Advanced Search Results

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could not be established and a fresh charge under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for committing offence in terms of Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 came to be … shall sign their statements after the same have been read over and explained to him.(6-A) The provisions of Section 89 of the Act shall apply for procuring the attendance of witnesses before the officer preparing the record of

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … witnesses on the ground that their evidence was not likely to be of material assistance at the trial. Section 89 of the Act provides for summoning the witnesses. Rule 64 of the Rules provides for summoning of the

Union of India and Another Vs. O.P. Bishnoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rules 45 and 46

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)937; 2000(54)DRJ264

matter on merits. Investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed by a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present … learned Single Judge was that the respondent was tried by General Security Force Court on a charge under Section 31(b) of the Border Security Force Act (for short the Act) namely :- without proper authority extract from

Ram Ashray Prasad Dwivedi Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner argued that the petitioner is charged for having committed an offence punishable under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. He refers to the provision of 3 Section 20(a) and argues that the said provision only pertains to … the petitioner is refusing to speak and cross-examine the witness and by holding that the requirement of Rules 89 and 90 have been complied with. The second prosecution witness PW-2 HC Abhimanyu Yadav was examined. In his

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the … I have gone through the case of absence without leave against No. 89005099 Const DWARIKA NATH MISHRA, D Coy of this unit. He was given

Baljinder Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2006(3)SLJ392(P& H)

decision of the Summary Security Force Court, the petitioner preferred a statutory petition under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 along with an application under Section 130 of the Act for suspension of the sentence imposed upon him. … not.(6) No Counsel, or legal practitioner shall be permitted to appear before a Court of inquiry.(7) Provisions of Section 89 shall apply for procuring the attendance of witnesses before the Court of inquiry.(8) Before giving an opinion against

Rajnish Kumar Ex Constable Gd vs Union of India Through Ministry of Ho ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the adjudication of the present petition are as follows:2.1. The Petitioner was working as Constable (GD) in the Border Security Force. It is alleged that on 26.07.2021, the Petitioner pointed his personal weapon towards his superior officer and used … By:DEEPANSHU W.P.(C) 11617/2023 Page 2 of 7FOURTH AN ACT PREJUDICAL TO GOOD ORDERCHARGE BSF AND DISCIPLINE OF THE FORCE ACT 1968 In that he Sec 40 On 26.07.2021, while performing PTZ Camera duty at MMG Morcha of BOP Choura … No. 5 whereby the Petitioner was found guilty of the charges under Sections 20(b), 20(c), 22(a), 40 of the BSF Act, 1968 and was sentenced … that he, Sec-20(b) On 26.07.2021 at MMG Morcha of BOP Choura Forward-II, 89 Bn BSF pointed his personal weapon towards SI Tejpal Singh, HC Surender

State of Kerala vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471 … House, by car with Registration No.KL 5 W 8998 owned by A6. A2, A3 and A5 along

Girija Menon vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471 … House, by car with Registration No.KL 5 W 8998 owned by A6. A2, A3 and A5 along

Ajeesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471 … House, by car with Registration No.KL 5 W 8998 owned by A6. A2, A3 and A5 along