Advanced Search Results

Rabindranath Mishra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2008Ori19

ghaty receive such pay, pension and other remuneration, as may be prescribed.There are also similar provision in the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 etc.14. In the case of Akhilesh Prasad v. Union Territory of … CISF, Assam Rifles, Indo-Tibetan Border Security Force, S.S. B. Security Force and Rapid Action Force. In this regard, Section 3 of the C.R.P.F. Act 1949, is liable to be perused. The same is reproduced as under:3. Constitution … reserved under military category as per D. O. No. 3457 AS (R) 94 dated 3-6-1994 issued by Military of Defence, Government of India.Priority-I : Widows/wards

Ajaib Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22

Reported in : 1997(40)DRJ710

under challenge on numerous grounds, including the one that the same is contrary to the provisions of the Border Security Force Act and the Rules framed there under and the same has been passed without complying with the procedure prescribed … thereforee, dismiss him from service with effect from 9-7-94 (FN) in terms of Section 11(2) of the Bsf Act, 1968 read with Rule 177 of Bsf Rules 1969.(2)Period of absence from 19.11.1993 to 8.7.94 (AN) be treated as

V.S. Hamsa Vs. Director General, Border Security Force and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : CriminalLimitation

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 3 and 77; Army Act - Sections 123 and 123(2); Constitution of India - Article 32; Army Rules

Reported in : 1997CriLJ878

is no longer a member of the Border Security Force and therefore any proceedings initiated under the B.S.F. Act, 1968 are void and the appellant cannot be subjected to any such proceedings.2. The above argument is based on … Delhi on the ground that these proceedings are illegal and void. The appellant was a member of the Border Security Force and he retired from that service on 31-10-93. According to respondents, in an enquiry conducted by the D.I.G. … be subjected to any such proceedings.2. The above argument is based on Section 3 of the B.S.F. Act. Under Section 3 it is stated that

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer … his new place of posting, i.e. 56 BN BSF, and was also informed vide registered letter No. Estt/56/Absent/ 94/3981-82 dated 29.3.1994 at his home address to join his duty forthwith with information to Ftr HQ BSF, Jammu.

EX.CT. Dharam Pal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. The petitioner was enrolled with the Border Security Force on August 17, 1990 as a Constable. In the year 2005 he was posted with the 85th Bn. … listing the following charge against the petitioner: Place and date of offenceOffenceB.O.P. 24-O Forward 85 Bn. BSF. 16.05.2005BSF Act-1968-Section 16 (c) in that he, at Naka Point No.2 of BOP 24-O Fwd on 16.05.05 at about 21:40

Constable Basavaraj Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 117 and 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 311; Border Security Force Rules

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR468]; ILR2005KAR3513

Petitioner from service on the ground that he was found guilty of charge under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act').2. The Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-(a) to quash the order of dismissal … Writ Petition and also cited the following decisions:-(i) Pritam Singh v. Union of India and Ors., 2004(7) Supreme 94 on the point that compulsory retiring of the Appellant-Head Clerk from the Northern Railways service was held as

Director General, Border Security Force and ors. Vs. Iboton Singh (Kh)

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

lodged by the Coy. Commander, Moreh Coy. The BSF authorities exercised their discretion, under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'BSF Act'), to institute a General Security Force Court (in short, 'GSFC'). A GSFC was accordingly

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … used to earn Rs. 50,000-60,000 per year.43. P.P. Sharma, Deputy Commandant (PW-24), 94 Battalion, BSF, Kashmir proved the Ex.PW-24/A. He spoke about members of the … Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi in Criminal Complaint No.101 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 446, 451, 475, 475(1) and 482; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 80 and 81; Border Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3 to 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 337; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 9; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125 and 126

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)433; 96(2002)DLT217; 2002(62)DRJ16

by the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, dismissing application moved by the Commanding Officer under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, 'BSF Act') read with BSF Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the … Sir,Kindly refer to Summon No. 31/93 dated 13.7.94.2. The aforementioned Summons recd. at this HQ on 12 AUG, 94. Whereas, as per Summons the date of hearing already expired on 13.7.94. Due to late receipt Summon the