Advanced Search Results

Sandeep Malik Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 91(4)

Reported in : 1995IIAD(Delhi)209; 1995(34)DRJ9

years and dismissal from service.(2) The petitioner was tried by General Security Force Court under Sec.47 of the Border Security Force Act read with Sec.376 IPC. The statutory petition before respondent no.2 / Director General of Bsf was also rejected.(3) … of a Security Force Court, the Law Officer or, as the case may be, the officer approved under section 83 or the Commandant of the accused person may, by summons under his hand, require the attendance, at … possession or power, the summons shall describe it with reasonable precision.'(7) Section 91(4) deals with cases when the witness resides in a tribal area or

Assadullah Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 62; ; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 173(8)

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ178

the dismissal order. According to the appellant, he was denied due opportunity of hearing as provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 framed thereunder. The order being in violation of the statutory rules … The short facts of the case are that upon his transfer to 91 Battalion of the Force, the appellant was granted thirty days' earned leave … of the Commandant to pass the impugned order.5. On behalf of the respondents, it was submitted that under Section 62 of the BSF Act, it is mandatory to hold court of inquiry in all cases of unauthorized

Const. Jaibir Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 45; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149, 120B

u/s 20(a) i.e. using criminal force to his superior (first charge) and Section 26 intoxication (second charge) of BORDER SECURITY FORCE Act 1968. All the three accused persons pleaded not guilty of 1st charge and guilty of 2nd charge, hence competent … the disc. Case Record of Evidence so prepared be disposed off accordingly and BORDER SECURITY FORCE Rule 36 91) may be complied with and accordingly vide SHC BORDER SECURITY FORCE Cooch Behar further vide their O.No.1010/3/Estt/SHQ-CBR/03/13875-78 dated

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer

P.B.Bansal Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act 1968 - Sections 108, 11(1)

the trial was sent to the Inspector General BSF for confirmation as contemplated by Section 108 of the Border Security Force Act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "The Act"). Vide order dated 28.04.1995, exercising powers under Section 113 of the Act,

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

petition) was confirmed vide order dated 10.6.91 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) passed by the Inspector General of Border Security Force (for short BSF) Tripura, Cachar and Mizoram Frontier (Confirming Authority) and the communication being No. 6/57/97-Pet/CIO (D&L;)/BSF/O-14 dated … Security Force Court, not in criminal court, and the appellant/petitioner was charged under Section 46 of the BSF Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') for committing a civil offence that is to say committed an offence of rape, … may make rules consistent with the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Army Act, Navy and the Air Force Act and other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force. He

Satnarain Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

preparation of record of evidence. On considering the ROE the petitioner was directed to be tried at Summary Security Force Court. Chargesheet was drawn and petitioner was charged as under :“BSF ACT-1968 COMMITTING A CIVIL OFFENCE, THAT SECTION-46 … posted in 52 Battalion, BSF on January 06, 2009. During February 2011 the petitioner was deployed at Indo-Bangladesh Border at BOP Rajanagar of ‘A’ Coy of 52 Battalion BSF when certain cases against unit personnel were noticed … The petitioner Ex-Constable Satnarain Singh of 52 Battalion BSF was attached with 91 Battalion BSF vide order No.Pers./31-E/Disc/52 Bn/2011/1452-60 dated March 17, 2011 on disciplinary

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the … by granting leave.(c) The Constable overstayed by 48 days from 6 Feb 91 to 25 Mar 91 when he was granted 27 days Earned Leave

Atul Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19, 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : 2002(5)SLR618

India through proper channel for acceptance of his resignation from service in terms of Section 8 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act and Rules). In response to the

Janardan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Navy Act 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

in Force Custody and reduced his rank from Head Constable to Constable.16. As per Section 107 of The Border Security Force Act 1968 a finding or sentence by a Security Force Court has to be confirmed and a revision also lies … Security Force Court which tried the accused No.67001708 HC Janardhan Sharma of 25 Bn. BSF from 18 April 91 to 07 May 91, will reassemble at HQRs 25 Bn. BSF, Chhawla Camp, New Delhi on the 10th