Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 68 · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16(7), 45B and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Army Act; Border Security Force Act - Sections 2(1), 5, 14 to 45, 48 and 141; Navy Act; Armed Forces Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC1416; 2003(3)AWC1948(SC); (2003)3CALLT15(SC); [2003(97)FLR1034]; 2003(3)JKJ41[SC]; JT2003(3)SC201; 2003(3)SCALE8; (2003)4SCC531; [2003]2SCR721; 2003(2)SLJ395(SC);

for interfering with the impugned judgment in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.; Border Security Force Act, 1968 Sections 5, 41, 48, 49, 64, 65, 68, 72, 107 and 108 - Border Security Force Rules, 1969 … the description referred to in that provision;2(1)(h) 'Deputy Inspector-General' means a Deputy Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;2(1)(n) 'Inspector-General' means the Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;5. Control, direction etc. (1) The general

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1995

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Iqbal Singh Cheema

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 68 and 69

Reported in : AIR1996SC426; 1995(6)SCALE137; 1995Supp(4)SCC84; [1995]Supp4SCR406; 1996(1)LC555(SC)

order passed by Gauhati High Court. In a Court Martial proceeding initiated against I. S. Cheema under the Border Security 'Force Act, 1968 and the consequential punishment of dismissal, a writ petition was moved before the Gauhati High Court by 1. … treated as a precedence 30 for other cases of corruption.7. Both the appeals are accordingly disposed of. - Section 100: [Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Second appeal - Formulation of substantial question of law Held, It is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 2013

State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 109, 201; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 80, 2(1)(a), 47, 141(1), 141(2); Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1983 - Rule 7, 41; Constitution of India - Article 136

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security ForceForce”) at the Boulevard Road, Srinagar. He allegedly fired at the instigation of R.K. Birdi, Commandant of the 68th Battalion of the Force. The cause of firing, as alleged by the prosecution, if true, is appalling. R.K.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2013

State of J and K Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2013

Subject : Education

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security ForceForce”) at the Boulevard Road, Srinagar. He allegedly fired at the instigation of R.K. Birdi, Commandant of the 68th Battalion of the Force. The cause of firing, as alleged by the prosecution, if true, is appalling. R.K.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2024

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2024

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

27.04.1974 which entrusted functions of customs officer to police officers in a particular jurisdiction and officers of the Border Security Force respectively. However, in the case of DRI officers, they would clearly fall under Sections 3, 4 and 5 … Functions of the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India “, 4th Edition, 1968, pages 68-70 (Annexure R XIII). As the work of Directorates of Inspection … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2014

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-20-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi in Criminal Complaint No.101 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2004

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2006

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … of the respondents in requiring them to serve on the other side a copy of their application under Section 399(4) seeking leave to maintain a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1987

Kamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-14-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730

J. 1. These two appeals : one by the claimant Smt. Kamala Devi and other filed by the Border Security Force, Jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made … that when the well was purchased by the claimant-petitioner in the year 1968, it was only 50 feet deep as stated by P.W. 1 Shri … Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act ('the Act' herein). 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this reference briefly stated … Rs. 13,601.25p. it makes the value of the land to be Rs. 68,006.25p. The BSF has calculated the value of the improvements made on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial