Advanced Search Results

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … that Sub-section.further provide for not only awarding alternative punishments but also awarding combination of punishments as indicated in Section 50 of the Act. As noticed earlier, several punishments inflicted by the Security Force Courts are akin to punishments

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … the national borders has now been converted to a 'Border Smugglers Force' to the extent of the least 50% and the whole organisation has become unfit for war because now the officers lot of the Force are

P.B.Bansal Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act 1968 - Sections 108, 11(1)

the trial was sent to the Inspector General BSF for confirmation as contemplated by Section 108 of the Border Security Force Act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "The Act"). Vide order dated 28.04.1995, exercising powers under Section 113 of the Act, … could not reveal the name of the source/informant as it would be against public interest and professional ethics.15. L/Nk.Ramsubhag Tripathi PW-4, deposed that he had asked Ct.Chabbi Ram to discuss the matter of his transfer to the

State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 109, 201; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 80, 2(1)(a), 47, 141(1), 141(2); Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1983 - Rule 7, 41; Constitution of India - Article 136

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force

Kali Das Vs. Union of India

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilConstitution

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN577

pressed before us.18. In the result, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Enquiry--Desired officers not willing and available due to exigencies of service--Officer appointed and Private Counsel permitted to … Court of enquiry was ordered and witnesses were examined by the court of enquiry and a charge-sheet Under Section 30(b) for misappropriating fund of Rs. 42,602.84 was issued on 17.10.86 vide Ex. 6 but the petitioner was … of his choice to defend him as prayed by him and Mr. L.N. Mehta was allowed to represent him at the court martial trial, the

B.V. Ramnarayan Vs. State Bank of India, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Rule 92; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2)

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT753; (1997)ILLJ1007AP

in the Border Security Force was dismissed from service by the Commandant acting under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 on the ground that he was a deserter, without holding enquiry. Before the Supreme Court, the questions were … learned counsel would point out that the impugned action was taken in utter violation of Rules 49 and 50 and in violation of principles of natural justice. The learned Counsel would also submit that there was absolutely

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Devi Lal Sahu

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

leave. The writ-petitioner submitted that on 28.10.2003, he was served with a charge-sheet under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 ('the BSF Act') and was placed under close arrest at Headquarter 20 Bn. Barmer on 29.10.2003; and that … appeal, passed the order on the prayer for interim relief to the effect that the appellant shall pay 50% of the last drawn salary including emoluments to the respondent w.e.f. 01.04.2009 and, upon compliance of this condition,

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails … that he was demanding return thereof. The record shows that the sweeper Des Raj has subsequently returned Rs. 5000/- through a bank draft vide BN HQ letter No. Estt/130Bn/BK/99/875/dated 5th August 1999. The petitioner has also placed

Dipak Kumar Chakraborty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 35, 40, 41, 48, 50, 51 and 117; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45 and 51; Railway Protection Force Rules

B.K. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner who is a retired Commandant of Border Security Force (B.S.F.) has assailed the legality and validity of the order of penalty passed against him and subsequent denial … Commandant was taken up for proceeding under General Security Force Court (G.S.F.C.) on the following charges:'1st Charge, BSF Act, 1968 Section 40:An act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force:In that he, at SHQ N & M … (h) and (i) of Section 48 may be referred to which prescribe forfeiture of seniority and severe reprimand. Section 50 speaks of combination of punishments. Thus from the above provisions of the BSF Act, it cannot be said

G.P. Singh and ors. Vs. Shanti Ranjan Sarkar

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1695

it was contended on behalf of the respondent, inter alia, that in view of Section 50 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred to as the Act, the order for imprisonment in civil jail for a period of three