Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 71 · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.048 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 19 2001

Union of India and Another Vs. Major Singh and Chander Pal Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-19-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 19, 48 and 117(2) and 128; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71, 164(2) and 179 - Rule 22

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)376; 2001(58)DRJ282

from service' which is not enumerated and Seriallized as one of the punishments under Section 48 of the Border Security Force Act (in short 'BSF Act'). 3. The respondents in these appeals were tried by the Summary Security Force Court … and Rules are pari materia with the Act and Rules of this Act (BSF Act). She stated that Section 71 of the Army Act deals with punishments awarded by the Court Martial. Similarly Section 48 of the BSF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2004

Yash Paul Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Mar-05-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 19; ;Border Security Force Rules - Rule 45

Reported in : 2004(2)JKJ401

of salary etc. The main ground of challenge in the petition is that the procedure prescribed under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the rules framed there-under has not been followed. In as much as the petitioner was not provided … allegations of non-observance of the procedure prescribed under rules, it is stated that the petitioner was charged under section 19(b) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for over-staying the leave without any sufficient cause. He was … petitioner has been dismissed and order dated 12-9-2002 issued by the Commandant, 71 Bn whereby the petitioner was dismissed from service and is also seeking

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 1989

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … February 3, 1972. No relief was granted to him.4. The appellant as plaintiff after serving a notice under Section 80 of the CPC and as no redress was given to him, filed Title Suit No. 33 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 1985

G.P. Singh and ors. Vs. Shanti Ranjan Sarkar

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-14-1985

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1695

it was contended on behalf of the respondent, inter alia, that in view of Section 50 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred to as the Act, the order for imprisonment in civil jail for a period of three … M.M. Dutt, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the Commandant, 71 Battalion, Border Security Force, Krishnagar and others including the Union of India against the judgment and order dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1999

Nagaraju Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-15-1999

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 - Sections 15, 26, 30, 31 and 71; Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 7 and 12(2), (3)

Reported in : ILR1999KAR2903; 1999(4)KarLJ668

licences, tourist hotel licences, tourist hotel beer bar licences, military canteen licences, military canteen stores bonded warehouse licence, border security force or paramilitary force licences, refreshment room (bar) licence, auctioneer's licences. Rule 4 deals with filing of applications; Rules … provided under the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968. Therefore, the circular issued by the Commissioner dated 20-12-1995 (Annexure-H) be quashed … intoxicants can be granted in a local area. This rule is made by virtue of powers conferred under Section 71 of the Act. In pursuance of the said powers, the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1995

Ravi Paul and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rules 8, 113(3) and 116; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2, 4, 141(1), 141(2) and 142; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 9 and 14(2); Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment Rules, 1969; Border Security Force (Assistant Commandants) Recruitment (Repeal) Rules, 1973; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : JT1995(1)SC579; 1995LabIC405; 1995(1)SCALE261; (1995)3SCC300; [1995]1SCR419; 1995(2)SLJ205(SC); 1995(1)LC571(SC)

Assistant Principal Central Training College in the Central Reserve Police Force. On September 2, 1968, Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'BSF Act') to provide for the Constitution and regulation of an armed force … Union for ensuring the security of the borders of India and for matters connected therewith. Sub-section (1) of Section 141 of the BSF Act empowers the Central Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2006

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … an absolute must and failure to do so would vitiate the action. 71. There is yet another consideration where an issue is raised that there … of the respondents in requiring them to serve on the other side a copy of their application under Section 399(4) seeking leave to maintain a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1987

Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-14-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730

J. 1. These two appeals : one by the claimant Smt. Kamala Devi and other filed by the Border Security Force, Jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made … that when the well was purchased by the claimant-petitioner in the year 1968, it was only 50 feet deep as stated by P.W. 1 Shri … Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act ('the Act' herein). 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this reference briefly stated … out amounting to Rs. 5,046/- and out of the balance of Rs. 71,693/-, it has deducted the amount of Rs. 45,119/- which has been claimed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2019

r.s.kadian vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-12-2019

Subject : Education

of Rule 20 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (‗BSF Rules‘) read with Section 10 of the Border Security Force Act (‗BSF Act‘). Subsequently, during the pendency of the present writ petition, an order dated 17th June, 2009 was … BSF Act is that there are three kinds of Security Force Courts under Section 64 of the BSF Act, 1968. These are (a) General Security Force (GSFC) (b) Petty Security Force Courts (PSFC) and (c) Summary Security Force … to enquire into a case of absence from duty without due authority.‖ 71. Another administrative action is the issuance of ‗displeasure and warning‘ under Rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial