Advanced Search Results
State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-2013
Criminal
Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 109, 201; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 80, 2(1)(a), 47, 141(1), 141(2); Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1983 - Rule 7, 41; Constitution of India - Article 136
judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Apr-25-1995
Criminal
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law
1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31
the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B. S. F., Bikaner (non-petitioner No. 2) and directed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.
Delhi
Jan-04-2002
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 446, 451, 475, 475(1) and 482; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 80 and 81; Border Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3 to 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 337; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 9; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125 and 126
2002IIIAD(Delhi)433; 96(2002)DLT217; 2002(62)DRJ16
by the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, dismissing application moved by the Commanding Officer under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, 'BSF Act') read with BSF Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Sep-19-2000
Criminal
2001(1)WLN135
of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Guwahati
Jun-12-2007
Criminal
petition) was confirmed vide order dated 10.6.91 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) passed by the Inspector General of Border Security Force (for short BSF) Tripura, Cachar and Mizoram Frontier (Confirming Authority) and the communication being No. 6/57/97-Pet/CIO (D&L;)/BSF/O-14 dated … Security Force Court, not in criminal court, and the appellant/petitioner was charged under Section 46 of the BSF Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') for committing a civil offence that is to say committed an offence of rape, … Security Force Court, choice of Force authority and Central Government is final in view of the provisions of Section 80 of the Act. In support of his aforesaid contention he referred to para 18 of the case of … may make rules consistent with the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Army Act, Navy and the Air Force Act and other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force. He
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and ors. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-30-2001
Service
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 3, 13, 26, 29, 35, 36, 48, 49 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Fundamental Rules - Rule 56
AIR2001SC1877; [2001(89)FLR599]; JT2001(4)SC306; 2001LabIC1406; 2001(3)SCALE150; (2001)4SCC309; [2001]2SCR927; 2001(2)SCT1085(SC); 2001(3)SLJ257(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1163
more years but less than 20 years are entitled to pension/pensioner benefits under the relevant provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BSF Act') and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as … General, BSF on 2nd April, 1996 for grant of pensionary benefits. Finally, after receipt of legal notice under Section 80 of CPC, the competent authority passed the following order No. 3563/(PF.RK)/97-Est.II/42328 on 3.5.1997:-'In partial modification of this office
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Parshad Pandey Vs. C.B.i. Through Director, New Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Mar-05-2003
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3(2), 17, 52, 53, 57, 75, 77, 77(2), 80, 81 and 84; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 41, 45B, 51A, 52, 53, 53(2) to 106 and 170 to 174; Army Act, 1950
2003(51)BLJR934; 2003CriLJ1710; JT2003(2)SC413; 2003(2)SCALE658; (2003)11SCC508; 2003(1)LC640(SC)
appellant.27. In the said view of the matter, these appeals fail and thesame are dismissed. Service Law - Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 52, 53, 75, 77 and 81 - B. S. F. Rules - 41, 45B, 51A, 53, … initiation of the trial. This argument of thelearned counsel will be dealt by us at an appropriate stage.13. Section 80 of the Act reads thus:-'80. Choice between criminal court and SecurityForce court - When a Criminal Court and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Aug-13-2003
Service
Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80
2003(3)JKJ381
dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … over the accused to the BSF authorities for his trial by the Security Force Court, in terms of Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act. Learned Sessions Judge accepted the request of the BSF authorities and vide
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. G. Majumdar
Kolkata
Aug-10-1977
Criminal
1978CriLJ80
to take note of certain facts and relevant laws touching the materials on record.6. Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act. 1968 says that when a Criminal Court and a Security Force Court have each jurisdiction in respect of an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of J and K Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-2013
Education
judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »