Advanced Search Results

Dula Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20 and 21

Reported in : (2000)126PLR609

no show cause notice was served upon the plaintiff. Counsel further contended that under Section 11 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with rules 20 and 21 of The Border Security Force Rules, … declared deserter. Defendant further submitted that the plaintiff remained wilfully and deliberately absent from duty for more than 90 days and as such he was dismissed from service. Defendant also questioned the territorial jurisdiction of Civil Court

Kali Das Vs. Union of India

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilConstitution

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN577

pressed before us.18. In the result, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Enquiry--Desired officers not willing and available due to exigencies of service--Officer appointed and Private Counsel permitted to … sweeper. He was tried by General Security Force Court from 10th Jan., 90 to 30th Jan., 90. It is stated that while he was working … Court of enquiry was ordered and witnesses were examined by the court of enquiry and a charge-sheet Under Section 30(b) for misappropriating fund of Rs. 42,602.84 was issued on 17.10.86 vide Ex. 6 but the petitioner was

Chokha Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 22; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48, 48(3), 49(3), 51, 59 to 64, 142(1), 142(2) and 157

Reported in : 110(2004)DLT268; 2004(73)DRJ450; 2004(3)SLJ44(Delhi)

all subjected to any cross-examination on behalf of the petitioner. 8. In terms of Section 21 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, where any person subject to the Act who disobeys in such manner as to show a willful defiance … days RI in Force Custody BSF Act 1968 Section 21(2) Convicted by SSFC trial and and 20(c) awarded 90 days RI in Force Custody vide order dated 11.3.98.BSF Act 1968 Section 22(e) Convicted by SSFC trial and

Gurdip Singh Bath Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

had absented himself from duty without leave and therefore, had committed an offence unde Section 18 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, (hereinafter referred to as 'the BSF Act') because he was declared a deserter. For such serious allegations as … that time, the petitioner was serving as Assistant Commandant. He applied for extension of leave and was sanctioned 90 days leave upto 30.03.1993. The petitioner realised that on account of sudden and sad demise of the petitioner's

Union of India Rep. By the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Vs. Ranj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

the PC Act. Only the Army Act, 1950; the Air Force Act, 1950; the Navy Act, 1957; the Border Security Force Act, 1968; the Coast Guard Act, 1978 and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 are the statutes included in Section … complainant of the case was given to the Respondents. 2.The composition of the GARC was in violation of Section 90 of the 2006 Act inasmuch as the members of the GARC did not have the required rank to

Md. Abdul Sattar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226(2)

dismissing him from service and the proceeding of the connected Summary Security Force Court at Headquarter 192 Bn. Border Security Force, Radhabari, P.O. Bhuikidangapara, Dist.- Jalpaiguri, West Bengal.2. The facts of the case may be briefly stated as follows … 192 Bn. BSF he was suddenly served with Charge Sheet dated 9.11.2000 Under Section 26 of the BSF Act, 1968. The charge against him was framed as follows :-'INTOXICATIONIn that heat Bn. HQ. Radhabari on 07.11.2000at abort 2100 … as Cook in the year 1990 and while serving as Cook No. 90-192128 under 192 Bn. BSF he was suddenly served with Charge Sheet dated

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16(7), 45B and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Army Act; Border Security Force Act - Sections 2(1), 5, 14 to 45, 48 and 141; Navy Act; Armed Forces Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC1416; 2003(3)AWC1948(SC); (2003)3CALLT15(SC); [2003(97)FLR1034]; 2003(3)JKJ41[SC]; JT2003(3)SC201; 2003(3)SCALE8; (2003)4SCC531; [2003]2SCR721; 2003(2)SLJ395(SC);

for interfering with the impugned judgment in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.; Border Security Force Act, 1968 Sections 5, 41, 48, 49, 64, 65, 68, 72, 107 and 108 - Border Security Force Rules, 1969 … the description referred to in that provision;2(1)(h) 'Deputy Inspector-General' means a Deputy Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;2(1)(n) 'Inspector-General' means the Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;5. Control, direction etc. (1) The general … week of July 1990 accepted Rupees 6,000/- (Rupees sixthousand only) from No. 90401117 Recruit Constable Bhavesh Kumar Jha under training at Subsidiary Training center, BorderSecurity

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the … earned leave for 30 days from 14 Dec 89 to 12 Jan 90. The period of overstayal was regularized by granting leave.(b) He again overstayed

Ram Ashray Prasad Dwivedi Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner argued that the petitioner is charged for having committed an offence punishable under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. He refers to the provision of 3 Section 20(a) and argues that the said provision only pertains to … is refusing to speak and cross-examine the witness and by holding that the requirement of Rules 89 and 90 have been complied with. The second prosecution witness PW-2 HC Abhimanyu Yadav was examined. In his case also

Murari Kumar Singh vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the service with full salary.”2. The facts as noted from the writ petition are that the petitionerenrolled in Border Security Force (‘BSF’, for short) as Constable on 31.03.2008. During his service, he was awarded commendation certificate for operational achievement … day, he was informed that, he has been held guilty of charges under Section 40 of the BSF Act, 1968 for firing 01 round without any provocation and under Section 22(e) of the Act for being in the … sanctioned 30 days Earned Leave.Signing Date:10.03.2026 W.P.(C) 3872/2022 Page 15 of 32v. 90 days AWL period w.e.f. 05.09.2016 to 03.12.2016 was regularized by granting 90