Advanced Search Results

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could not be established and a fresh charge under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for committing offence in terms of Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 came to be … Petitioner raised an objection regarding the framing of second charge which was disallowed by the Court under Rule 73 of the BSF Rules, 1969.11. On the basis of the scrutiny of the record and examination of the

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

petition) was confirmed vide order dated 10.6.91 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) passed by the Inspector General of Border Security Force (for short BSF) Tripura, Cachar and Mizoram Frontier (Confirming Authority) and the communication being No. 6/57/97-Pet/CIO (D&L;)/BSF/O-14 dated … Security Force Court, not in criminal court, and the appellant/petitioner was charged under Section 46 of the BSF Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') for committing a civil offence that is to say committed an offence of rape, … may make rules consistent with the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Army Act, Navy and the Air Force Act and other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force. He … Pillai, the appellant herein, was the writ petitioner in Civil Rule No. 73 of 1998 before this Court. In the said Writ Petition, the petitioner

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … be independent of the order of reinstatement. (Ref: MANU/SC/8107/2006 : AIR 2006 SC 2466 : (2006) 4 SCC 733 UPSRTC Ltd. vs. Sarada Prasad Misra & Anr.)104. It has been further held that no rigid or mechanical

Yash Paul Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 19; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rule 45

Reported in : 2004(2)JKJ401

of salary etc. The main ground of challenge in the petition is that the procedure prescribed under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the rules framed there-under has not been followed. In as much as the petitioner was not provided … allegations of non-observance of the procedure prescribed under rules, it is stated that the petitioner was charged under section 19(b) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for over-staying the leave without any sufficient cause. He was … taken ill and was able to resume the duty on 19-5-2002 in 73 Bn BSF. Respondents did not allow him to rejoin the duty and

Balwan Singh S/O Late Sh. Jagdev Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Throu ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)JKJ104

in their counter is that the petitioner without exhausting the statutory remedy provided under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act 1968 read with rule 22 of the Border Security force Rules, 1969, which provides that a person aggrieved by … was enrolled in Border Security Force as Constable with effect from 26.8.1997 and after basic training posted in 73 Battalion, B.S.F on 3.1.99. The petitioner had proceeded on five days earned leave with effect from 10.11.2000 due

Devender Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

by this Court be paid within four weeks. With these directions and observations, the writ petition is allowed. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 22-E and 40 - Difference between “misconduct reinstatement” and illegal termination - misconduct reinstatement refers to

Dr. Amar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rule, 1983 - Rule 4; Punjab Town Improvement (Utillisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rules 1953 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2004P& H67; (2003)135PLR348

of death of such persons their widows and in theabsence of widows their children.Two per cent(iii) Defence personnel Border Security Force Personnel, Memberof the Central Reserve Police Force, Ex-Servicemen and War Widows havingdomicile in the State of Punjab.Eight per … denied. The Punjab Town Improvement (Utilisation of Land and Allotment of Plots) Rules, 1983 have been framed under Section 73 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922. In Rule 4 of the Rules ibid, as reproduced in para

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … for Trade reported in the Times of 2nd February; [1978] (3) WLR 73 when it was observed that new shareholders often in practice had little … of the respondents in requiring them to serve on the other side a copy of their application under Section 399(4) seeking leave to maintain a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners

Ajit Kumar Singh Through Smt. Poonam Singh Wife and Pairokar vs Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was recorded in the presence and hearing of the accused/petitioner under the provisions of Rule 48 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (“Rules”).12. Mr. Pawar in his rejoinder submissions has argued that thechargesheet along with the findings and … Society, Gurdaspur (Punjab7. The newly constituted ICC conducted the enquiry as per POSH Actand the Border Security Forces Act, 1968 (“BSF Act”) and issued its findings and opinion dated 26.05.2025 wherein the petitioner was found to be blameworthy … Union of India & Ors. v. L.D. Balam Singh, 2002 (9) SCC 73 has been referred to argue that the respondents cannot contest that since … directing the Respondents to reconstitute the Internal Complaints Committee in terms of Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of WomenSigned By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 3064/2026 Page

Mahender Singh (Ex. Const) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 117; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 142 and 142(2)

Reported in : 2008(104)DRJ749

tenor of what is recorded is almost verbatim of what is required as per Rule 142 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Rules'). Rule 142 reads as under:142. General plea of 'Guilty' … to consider afresh the statutory petition filed by the petitioner in terms of Section 117 of the BSF Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act') and pass appropriate orders, The Director General, BSF was also directed