Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. S.S. Ranade

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2 and 141; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 3, 6, 7 and 9; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) (Amendment) Rules, 1989; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR492]; JT1995(2)SC582; 1995(3)SCALE65; (1995)4SCC462; [1995]3SCR773; (1995)3UPLBEC1499

the security of the borders of India and matters connected therewith, are governed by the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act enables the Central Government, by notification, to make rules for the … according to him, is a rank higher than that of a Commandant. Hence his age of retirement is 58 years under Rule 9. On the other hand, the appellants contend that a Commandant (Selection Grade) holds the

Sub.inspector Gurbachan Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the BSF Act, 1968 to the confirming authority.25. Thereafter the petitioner preferred petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1969 to the Director General, BSF, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, which petition was rejected vide … S.S.Chahar who prepared the Record of Evidence in case of petitioner served as prosecutor in the GSFC. VI Section 58 of the BSF Act, 1968 prescribes that no person should be detained in custody for more than 48

Atul Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19, 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : 2002(5)SLR618

India through proper channel for acceptance of his resignation from service in terms of Section 8 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with BSF Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act and Rules). In response to the

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Union of India and Another Vs. O.P. Bishnoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rules 45 and 46

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)937; 2000(54)DRJ264

matter on merits. Investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed by a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present … learned Single Judge was that the respondent was tried by General Security Force Court on a charge under Section 31(b) of the Border Security Force Act (for short the Act) namely :- without proper authority extract from … in Ex. Maj. R.S.Budhwar Vs . Union of India & Ors. : 58(1995)DLT339 had an occasion to go into the question of the nature of

Deepak Kumar Shukla vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India assailing order dated 02.12.2023, passed by the Commandant, 118 Battalion, Border Security Force, whereby the Petitioner was dismissed from service and consequently praying for reinstatement into service.Signing Date:16.04.2026 Page 1 of … five charges against the Petitioner were as follows:“ FIRST CHARGE : AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDERAND BSF ACT 1968 DISCIPLINE OF THE FORCE UNDER in that he, SECTION 40 in between 13.09.2022 to 13.01.2023 whiledeployed at BOP

Mr P S Venkatesh Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

‘the said Rules’ for short). These Rules are framed under sub Section (2) of Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. It cannot, therefore, be in doubt that the Rules are statutes. The Rule that is germane for consideration … the petitioner throughout his career of 36 years has worked in several places; he is aged 6 about 58 years; he is in the fag end of his career; he is entitled to protection under a Rule

Ajit Kumar Singh Through Smt. Poonam Singh Wife and Pairokar vs Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was recorded in the presence and hearing of the accused/petitioner under the provisions of Rule 48 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (“Rules”).12. Mr. Pawar in his rejoinder submissions has argued that thechargesheet along with the findings and … Society, Gurdaspur (Punjab7. The newly constituted ICC conducted the enquiry as per POSH Actand the Border Security Forces Act, 1968 (“BSF Act”) and issued its findings and opinion dated 26.05.2025 wherein the petitioner was found to be blameworthy … directing the Respondents to reconstitute the Internal Complaints Committee in terms of Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of WomenSigned By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 3064/2026 Page … (GD) on 29.07.2013 and upon completing his training, he was posted to 58th Battalion where he remained posted apart from his tenure as Instructor in

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … of the respondents in requiring them to serve on the other side a copy of their application under Section 399(4) seeking leave to maintain a petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The petitioners