Advanced Search Results

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails … of England which has a bearing on the present case as well. The statement of law in para 85 of H alsbury's Laws of England, Vol. 1 (i), 4th Edition, relied upon in UOI v. B.N. Jha

EX.CT. Dharam Pal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. The petitioner was enrolled with the Border Security Force on August 17, 1990 as a Constable. In the year 2005 he was posted with the 85th Bn. … listing the following charge against the petitioner: Place and date of offenceOffenceB.O.P. 24-O Forward 85 Bn. BSF. 16.05.2005BSF Act-1968-Section 16 (c) in that he, at Naka Point No.2 of BOP 24-O Fwd on 16.05.05 at about 21:40

Nema Singh Otti vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 23.03.2012 was passed by the respondents terminating his services by passing a dismissal under Section 10 of Border Security Force Act, 1968, read with Rule 23 (A) of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969. After being acquitted, the W.P.(C) 463/2017 … On 22.03.2007, FIR No.56/2007 was registered against the petitioner and one Chamanlal under section 21, 25, 61 & 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and under Section 489 (C) of IPC, for their

Ex. Const. Kailash Chander Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner, who is a serving employee of the Border Security Force (BSF), challenges his dismissal order made on 9.9.2005, pursuant to an incident which is alleged to have occurred … be relevant to reproduce the charges leveled against the petitioner; they are extracted as below: IST CHARGE BSF ACT 1968.SEC-26 INTOXICATION in that he, at Bangoan on 05.09.05 at 1400 hrs was found in a state of … proceedings after the conclusion of evidence, akin to the statement made under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The extract of the statement is as follows: Answer by

Abhimaya Basumatary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Boarder Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 117; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Boarder Security Force Rules - Rule 151

I.A. Ansari, J. 1. Challenging not only the punishment of dismissal from serviceimposed by Summary Security Force Court (hereinafter referred to as 'the SSFC'), but also rejection of his appeal made against the penalty aforementioned, … Ghanshyam and No.91007288 Const Surjit Singh, were detailed for Naka duty near Border Pillar (i.e., BP) No. 197M under jurisdiction of BOP Kanchantar of 143 … Bn BSF, the petitioner, till his dismissal from service, was already awarded following four punishments :- (a) BSF Act, 1968, under Section 40 : on 23rd October, 1989, while the petitioner was on the strength of 72 Bn … in brief, stated as under :- (i) The Petitioner was enrolled in 85 Bn. BSF as Constable on 29th November, 1984. He was posted to

Dharmender Singh Vs. Uoi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Banking

NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners were employed as constables with the Border Security Force ‘BSF’ and in the year 2003 were attached with the 32nd Bn. which was deployed at the Indo-Bangladesh … otherwise, the offence report is required to state the facts alleged against a person subject to the BSF Act, 1969 and the offence constituted by the alleged wrong done. The offence report records the fact that between … thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 31(b) of the BSF Act, 1968.8. The record would evince that Sh.Rakesh Chauhan 2-IC commenced recording of the

Rakesh Kumar Vs. Uoi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Banking

NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners were employed as constables with the Border Security Force ‘BSF’ and in the year 2003 were attached with the 32nd Bn. which was deployed at the Indo-Bangladesh … otherwise, the offence report is required to state the facts alleged against a person subject to the BSF Act, 1969 and the offence constituted by the alleged wrong done. The offence report records the fact that between … thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 31(b) of the BSF Act, 1968.8. The record would evince that Sh.Rakesh Chauhan 2-IC commenced recording of the

Dharmender Singh Vs. Uoi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Banking

NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners were employed as constables with the Border Security Force ‘BSF’ and in the year 2003 were attached with the 32nd Bn. which was deployed at the Indo-Bangladesh … otherwise, the offence report is required to state the facts alleged against a person subject to the BSF Act, 1969 and the offence constituted by the alleged wrong done. The offence report records the fact that between … thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 31(b) of the BSF Act, 1968.8. The record would evince that Sh.Rakesh Chauhan 2-IC commenced recording of the

Rakesh Kumar Vs. Uoi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Banking

NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners were employed as constables with the Border Security Force ‘BSF’ and in the year 2003 were attached with the 32nd Bn. which was deployed at the Indo-Bangladesh … otherwise, the offence report is required to state the facts alleged against a person subject to the BSF Act, 1969 and the offence constituted by the alleged wrong done. The offence report records the fact that between … thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 31(b) of the BSF Act, 1968.8. The record would evince that Sh.Rakesh Chauhan 2-IC commenced recording of the

Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730

Matched in: Parties Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.