Advanced Search Results

Ex.Const.Ram Kumar Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the above captioned is that on April 25, 1988 the petitioner was enrolled as a Constable in Border Security Force.2. Pertaining to an incident dated August 18, 2002 as per which the petitioner was found absent from … Record of Evidence the Commandant framed charges against the petitioner which read as under: IST CHARGE INTOXICATION BSF ACT - 1968 SECTION - 26 in that he, at 67 Bn BSF Panjipara where he was undergoing SLC Phase-II on … of the camp in a state of intoxication, the Commandant of the 78th Bn. BSF to which the petitioner was attached took cognizance of the

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Const. Jaibir Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 45; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149, 120B

u/s 20(a) i.e. using criminal force to his superior (first charge) and Section 26 intoxication (second charge) of BORDER SECURITY FORCE Act 1968. All the three accused persons pleaded not guilty of 1st charge and guilty of 2nd charge, hence competent

Pawanjit Singh Vs. Director General, Bsf and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : B.S.F. Rules, 1969 - Rule 177

Reported in : (2004)138PLR259

of the first twelve of the following questions, you will be liable to be punished provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.' 8. The petitioner totally ignored the warning. In such circumstances, it would be difficult for this Court to … Court by quoting irrelevant provisions of B.S.F. Act, 1968. In fact, the petitioner wilfully contravened the provisions of Sections 19 and 23 of the B.S.F Act, 1968. It is further stated that the respondents have rightly terminated … the case of Rajinder Kaur v. Punjab State and Anr., 1986(3) S.L.R. 78, the Supreme Court relying on all the earlier judgments mentioned above, observed

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

excludes the jurisdiction exercisable by the procedure applicable to Army Act, Navy Act, Air Force Act and the Border Security Act. By such exclusion, the court martial was competent even to make trial of the individual when the … SCC 161). Though it related to Sections 64, 70, 74, 117(1)(2) and 141 of the Border Security Forces Act 1968, the question was whether the court was to give reasons in support of its verdict. Placing reliance on … investigate the allegations. Therefore, the Commanding Officer had jurisdiction to conduct trial in accordance with Regulation 148(5). Furthermore, Section 78(1) of the Act clearly states that any person subject to naval law charged with a naval or civil

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

of 1950), the Air Force Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 11968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised … to three years or such other punishment as is hereinafter mentioned. Section 78(1) provides that every person subject to naval law to be charged with

Ravi Paul and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 8, 113(3) and 116; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 4, 141(1), 141(2) and 142; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 9 and 14(2); Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment Rules, 1969; Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment (Repeal) Rules, 1973; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : JT1995(1)SC579; 1995LabIC405; 1995(1)SCALE261; (1995)3SCC300; [1995]1SCR419; 1995(2)SLJ205(SC); 1995(1)LC571(SC)

Assistant Principal Central Training College in the Central Reserve Police Force. On September 2, 1968, Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BSF Act') to provide for the Constitution and regulation of an armed force … Union for ensuring the security of the borders of India and for matters connected therewith. Sub-section (1) of Section 141 of the BSF Act empowers the Central Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into … BSF on selection by the Special Selection Board during the period 1974- 78 is governed by Rule 8(b) of the CRPF Rules. In our opinion,

Sripurna Chandra Nahak. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act - Section 19 (b), 141, 11(2), 177, 11 Rules 177, 6; Central Civil Service (CCS) - Rule 41, 25.

for grant of minimum pension despite the fact that the petitioner has completed 16 years of service in Border Security Force (hereinafter referred to as 'the B.S.F.') and, thereafter, he has been dismissed from service on the ground of … Force for passing the impugned order of dismissal for an offence made under section 19 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 following the procedure contained in Chapters- VIII to XI of the Rules framed under section 141 of the … in the B.S.F. and was posted under the control of the Commandant, 78 Battalion B.S.F. He also underwent training and after completion of training he

Border Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2(2) and 3; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4

BSF vesting in the Central Government by virtue of what has been stated in Section 4 of the Border Security Force Act inasmuch as Commission of Enquiry is a fact finding body and by appointing such a Commission no control … The Central Government can suo motu deploy the force in any State.' 15. The BSF Act 47 of 1968 and the rules promulgated under the Act were heavily relied in support of the writ petitions therefore we

Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113

Reported in : AIR1969SC783; (1970)3SCC400; [1969]3SCR254

amendment.55. The only evidence was this area (which is otherwise uninhabited) was in parts occupied by an Indian security force. The existence of these Watch and Ward officers or the establishment of a polling booth for them at … to restoration of the status quo as at 1 January, 1965, in the area of the Gujarat-West Pakistan border, in the confidence that this will also contribute to a reduction of the present tension along the entire … 409/68). the appeals from the Delhi High Court's common judgment, 14 May, 1968 on certificate are by Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma (C.A. No. 2118/68) and … Minquiers and Ecrehos case, I. C.J. Reports page 78) may be one kind of evidence. But this … also conducted the case for India before the Tribunal.3. The Indian Independence Act of My 18, 1947, (an Act of the British Parliament) created from … was not a 'tribal area' as defined in Section 311 of the Government of India Act, 1935.Each