Advanced Search Results

Sukhwant Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 98; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 48

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)77; 1996CriLJ4079; 1996(38)DRJ299

about the said design to his superior officer. Proceedings before General Security Force Court were held under the Border Security Force Act,1968. After affording full opportunity to the petitioner, the proceeding of conviction was submitted. Authority sentenced the petitioner to … have been given to arrive at that finding urged that under Rule 98 member of the General Security Force Court were not required to assign … Usha Mehra, J. (1) This petitioner was charged with three offences punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter called the 'Act of 1988'). The first charge against

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

petition) was confirmed vide order dated 10.6.91 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) passed by the Inspector General of Border Security Force (for short BSF) Tripura, Cachar and Mizoram Frontier (Confirming Authority) and the communication being No. 6/57/97-Pet/CIO (D&L;)/BSF/O-14 dated … Security Force Court, not in criminal court, and the appellant/petitioner was charged under Section 46 of the BSF Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') for committing a civil offence that is to say committed an offence of rape, … may make rules consistent with the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Army Act, Navy and the Air Force Act and other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force. He

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could not be established and a fresh charge under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for committing offence in terms of Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 came to be

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails

Devender Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

by this Court be paid within four weeks. With these directions and observations, the writ petition is allowed. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 22-E and 40 - Difference between “misconduct reinstatement” and illegal termination - misconduct reinstatement refers to

Ex. Const. Badan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : BSF Rules - Rule 25; BSF Act, 1968; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rules 38, 38(1), 49 and 54(2); Fundamental Rules - Rule 9(21); defense Services Regulations - Rule 48

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)553; 97(2002)DLT986; 2002(64)DRJ849

thereforee, loses all relevance.2. The facts in this unfortunate case are that the petitioner was enrolled in the Border Security Force on 12.6.1990. In March 1997 it was discovered by the Respondents that the petitioner was suffering form HIV … SHQ BSF Gujarat letter No. Med/SHQ/BSF/Guj/98/1228 dated 20 Nov'98.3. Now thereforee, in exercise of the powers under BSF Act 1968, Rule-25 No. 90254763 Constable Badan Singh of 163 Bn BSF is hereby ordered to retire form service with … element and a disability element in accordance with the regulations in this section;'In respect of accidents the following rules will be observed:-(a) .....(b) .....(c) A

Ajaib Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22

Reported in : 1997(40)DRJ710

under challenge on numerous grounds, including the one that the same is contrary to the provisions of the Border Security Force Act and the Rules framed there under and the same has been passed without complying with the procedure prescribed … thereforee, dismiss him from service with effect from 9-7-94 (FN) in terms of Section 11(2) of the Bsf Act, 1968 read with Rule 177 of Bsf Rules 1969.(2)Period of absence from 19.11.1993 to 8.7.94 (AN) be treated as

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi in Criminal Complaint No.101 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and

Chokha Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 22; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48, 48(3), 49(3), 51, 59 to 64, 142(1), 142(2) and 157

Reported in : 110(2004)DLT268; 2004(73)DRJ450; 2004(3)SLJ44(Delhi)

all subjected to any cross-examination on behalf of the petitioner. 8. In terms of Section 21 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, where any person subject to the Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a willful defiance

Rajinder Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Act, 1968 - Sections 21; Border Security Force (SOs and UOs) Promotion and Seniority Rules, 1975 - Rules 5 and 21; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT267; 2008(101)DRJ207; 2008(3)SLJ388(Delhi)

filing of the present writ petition may be summarized as under:3. The Petitioner was a Sub-Inspector in the Border Security Force (for short 'the BSF'). At the time of undergoing Platoon Commander (Tactics) Course (hereinafter referred to as 'PC(TAC)') … Headquarter, would have lead the Respondent's to issue disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner under Section 21 Border Security Act, 1968, which reads as under:21. Disobedience to superior officer. - (1) Any person subject to this ACT who disobeys … Petitioner was detailed to undergo the JLC, which commenced on 4th May 98 at STC BSF Tekanpur and, the Petitioner was given sufficient opportunity to