Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16(7), 45B and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Army Act; Border Security Force Act - Sections 2(1), 5, 14 to 45, 48 and 141; Navy Act; Armed Forces Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC1416; 2003(3)AWC1948(SC); (2003)3CALLT15(SC); [2003(97)FLR1034]; 2003(3)JKJ41[SC]; JT2003(3)SC201; 2003(3)SCALE8; (2003)4SCC531; [2003]2SCR721; 2003(2)SLJ395(SC);

for interfering with the impugned judgment in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.; Border Security Force Act, 1968 Sections 5, 41, 48, 49, 64, 65, 68, 72, 107 and 108 - Border Security Force Rules, 1969 … the description referred to in that provision;2(1)(h) 'Deputy Inspector-General' means a Deputy Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;2(1)(n) 'Inspector-General' means the Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;5. Control, direction etc. (1) The general

The Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. G. Majumdar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1978CriLJ80

to take note of certain facts and relevant laws touching the materials on record.6. Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act. 1968 says that when a Criminal Court and a Security Force Court have each jurisdiction in respect of an … Facts relevant for our purpose may be stated in short. On 16-7-1974 one Sohan Singh, a Naiyak under 72 Bn. Border Security Force, Duttafuliya Base Camp. p. S. Bagda under orders of his Commanding Officer K. B.

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rules 21, 22, 22(2) and 170 to 176; ;Service Rules; ;C.C.S. Pension Rules - Rule 48, 48A, 48A(1) and 48A(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

Counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.S.F. Act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer

Ravi Paul and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 8, 113(3) and 116; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 4, 141(1), 141(2) and 142; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 9 and 14(2); Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment Rules, 1969; Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment (Repeal) Rules, 1973; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : JT1995(1)SC579; 1995LabIC405; 1995(1)SCALE261; (1995)3SCC300; [1995]1SCR419; 1995(2)SLJ205(SC); 1995(1)LC571(SC)

Assistant Principal Central Training College in the Central Reserve Police Force. On September 2, 1968, Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BSF Act') to provide for the Constitution and regulation of an armed force … Union for ensuring the security of the borders of India and for matters connected therewith. Sub-section (1) of Section 141 of the BSF Act empowers the Central Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into

Abhimaya Basumatary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Boarder Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 117; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Boarder Security Force Rules - Rule 151

I.A. Ansari, J. 1. Challenging not only the punishment of dismissal from serviceimposed by Summary Security Force Court (hereinafter referred to as 'the SSFC'), but also rejection of his appeal made against the penalty aforementioned, … Bn BSF, the petitioner, till his dismissal from service, was already awarded following four punishments :- (a) BSF Act, 1968, under Section 40 : on 23rd October, 1989, while the petitioner was on the strength of 72 Bn … Ghanshyam and No.91007288 Const Surjit Singh, were detailed for Naka duty near Border Pillar (i.e., BP) No. 197M under jurisdiction of BOP Kanchantar of 143

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was … 2-7-1991. He was also awarded 28 days rigorous imprisonment in Force Custody for remaining absent without leave for 72 days w.e.f. 19-11-1992 to 29-1-1993. Further he was awarded 28 days rigorous imprisonment in Force Custody under Section

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … of the respondents in requiring them to serve on the other side a copy of their application under Section 399(4) seeking leave to maintain a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners … of a Single Judge of this Court in 1978 (48) Comp cas 728 Sri Krishna Tiles And Potteries(Madras) P. Ltd. v. Company Law Board and

Achal Singh Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The writ petitioner had joined service as Constable (GD) with the Border Security Force on a date not disclosed in the pleadings of the parties but it appears that it was around … be drawn up. The charge was of having committed an offence punishable under Section 19(b) of the BSF Act, 1968, which makes it an offence to overstay leave granted without a sufficient cause. In the charge it was … 06, 2003 as under:“CHARGE SHEET The accused, No.89141131 Constable Achal Singh of 72 Bn. BSF, is charged with :BSF ACT SECTION -19(b) WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE

Vinod Kumar S/O Sudarshan Kelkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 428; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46 and 121A; Border Security Force (Amendment) Act, 2000; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj561

Court for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, the B.S.F. Act) is entitled to set off for the period he has undergone detention as … be subject to limitation of Section 433A of the Code, or Constitutional power has been exercised under Articles. 72/161 of the Constitution. In Bhagirath's case : 1985CriLJ1179 the question which the Constitution Bench was required to consider