Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. S.S. Ranade

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2 and 141; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 3, 6, 7 and 9; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) (Amendment) Rules, 1989; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR492]; JT1995(2)SC582; 1995(3)SCALE65; (1995)4SCC462; [1995]3SCR773; (1995)3UPLBEC1499

the security of the borders of India and matters connected therewith, are governed by the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act enables the Central Government, by notification, to make rules for the … 785 9. Assistant Commandant (duty posts) (Rs. 2200-4000) 1111 10. Deputation Reserve in the rank of Assistant Commandant 96 11. Probationers Reserve in the rank of Assistant Commandant 93 Total 2546From the above documents it is clear

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area Kanzalawan,

Devender Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

by this Court be paid within four weeks. With these directions and observations, the writ petition is allowed. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 22-E and 40 - Difference between “misconduct reinstatement” and illegal termination - misconduct reinstatement refers to

EX.CT. Dharam Pal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. The petitioner was enrolled with the Border Security Force on August 17, 1990 as a Constable. In the year 2005 he was posted with the 85th Bn. … listing the following charge against the petitioner: Place and date of offenceOffenceB.O.P. 24-O Forward 85 Bn. BSF. 16.05.2005BSF Act-1968-Section 16 (c) in that he, at Naka Point No.2 of BOP 24-O Fwd on 16.05.05 at about 21:40

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer

Barad Kesar Bhai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Family

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 19; Border Security Force Rules - Rule 22 and 22(2)

a report was submitted recommending that the petitioner be declared a deserter and disciplinary action as per the Border Security Force Act and the Rules be taken against him. On receipt of the report of enquiry as aforesaid, the Commandant … which has been subsequently upheld by the Appellate Authority under the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968.4. I have heard Sri R.L. Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Dasgupta, learned Additional … to the petitioner in the present case.6. Under the provisions contained in Section 19 of the Border Security Force Act, absence without leave is an

Amol Singh vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, by the Petitioner/ Sh. Amol Singh an erstwhile Constable in the Border Security Force (‘BSF’) assailing the Impugned Order dated 21.04.2022 passed by the Commandant of 112 BN BSF, whereby the Petitioner … was serving in 112 Battalion,BSF when he was charged under Sections 31(b), 40 and 22(e) of the BSF Act, 1968, as under: -1st Charge EXACTING MONEY FROM A PERSONBSF ACT 1968 WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORITYU/S - 31{b) in that … the petitioner was serving in 112 Battalion,BSF when he was charged under Sections 31(b), 40 and 22(e) of the BSF Act, 1968, as under: -1st

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

excludes the jurisdiction exercisable by the procedure applicable to Army Act, Navy Act, Air Force Act and the Border Security Act. By such exclusion, the court martial was competent even to make trial of the individual when the … SCC 161). Though it related to Sections 64, 70, 74, 117(1)(2) and 141 of the Border Security Forces Act 1968, the question was whether the court was to give reasons in support of its verdict. Placing reliance on … was found guilty of Charge Nos. 1 and 2 under Navy Act Section 60(d), Charge Nos. 8 and 9 under Navy Act Section 54(2), Charge

Ajit Kumar Singh Through Smt. Poonam Singh Wife and Pairokar vs Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was recorded in the presence and hearing of the accused/petitioner under the provisions of Rule 48 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (“Rules”).12. Mr. Pawar in his rejoinder submissions has argued that thechargesheet along with the findings and … Society, Gurdaspur (Punjab7. The newly constituted ICC conducted the enquiry as per POSH Actand the Border Security Forces Act, 1968 (“BSF Act”) and issued its findings and opinion dated 26.05.2025 wherein the petitioner was found to be blameworthy … directing the Respondents to reconstitute the Internal Complaints Committee in terms of Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of WomenSigned By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 3064/2026 Page … dated 24.08.2012, Sumit Kumar v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 96/2017 dated 29.03.2017 and Sunil Kumar v. TheSigned By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 3064/2026 Page

Dr. Amar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rule, 1983 - Rule 4; Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rules 1953 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2004P& H67; (2003)135PLR348

of death of such persons their widows and in theabsence of widows their children.Two per cent(iii) Defence personnel Border Security Force Personnel, Memberof the Central Reserve Police Force, Ex-Servicemen and War Widows havingdomicile in the State of Punjab.Eight per … 29.9.1995 of 10 sites for shop-cum-flats without holding the draw of lots. Petitioner No. 4 challenged the aforesaid action of the respondents in a Civil Suit and sought permanent injunction against the Trust restraining it from holding … are so framed so as to cater to the persons of all sections of Society.4. In paragraph 25 of the writ petition, it is stated