Advanced Search Results

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … made by Security Force Court and no such Court was constituted. The order passed by Commandant under Section 11(2) of the Act read with Rule 177 of the Rules of 1969 cannot be upheld. It was also … granted to him.4. The appellant as plaintiff after serving a notice under Section 80 of the CPC and as no redress was given to him,

Sees Ram Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2)

Reported in : 63(1996)DLT890; 1996(38)DRJ663

by the Commandant, 67 Bn., Border Security Force in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11(2) of (he Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') along with all consequential reliefs. (2) The petitioner was enlisted as Constable … service dated 6.3.1991 passed by the Commandant, 67 Bn., Border Security Force in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11(2) of (he Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') along with all consequential

B.V. Ramnarayan Vs. State Bank of India, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Rule 92; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2)

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT753; (1997)ILLJ1007AP

in the Border Security Force was dismissed from service by the Commandant acting under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 on the ground that he was a deserter, without holding enquiry. Before the Supreme Court, the questions were … who was a constable in the Border Security Force was dismissed from service by the Commandant acting under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 on the ground that he was a deserter, without holding

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), 74(5) and 115; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 22, 160 and 161

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN638

not be terminated, by virtue of the powers vested in the said Commandant under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with Rule 22 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969. It was also observed that considering the … why his services should not be terminated, by virtue of the powers vested in the said Commandant under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with Rule 22 of the Border Security Force Rules,

Sham Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11, 11(2), 19, 21(1) and 62; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 22, 22(2), 22(3), 173(8) and 177; Border Security Force (Amendment) Rules, 1990

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)6; 96(2002)DLT602; 2002(62)DRJ361; 2003(1)SLJ48(Delhi)

of the aforesaidconclusions, I hold that there is no merit in thiswrit petition and the writ petition standsdismissed. Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 11(2)--Border Security Force Rules, 1969--Rule 22--Dismissal from service--Petitioner, unauthorisedly absent and did not report for duty--Show … by the competent authority.Thereafter, the respondents decided to proceedagainst him and accordingly charge-sheets wereissued to the petitioner under Section 19(b) of theBSF Act and Section 21(1) of the BSF Act. In oneof the charge sheets the allegation

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer … ORDERV.K. Jhanji, J.1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, challenge is to order No. Estt/56 BN/DISC/94/7472-84 dated 9.6.1984, passed

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was … has been treated as Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security … petitioner continued to remain absent action was initiated against him under Section 11 of BSF Act read with Rule 22(2) and 177 of the BSF

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area … 9 p.m. in which the delinquent had allegedly committed the offence under Sections 20 (a), 20 (b) and 20 (c) of BSF Act. Accordingly, a … availability of alternate remedy. The petitioner then presented his representation under Section 117 of BSF Act and on 20.2.2000 it was dismissed by Deputy Inspector

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the … by 17 days when he was granted 10 days casual leave w.e.f. 11 June 90 to 23 June 90. The period of overstayal was regularized … service is undesirable. I, therefore, DISMISS him from service with effect from 28 Dec 1992 (FN) under Rule 177 of BSF Rules 1969. His absence

Sukhwinder Singh Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20(3), 214, 226 and 241

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3892

of Jammu. (2) The petitioner has not exhausted the remedy available to him under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 against his conviction and sentence. Thus, the petitioner has not availed of the aforesaid statutory remedy and, thereforee, … took a decision to investigate and try. So far as challenge on the grounds of the provisions of Sections 80 and 81 of the Border Security Force Act are concerned, the stand of the respondents is that … the deceased declined to take, which irritated the petitioner. Thereafter at about 11.15 p.m. the deceased along with Sub-Inspector Dayal Singh and H.C. Kesar Singh