Advanced Search Results

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … Chapter VII are not attracted in the case of members of the Force of the officers category. Rule 61 provides composition of General and Petty Security Force Courts. Rule 62 provides duties of convening officer when he

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … alongwith arms/ammunition after allegedly consuming liquor and apprehended by Civil police on 29. 5. 1998 at 16 Hrs. Section 61 of the BSF Act 1968 which deals with apprehension of deserter reads:-'61. Capture of deserters -- (1) Whenever

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Union Of India Vs. Jogeshwar Swain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of an offence under Section 40 Civil Appeal Nos. 8629-8630 of 2014 Page 2 of 31 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, “BSF Act, 1968”), that is for committing an act prejudicial to the good order and discipline … claiming therein that the view taken by the High Court that there was infraction of Rules 60 and 61 of the BSF Rules, 1969 is erroneous because those provisions get attracted only if the trial is by

Nema Singh Otti vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

dated 23.03.2012 was passed by the respondents terminating his services by passing a dismissal under Section 10 of Border Security Force Act, 1968, read with Rule 23 (A) of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969. After being acquitted, the W.P.(C) 463/2017 … from 27.11.2009. On 22.03.2007, FIR No.56/2007 was registered against the petitioner and one Chamanlal under section 21, 25, 61 & 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and under Section 489 (C) of IPC,

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … it is conferred and the effect of the exercise of that power. 61. Placing reliance on these principles, in : 1991CriLJ664 Union of India and … of the respondents in requiring them to serve on the other side a copy of their application under Section 399(4) seeking leave to maintain a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi in Criminal Complaint No.101 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails

Sripurna Chandra Nahak. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act - Section 19 (b), 141, 11(2), 177, 11 Rules 177, 6; Central Civil Service (CCS) - Rule 41, 25.

for grant of minimum pension despite the fact that the petitioner has completed 16 years of service in Border Security Force (hereinafter referred to as 'the B.S.F.') and, thereafter, he has been dismissed from service on the ground of … Force for passing the impugned order of dismissal for an offence made under section 19 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 following the procedure contained in Chapters- VIII to XI of the Rules framed under section 141 of the … for an offence under section 19 (b) of the B.S.F. Act and 61 days unauthorized absence period was treated as EOL. Again, for 14 days

Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and or ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1997(1)WLC518; 1996(1)WLN466

Matched in: Parties Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and ors.