Advanced Search Results

Sudesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 62

Reported in : 1997(42)DRJ623

that disciplinary action would be taken against him. Thereafter a Court of Inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 was ordered to inquire into the absence of the petitioner, but without awaiting the outcome thereof, it appears

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi in Criminal Complaint No.101 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … Petty Security Force Courts: and (c) Summary Security Force Courts. Chapter VII provides procedure for Security Force Courts. Section 82 says that at every General Security Force Court or Petty Security Force Court, the senior member shall be

Bhanwara Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 113, 114 and 115; CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 15(2); Board Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 160

and perused, the records. 6. Admittedly, for commission of civil offence as defined under Section 46 of 'the Border Security Force Act, 1968' (shortly the Act), the SSFC was assembled to enquire/try the petitioner on the charge framed and after recording

Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730

J. 1. These two appeals : one by the claimant Smt. Kamala Devi and other filed by the Border Security Force, Jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made … that when the well was purchased by the claimant-petitioner in the year 1968, it was only 50 feet deep as stated by P.W. 1 Shri … Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act ('the Act' herein). 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this reference briefly stated

State of Kerala vs K.Haridas

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … examined the bag belonging to the 3rdconnected cases 82 accused. His bag identified by PW26 is marked … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Girija Menon vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … examined the bag belonging to the 3rdconnected cases 82 accused. His bag identified by PW26 is marked … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Ajeesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … examined the bag belonging to the 3rdconnected cases 82 accused. His bag identified by PW26 is marked … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471

Jithesh vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

to 14 are identified. In the plastic cover, a pair of gloves and a towel (thorth) with violet border were also kept. MOs 15 and 16 are the towel and gloves. Cashew nut box is MO17. A … lengthy cross-examination, credibility of this witness was not shaken effectively.76. PW7 Mohankumar was an employee in the Border SecurityForce (BSF) who had taken voluntary retirement. At the time of examination, he was an agriculturist. He knew deceased … Choraria and others v. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938), Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. State of … examined the bag belonging to the 3rdconnected cases 82 accused. His bag identified by PW26 is marked … 6th accused and deceased Varma were seated on chairs, the 4th accused forcefully caught hold of deceased Varma from behind around his neck and with … that he might have facilitated escape of the other accused. All these actions on the part of theconnected cases 24 6th accused evoked suspicion in … accused persons were charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 396, 302, 201, 328, 465 and 471