Advanced Search Results

Shiv Parshad Pandey Vs. C.B.i. Through Director, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3(2), 17, 52, 53, 57, 75, 77, 77(2), 80, 81 and 84; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 41, 45B, 51A, 52, 53, 53(2) to 106 and 170 to 174; Army Act, 1950

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR934; 2003CriLJ1710; JT2003(2)SC413; 2003(2)SCALE658; (2003)11SCC508; 2003(1)LC640(SC)

appellant.27. In the said view of the matter, these appeals fail and thesame are dismissed. Service Law - Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 52, 53, 75, 77 and 81 - B. S. F. Rules - 41, 45B, 51A, 53, … of the officers appointed to try the accused isread in the hearing of the accused in accordance with Section 84 ofthe Act. The provisions of Chapter VII of the BSF Act read withRules 52, 53 and 65 of

Suresh Lal Koul Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 84; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 67, 65(1), 65(4); ;Constitution of India - Articles 104, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ423

O.P. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner a Sub-Inspector in the Border Security Force was tried by a General Security Force Court for committing extortion. He was found guilty of having committed … in accordance with the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure. It is also challenged on the plea that Section 84 of the BSF Act has not been complied with, vitiate the proceedings of the General Security Force Court.5.

Director General, Border Security Force and ors. Vs. Iboton Singh (Kh)

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

lodged by the Coy. Commander, Moreh Coy. The BSF authorities exercised their discretion, under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'BSF Act'), to institute a General Security Force Court (in short, 'GSFC'). A GSFC was accordingly

Sub.inspector Gurbachan Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the BSF Act, 1968 to the confirming authority.25. Thereafter the petitioner preferred petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1969 to the Director General, BSF, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, which petition was rejected vide … was a holiday on December 06. On said day i.e. December 06 some officers from his Battalion i.e. 84 Battalion had come to Kadamtala. He sought permission from Senior Course Student Inspector Amrik Singh to go to

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer

Bhanwara Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 113, 114 and 115; CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 15(2); Board Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 160

and perused, the records. 6. Admittedly, for commission of civil offence as defined under Section 46 of 'the Border Security Force Act, 1968' (shortly the Act), the SSFC was assembled to enquire/try the petitioner on the charge framed and after recording

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the … 91 and reported back on 26 Nov 91 after unauthorized absence of 84 days. He was charged Under Section 19(a) and awarded 28 days RI

State of Kerala vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … happened to go to police station forconnected cases 84 receiving back a registration certificate in respect of … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Girija Menon vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … happened to go to police station forconnected cases 84 receiving back a registration certificate in respect of … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Ajeesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … happened to go to police station forconnected cases 84 receiving back a registration certificate in respect of … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471