) of BSF Rules, 1969 read with Section 10 of BSF Act. There was no material on the basis of which the said

r.s.kadian vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

3010/2010 Page 1 of 45 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioner who is a Commandant with the Border Security Force (‗BSF‘) has, in the first writ petition W.P. (C) 19014 of 2006, challenged an order dated 2nd February, 2006 … On 9th September 2006, all of a sudden the... Petitioner was issued a SCN under Rule 20(4)(d) of BSF Rules, 1969 read with Section 10 of BSF Act. There was no material on the basis of which the said

Head Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 107 and 108; Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rule 48; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 304A; Evidence Act - Sections 24

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2585

ORDER1. The petitioner, Hardev Singh, was posted as Head Constable in 67 Battalion, Border Security Force (hereinafter to be referred as 'the BSF') at Baghapurana in October, 1991. In the night intervening 24/25th October, … petitioner also prayed for issuance of a writ, order or directions declaring that Rules 63 (2), 105(4)(5) of BSF Rules 1969 are ultra vires of Section 113 of the BSF Act as well as Articles 21, 33 and 50 … who was produced before the Commandant/respondent No. 5 on 30-11-1991 on offence report. Charge was heard under BSF Rule 45 and thereafter the preparation of record of evidence was ordered on 30-11-1991 itself. The contention of the respondents