Advanced Search Results

Sudesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 62

Reported in : 1997(42)DRJ623

that disciplinary action would be taken against him. Thereafter a Court of Inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 was ordered to inquire into the absence of the petitioner, but without awaiting the outcome thereof, it appears … failing he was apprised that disciplinary action would be taken against him. Thereafter a Court of Inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 was ordered to inquire into the absence of the petitioner,

Assadullah Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 62; ; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 173(8)

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ178

the dismissal order. According to the appellant, he was denied due opportunity of hearing as provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 framed thereunder. The order being in violation of the statutory rules … of the Commandant to pass the impugned order.5. On behalf of the respondents, it was submitted that under Section 62 of the BSF Act, it is mandatory to hold court of inquiry in all cases of unauthorized

Suresh Prasad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 62

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR422(Jhr)]

he reported for duty nor sent any information/reply to the said letters. As per Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, Court of inquiry was ordered vide Officer Order No. 13271-76 dated 27.12.2003 and apprehension roll was also issued … leave address but neither he reported for duty nor sent any information/reply to the said letters. As per Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, Court of inquiry was ordered vide Officer Order No. 13271-76

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was … has been treated as Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer … Ftr HQ BSF, Jammu. Further according to the respondents, as per Section 62 of BSF Act and BSF Rules 170 to 176, One Man Court … ORDERV.K. Jhanji, J.1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, challenge is to order No. Estt/56 BN/DISC/94/7472-84 dated 9.6.1984, passed

Sees Ram Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2)

Reported in : 63(1996)DLT890; 1996(38)DRJ663

by the Commandant, 67 Bn., Border Security Force in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11(2) of (he Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') along with all consequential reliefs. (2) The petitioner was enlisted as Constable … service dated 6.3.1991 passed by the Commandant, 67 Bn., Border Security Force in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11(2) of (he Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') along with all consequential … set aside in as much as the Court of Inquiry under Section 62 of the Act could be held only, if the whereabouts of the

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the … On completion of 30 days absence, a CGI was ordered under Section 62 of the BSF Act. In view of the opinion of the Court

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails … Summary Security Force Court (hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence … have been relied upon by the respondents. It is noteworthy that Rule 62(h) of the BSF Rules, 1969 casts a duty on the officer of

Ex-naik Rajeshwar Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force (BSF) Act 1968 - Sections 62, 11; Border Security Force (BSF) Rules - Rules 22, 177

opinion of the Commandant that retention of the petitioner in service was undesirable and since his trial by security force court was held to be inexpedient and impracticable and therefore there is no illegality or irregularity in passing … sufficient power in the respondents to do so. The source of power is Section 62 of the BSF Act 1968. Needless to state the proceedings of the Court of Inquiry evidenced petitioner being on unauthorized absence. It was … power in the respondents to do so. The source of power is Section 62 of the BSF Act 1968. Needless to state the proceedings of

Sham Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11, 11(2), 19, 21(1) and 62; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 22, 22(2), 22(3), 173(8) and 177; Border Security Force (Amendment) Rules, 1990

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)6; 96(2002)DLT602; 2002(62)DRJ361; 2003(1)SLJ48(Delhi)

Matched in: Citation 2002IVAD(Delhi)6; 96(2002)DLT602; 2002(62)DRJ361; 2003(1)SLJ48(Delhi)