Advanced Search Results

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could not be established and a fresh charge under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for committing offence in terms of Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 came to be … THE SAID ACT.In that he,between Jan 1997 and July, 1997 was found in possession of assets worth Rs 79,495/- (Rupees Seventy Nine Thousand four hundred and ninety five only) disproportionate to his known source of income which

Ajaib Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22

Reported in : 1997(40)DRJ710

under challenge on numerous grounds, including the one that the same is contrary to the provisions of the Border Security Force Act and the Rules framed there under and the same has been passed without complying with the procedure prescribed … thereforee, dismiss him from service with effect from 9-7-94 (FN) in terms of Section 11(2) of the Bsf Act, 1968 read with Rule 177 of Bsf Rules 1969.(2)Period of absence from 19.11.1993 to 8.7.94 (AN) be treated as

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … are required to be heard judicially include applications under Section 397 and 398 as well as petitions under Section 79 of the Companies Act or other petitions for confirming or alterations of memorandum of associations.25. However, the functions

Achal Singh Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The writ petitioner had joined service as Constable (GD) with the Border Security Force on a date not disclosed in the pleadings of the parties but it appears that it was around … be drawn up. The charge was of having committed an offence punishable under Section 19(b) of the BSF Act, 1968, which makes it an offence to overstay leave granted without a sufficient cause. In the charge it was … petitioner successfully evaded apprehension.4. On October 06, 2002, after overstaying leave of 79 days, the petitioner reported at the BSF Transit Camp at Jammu and

Deepak Kumar Shukla vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India assailing order dated 02.12.2023, passed by the Commandant, 118 Battalion, Border Security Force, whereby the Petitioner was dismissed from service and consequently praying for reinstatement into service.Signing Date:16.04.2026 Page 1 of … five charges against the Petitioner were as follows:“ FIRST CHARGE : AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDERAND BSF ACT 1968 DISCIPLINE OF THE FORCE UNDER in that he, SECTION 40 in between 13.09.2022 to 13.01.2023 whiledeployed at BOP … was further established that the Petitioner made 97 outgoing calls and received 79 incoming calls on the undeclared mobile device during the relevant period, thereby

Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730

J. 1. These two appeals : one by the claimant Smt. Kamala Devi and other filed by the Border Security Force, Jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made … that when the well was purchased by the claimant-petitioner in the year 1968, it was only 50 feet deep as stated by P.W. 1 Shri … Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act ('the Act' herein). 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this reference briefly stated

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46 and 59; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rule 45

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ234

short ground, that his trial by the General Security Force Court is vitiated because of flagrant violation of Border Security Force Act and Border Security Force Rules, hereinafter referred as Act and Rules respectively.2. Mrs. Surinder Kour, learned Counsel for … reads, thus:APPENDIX VIRULE 53(2)CHARGE SHEETThe accused No. 870021695 Subedar Nawab Khan of 5 BN BSF, is charged with:BSF ACT 1968, SECTION 46 : COMMITTING A CIVILOFFENCE, THAT IS TO SAY ABETTING THESMUGGLING OF GOODS, PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 3 OFCONSERVATION … 1997 and July 1997, was found in possession of assets worth Rs. 79,495/- (Rupees seventy nine thousand four hundred and ninety five) only disproportionate to

Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and or ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1997(1)WLC518; 1996(1)WLN466

1622 and 1625 situated on Mandore Road, Jodhpur was acquired by the State Government for the purpose of Border Security Force. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, 'the Act') that the land is needed

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … of the record of the proceedings.(2) When a Court has accepted a plea of guilty made under Rule 79 the confirming authority may confirm its finding notwithstanding that the Court has accepted the plea without the concurrence

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under