Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 88 · Page 1 of about 36 results (0.029 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 12 2007

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-12-2007

Subject : Criminal

petition) was confirmed vide order dated 10.6.91 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) passed by the Inspector General of Border Security Force (for short BSF) Tripura, Cachar and Mizoram Frontier (Confirming Authority) and the communication being No. 6/57/97-Pet/CIO (D&L;)/BSF/O-14 dated … Security Force Court, not in criminal court, and the appellant/petitioner was charged under Section 46 of the BSF Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') for committing a civil offence that is to say committed an offence of rape, … it for trial of a civil offence like rape and it will be evident from the provisions of Section 88 of the BSF Act that the legislature empowered the Security Force Court to take judicial notice of any … may make rules consistent with the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Army Act, Navy and the Air Force Act and other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force. He

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2004

Pawanjit Singh Vs. Director General, Bsf and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-28-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : B.S.F. Rules, 1969 - Rule 177

Reported in : (2004)138PLR259

of the first twelve of the following questions, you will be liable to be punished provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.' 8. The petitioner totally ignored the warning. In such circumstances, it would be difficult for this Court to … Court by quoting irrelevant provisions of B.S.F. Act, 1968. In fact, the petitioner wilfully contravened the provisions of Sections 19 and 23 of the B.S.F Act, 1968. It is further stated that the respondents have rightly terminated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1988

Border Security Force (B.S.F.), Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya and o ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-30-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2 and 3

that the B.S.F. is an armed force of the Union. This is apparent from the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, Section 4(1) of which dealing with the constitution of the Force states that '(t) here shall be an armed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 12 2011

Janardan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Navy Act 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

in Force Custody and reduced his rank from Head Constable to Constable.16. As per Section 107 of The Border Security Force Act 1968 a finding or sentence by a Security Force Court has to be confirmed and a revision also lies … charge:-(a) It is in evidence of Shri S.S.Dubey (PW-6) and Shri Ghanshyam Dubey (PW-II) that on 07 June 88, Shri S.S.Dubey paid a sum of `4,000/- to the accused at Police Lines Varanasi. According to Ct.Raj Kumar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2007

Director General, Border Security Force and ors. Vs. Iboton Singh (Kh)

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-12-2007

Subject : Criminal

lodged by the Coy. Commander, Moreh Coy. The BSF authorities exercised their discretion, under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'BSF Act'), to institute a General Security Force Court (in short, 'GSFC'). A GSFC was accordingly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

Ajit Kumar Singh Through Smt. Poonam Singh Wife and Pairokar vs Union ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

was recorded in the presence and hearing of the accused/petitioner under the provisions of Rule 48 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (“Rules”).12. Mr. Pawar in his rejoinder submissions has argued that thechargesheet along with the findings and … Society, Gurdaspur (Punjab7. The newly constituted ICC conducted the enquiry as per POSH Actand the Border Security Forces Act, 1968 (“BSF Act”) and issued its findings and opinion dated 26.05.2025 wherein the petitioner was found to be blameworthy … Agro Industries DevelopmentCorpn. Ltd. & Anr. v. Jhan Khan, (2007) 10 SCC 88 to state that an existence of an alternative remedy does not bar … directing the Respondents to reconstitute the Internal Complaints Committee in terms of Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of WomenSigned By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 3064/2026 Page

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

State of Kerala vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … stones marked as MO94 series could beconnected cases 88 found. Third cover, when opened, found to contain … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Girija Menon vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … stones marked as MO94 series could beconnected cases 88 found. Third cover, when opened, found to contain … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Ajeesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … stones marked as MO94 series could beconnected cases 88 found. Third cover, when opened, found to contain … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2020

Jithesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-2020

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … stones marked as MO94 series could beconnected cases 88 found. Third cover, when opened, found to contain … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial