Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha
Supreme Court of India
Mar-07-2003
Service
Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16(7), 45B and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Army Act; Border Security Force Act - Sections 2(1), 5, 14 to 45, 48 and 141; Navy Act; Armed Forces Act
AIR2003SC1416; 2003(3)AWC1948(SC); (2003)3CALLT15(SC); [2003(97)FLR1034]; 2003(3)JKJ41[SC]; JT2003(3)SC201; 2003(3)SCALE8; (2003)4SCC531; [2003]2SCR721; 2003(2)SLJ395(SC);
for interfering with the impugned judgment in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.; Border Security Force Act, 1968 Sections 5, 41, 48, 49, 64, 65, 68, 72, 107 and 108 - Border Security Force Rules, 1969 … the description referred to in that provision;2(1)(h) 'Deputy Inspector-General' means a Deputy Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;2(1)(n) 'Inspector-General' means the Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;5. Control, direction etc. (1) The general
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Iqbal Singh Cheema
Supreme Court of India
Oct-16-1995
Service
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 68 and 69
AIR1996SC426; 1995(6)SCALE137; 1995Supp(4)SCC84; [1995]Supp4SCR406; 1996(1)LC555(SC)
order passed by Gauhati High Court. In a Court Martial proceeding initiated against I. S. Cheema under the Border Security 'Force Act, 1968 and the consequential punishment of dismissal, a writ petition was moved before the Gauhati High Court by 1. … treated as a precedence 30 for other cases of corruption.7. Both the appeals are accordingly disposed of. - Section 100: [Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Second appeal - Formulation of substantial question of law Held, It is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jun-03-2010
Border Security Force
Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575
consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-2013
Criminal
Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 109, 201; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 80, 2(1)(a), 47, 141(1), 141(2); Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1983 - Rule 7, 41; Constitution of India - Article 136
judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force … Force”) at the Boulevard Road, Srinagar. He allegedly fired at the instigation of R.K. Birdi, Commandant of the 68th Battalion of the Force. The cause of firing, as alleged by the prosecution, if true, is appalling. R.K.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of J and K Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-2013
Education
judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force … Force”) at the Boulevard Road, Srinagar. He allegedly fired at the instigation of R.K. Birdi, Commandant of the 68th Battalion of the Force. The cause of firing, as alleged by the prosecution, if true, is appalling. R.K.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2024
Right to Information
[2024]12S.C.R.202
27.04.1974 which entrusted functions of customs officer to police officers in a particular jurisdiction and officers of the Border Security Force respectively. However, in the case of DRI officers, they would clearly fall under Sections 3, 4 and 5 … Functions of the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India “, 4th Edition, 1968, pages 68-70 (Annexure R XIII). As the work of Directorates of Inspection … of law; whether officers of DRI are the proper officers for the purposes of s.28 of the Customs Act, 1962; whether the introduction of s.28(11) vide the Validation Act of 2011 which retrospectively validates the show cause … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi
Aug-20-2014
Land Acquisition
of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi in Criminal Complaint No.101 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Nov-05-2004
Service
Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2) and 62; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 21 and 177; ;Constitution of India - Article 311
2005(1)JKJ95
an opportunity of being heard. Again he made another representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General Border Security Force, Personnel Directorate Establishment Section, New Delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances … petitioner, at the threshold has submitted that the procedure provided under Sections 20 & 21 of the BSF Act 1968 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the Act' and 'the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUniversal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
Sep-07-2006
Intellectual Property Rights
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),
[2008]87SCL51(Delhi)
and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … of the respondents in requiring them to serve on the other side a copy of their application under Section 399(4) seeking leave to maintain a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamla Devi Vs. Border Security Force, Jodhpur and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-14-1987
Property
Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 3, 4 and 23; Rajasthan Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984
AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730
J. 1. These two appeals : one by the claimant Smt. Kamala Devi and other filed by the Border Security Force, Jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made … that when the well was purchased by the claimant-petitioner in the year 1968, it was only 50 feet deep as stated by P.W. 1 Shri … Judge, Jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act ('the Act' herein). 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this reference briefly stated … Rs. 13,601.25p. it makes the value of the land to be Rs. 68,006.25p. The BSF has calculated the value of the improvements made on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »