Advanced Search Results

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … of the Force by the SSFC and has drawn specific attention to Clause (k) of Sub-section (1) of Section 48 of the Act and submits that when the appellate authority had not inflicted this punishment on the petitioner,

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 23 and 48; Indian Penal Code; Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Act

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

of the first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.'Since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under Section 23 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 … the questionnaire (Part A), the authorities have charged the petitioner and punished him under Section 23 read with Section 48(c) of the B.S.F. Act, 1968, there is absolutely no occasion for us to interfere against the impugned judgment

Sukhwant Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 98; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 48

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)77; 1996CriLJ4079; 1996(38)DRJ299

about the said design to his superior officer. Proceedings before General Security Force Court were held under the Border Security Force Act,1968. After affording full opportunity to the petitioner, the proceeding of conviction was submitted. Authority sentenced the petitioner to … as appellate authority--Petition partly allowed.; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 48--Recording of Evidence (ROE) by Commandant-Implicated-Chargesheeted--Conviction order issued--Commandant earlier Presided over and conducted … Usha Mehra, J. (1) This petitioner was charged with three offences punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter called the 'Act of 1988'). The first charge against

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … an independent power conferred upon the Commandant apart from the power conferred upon the Security Force Court under Section 48 of the said Act for imposition of punishment of dismissal from service in respect of the offences specified

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … passed by the respondents. After the charge-sheet, the BSF authorities ordered recording of evidence in accordance with Rule 48 of Border Security Force Rules. During the recording of evidence (ROE) father of victim of rape, namely, Lal

Major Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 48

Reported in : 1999(48)DRJ601

Matched in: Citation 1999(48)DRJ601

P.R. Sumiyon Vijayraj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force (Tenure and Posting and Deputation) Rules, 2002 - Rules 4, 14, 18 and 19; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 48 and 53; Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964 - Rule 19; Border Security Force (Tenure of Posting and Deputation) (Amendment) Rules, 2002 - Rule 19

one ground stating that there was a clear violation of provision of law particularly Rule 14 of the Border Security Force (Tenure and Posting and Deputation) Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules',)3. Mr. Choudhury, learned senior counsel in … a incident of service and impugned transfer did not attract any punitive action as contemplated under the Boarder Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, the Act), this transfer cannot be said to be punitive one. The petitioner has only been … actions have been categorically and explicitly laid down in the Act itself. Sections 48 and 53 prescribe for major and minor punishment respectively and on

Chanderpal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 48 and 117(2)

Reported in : 1999(48)DRJ566

Matched in: Citation 1999(48)DRJ566

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails … punishment which could be awarded by the Summary Security Force Court is concerned, the same is prescribed under Section 48 of the BSF Act. The same ranges from a sentence of death under Sub-section (a), to imprisonment for

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … of the witnesses, the statement of the appellant was recorded under Rule 48.3 of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969. The appellant clearly stated that … 27.10.2000Brought a local womanto NakaMachan, while performingambushDuty in the area of BOPLachugachhOn International BorderwithBangladesh.BSF ACT BSF ACT 1968 SECTION-26SECTION -26 INTOXICATIONCHARGE-IIIn that he,At about 22.30 hrs.on 27.10.2000,While an ambush dutyin area ofBOP Lachugachh foundin a stateof intoxication2.