Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 8 · Page 1 of about 312 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 2002

Atul Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19, 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : 2002(5)SLR618

India through proper channel for acceptance of his resignation from service in terms of Section 8 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act and Rules). In response to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 1996

B.V. Ramnarayan Vs. State Bank of India, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-17-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Rule 92; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2)

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT753; (1997)ILLJ1007AP

in the Border Security Force was dismissed from service by the Commandant acting under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 on the ground that he was a deserter, without holding enquiry. Before the Supreme Court, the questions were … rent - Deposit of rent in Court - Held, A tenant has the option to take recourse to Section 8 in case of refusal or evasion by landlord to receive rent and if landlord were to not name

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2004

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-01-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 23 and 48; Indian Penal Code; Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Act

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

of the first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.'Since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under Section 23 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 … have considered the entire material available on record. We also summoned the original records of Special Trial Nos. 80 and 81 of 1998 which are pending before the Court of Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Gorakhpur and have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 19 1995

Ravi Paul and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 8, 113(3) and 116; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 4, 141(1), 141(2) and 142; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 9 and 14(2); Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment Rules, 1969; Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment (Repeal) Rules, 1973; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : JT1995(1)SC579; 1995LabIC405; 1995(1)SCALE261; (1995)3SCC300; [1995]1SCR419; 1995(2)SLJ205(SC); 1995(1)LC571(SC)

Assistant Principal Central Training College in the Central Reserve Police Force. On September 2, 1968, Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BSF Act') to provide for the Constitution and regulation of an armed force … rules as may be made in this behalf.6. By notification dated December 8, 1969, the Central Government made the Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants Recruitment) … Union for ensuring the security of the borders of India and for matters connected therewith. Sub-section (1) of Section 141 of the BSF Act empowers the Central Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2005

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2005

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10; Army Act, 1959 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(4) and 20(5); Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961 - Rule 2; Transaction of Business Rules, 1961 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR2006SC124; [2005(107)FLR840]; JT2005(12)SC515; 2005(8)SCALE397; (2005)8SCC760; 2006(1)SLJ312(SC)

peculiar circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs. Service - Competent Authority - Border Security Force Act 1968, Section 10; Border Security Force Rules 1959, Rules 20(4), 20 (5); Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules 1969 … the Prime Minister and the President in terms of Serial No.39 of the Third Schedule read with Rule 8 of the Transaction of Business Rules, 1961. (iv) The authorities have removed him from service without following the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2006

Prosenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Cour ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Army Rules; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Evidence Act - Sections 32; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226 and 227; Border Security Force Act - Sections 117(2) and 130; Border Security Force Rules; defense Service Regulations

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ856

of the Director General, BSF rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, and a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential … to be tried by the General Security Force Court on the following charge framed under Section 46 BSF Act, 1968 read with Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.The accused No. 96122002 Constable Prosenjit Kundu of 70 Battalion, … to be disproportionate and hence the writ petition deserved to be dismissed. 8. We have considered the submissions made by the parties and scrutinised the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Union of India and ors. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 3, 13, 26, 29, 35, 36, 48, 49 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Fundamental Rules - Rule 56

Reported in : AIR2001SC1877; [2001(89)FLR599]; JT2001(4)SC306; 2001LabIC1406; 2001(3)SCALE150; (2001)4SCC309; [2001]2SCR927; 2001(2)SCT1085(SC); 2001(3)SLJ257(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1163

more years but less than 20 years are entitled to pension/pensioner benefits under the relevant provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BSF Act') and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as … appreciating the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties it would be necessary to refer to Section 8 of the BSF Act and Rule 19 of the Rule which are as under:'Section 8.-Resignation and Withdrawal form

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2010

Shri Kantilal Bhanudas Dukare a/P Raogaon, Tal.Karmala, Dist.Solapur. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-16-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act 1968 - Sections 40 and 46,; Prevention Of Corruption Act 1988 - Section 7,

from India. The Petitioner was accordingly charge sheeted under the provisions of Sections 40 and 46 of the Border Security Force Act 1968. The charges levelled against the Petitioner are as under :Charge BSF Act, Sec.401stAN OMISSION PRE JUDICIAL TO GOOD … said to be a cattle smuggler from India. The Petitioner was accordingly charge sheeted under the provisions of Sections 40 and 46 of the Border Security Force Act 1968. The charges levelled against the Petitioner are as … was the superior head of the Petitioner that the Petitioner had allowed 8 cattle head to pass by accepting illegal gratification from one Allauddin who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2019

Amresh Sharma vs.director General, Border Security Force

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-19-2019

Subject : Right to Information

trial was held by the General Security Force Court (for short ‘G.S.F.C.’) established under Section 64 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act). Two separate charge sheets were framed by the G.S.F.C. The first charge sheet was issued under … herein and denied the documents at point No.(iii), (iv) and (v) on the ground that the same attracts Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005. W.P.(C) No.5951/2014 Page 1 of 10 2. Suffice it to state that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2000

Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-19-2000

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001(1)WLN135

of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance … In self defence, the outpost party fired 15 round of 9 MM, 11 round of 7.62 MM and 8 round of 303 on account of which two intruders died on the spot and some of them taking

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial