Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 88 · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 12 2007

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-12-2007

Subject : Criminal

petition) was confirmed vide order dated 10.6.91 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) passed by the Inspector General of Border Security Force (for short BSF) Tripura, Cachar and Mizoram Frontier (Confirming Authority) and the communication being No. 6/57/97-Pet/CIO (D&L;)/BSF/O-14 dated … Security Force Court, not in criminal court, and the appellant/petitioner was charged under Section 46 of the BSF Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') for committing a civil offence that is to say committed an offence of rape, … it for trial of a civil offence like rape and it will be evident from the provisions of Section 88 of the BSF Act that the legislature empowered the Security Force Court to take judicial notice of any … may make rules consistent with the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Army Act, Navy and the Air Force Act and other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force. He

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2004

Pawanjit Singh Vs. Director General, Bsf and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-28-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : B.S.F. Rules, 1969 - Rule 177

Reported in : (2004)138PLR259

of the first twelve of the following questions, you will be liable to be punished provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.' 8. The petitioner totally ignored the warning. In such circumstances, it would be difficult for this Court to … Court by quoting irrelevant provisions of B.S.F. Act, 1968. In fact, the petitioner wilfully contravened the provisions of Sections 19 and 23 of the B.S.F Act, 1968. It is further stated that the respondents have rightly terminated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1988

Border Security Force (B.S.F.), Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya and o ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-30-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3

Matched in: Parties Border Security Force (B.S.F.), Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 12 2011

Janardan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Navy Act 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

in Force Custody and reduced his rank from Head Constable to Constable.16. As per Section 107 of The Border Security Force Act 1968 a finding or sentence by a Security Force Court has to be confirmed and a revision also lies … charge:-(a) It is in evidence of Shri S.S.Dubey (PW-6) and Shri Ghanshyam Dubey (PW-II) that on 07 June 88, Shri S.S.Dubey paid a sum of `4,000/- to the accused at Police Lines Varanasi. According to Ct.Raj Kumar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2007

Director General, Border Security Force and ors. Vs. Iboton Singh (Kh)

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-12-2007

Subject : Criminal

Matched in: Parties Director General, Border Security Force and ors. Vs. Iboton Singh (Kh)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Ajit Kumar Singh Through Smt. Poonam Singh Wife and Pairokar vs Union ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

was recorded in the presence and hearing of the accused/petitioner under the provisions of Rule 48 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (“Rules”).12. Mr. Pawar in his rejoinder submissions has argued that thechargesheet along with the findings and … Society, Gurdaspur (Punjab7. The newly constituted ICC conducted the enquiry as per POSH Actand the Border Security Forces Act, 1968 (“BSF Act”) and issued its findings and opinion dated 26.05.2025 wherein the petitioner was found to be blameworthy … Agro Industries DevelopmentCorpn. Ltd. & Anr. v. Jhan Khan, (2007) 10 SCC 88 to state that an existence of an alternative remedy does not bar … directing the Respondents to reconstitute the Internal Complaints Committee in terms of Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of WomenSigned By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 3064/2026 Page

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2024

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

27.04.1974 which entrusted functions of customs officer to police officers in a particular jurisdiction and officers of the Border Security Force respectively. However, in the case of DRI officers, they would clearly fall under Sections 3, 4 and 5 … Functions of the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India “, 4th Edition, 1968, pages 68-70 (Annexure R XIII). As the work of Directorates of Inspection … (k) such other class of officers of customs as may be appointed for the purposes of this Act.” Section 88 - Amendment of section 5 of the Act, 1962 “88. In section 5 of the Customs Act,-(a) after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2014

Dr. Sushil Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-27-2014

Subject : Education

Against this order, a pre-confirmation appeal was filed by the present petitioner as per Section 117(1) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. While the said appeal was still pending, the said Authority, namely, the Director General, HQ, BSF, New Delhi … power under Section 254 of the Act. Quoting from Domat's Civil Law Cushing's Edition, Vol. 1 at page 88, the Hon'ble Supreme Court noted the following quotation: “It is the duty of the judges to apply the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2003

Dr. Amar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-25-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rule, 1983 - Rule 4; Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rules 1953 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2004P& H67; (2003)135PLR348

of death of such persons their widows and in theabsence of widows their children.Two per cent(iii) Defence personnel Border Security Force Personnel, Memberof the Central Reserve Police Force, Ex-Servicemen and War Widows havingdomicile in the State of Punjab.Eight per … 29.9.1995 of 10 sites for shop-cum-flats without holding the draw of lots. Petitioner No. 4 challenged the aforesaid action of the respondents in a Civil Suit and sought permanent injunction against the Trust restraining it from holding … are so framed so as to cater to the persons of all sections of Society.4. In paragraph 25 of the writ petition, it is stated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial