Advanced Search Results

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 446, 451, 475, 475(1) and 482; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 80 and 81; Border Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3 to 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 337; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 9; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125 and 126

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)433; 96(2002)DLT217; 2002(62)DRJ16

Matched in: Parties Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.

Union of India and Another Vs. O.P. Bishnoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Constitution of India - Article 226; Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rules 45 and 46

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)937; 2000(54)DRJ264

matter on merits. Investigation into an offence alleged to have been committed by a person subject to the Border Security Force Act 1968 (for short 'the Act') is dealt with under chapters V to VII of the Rules. For the present … learned Single Judge was that the respondent was tried by General Security Force Court on a charge under Section 31(b) of the Border Security Force Act (for short the Act) namely :- without proper authority extract from … Security Force Rules, 1969 (for short 'the Rules') was debarred under Rule 46 from being a witness which, in turn, vitiated the trial. Further grounds

Head Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 107 and 108; Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rule 48; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 304A; Evidence Act - Sections 24

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2585

months from the receipt of the Court order. The respondents defended the vires of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 and contended that the same were in accordance with the provisions … the charge-sheet dated 14th May, 1992. The charge-sheet was served on the petitioner for committing civil offence under Section 46 of the BSF Act, i.e. the offence of murder, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Vinod Kumar S/O Sudarshan Kelkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 428; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46 and 121A; Border Security Force (Amendment) Act, 2000; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj561

Court for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, the B.S.F. Act) is entitled to set off for the period he has undergone detention as

Prosenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Cour ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Army Rules; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Evidence Act - Sections 32; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226 and 227; Border Security Force Act - Sections 117(2) and 130; Border Security Force Rules; defense Service Regulations

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ856

Matched in: Parties Prosenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Court and ors.

Surender Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN209

intent to kill.' The act of the appellant was termed as an offence under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and also a civil offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. The Deputy Inspector General (Headquarters) after reaching at

Lavito Sema Vs. Union of India

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

order dated 6.7.09 (Annexure-XXXI), by which the Govt. of India in the Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General, Border Security Force has rejected the petition submitted by the petitioner against the aforesaid orders. The orders so passed is pursuant … filed by the petitioner against the order of confirmation under the provisions of Section 117(2) of the BSF Act, 1968. (2.) The petitioner while was serving as Head Constable in BSF, he was tried by a GSFC in … as Head Constable in BSF, he was tried by a GSFC in April, 2007 on a charge under Section 46 of the BSF Act for committing a civil offence i.e. murder, punishable under Section 302 IPC. According to

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … Court on charge under Section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act. As no prima facie case under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act read with Section 376 RPC was established in the record of evidence

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 40, 45(B), 46, 48, 89, 107, 108 and 117; ;Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1987 - Section 13(1) and 13(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45B, 48, 51, 51A, 59, 73 and 167; ;Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Section 13; ;Army Act - Sections 52 and 63; ;Evidence Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Army Rules - Rules 22 and 149; ;Defence Service Regulations; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could not be established and a fresh charge under Section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 for committing offence in terms of Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 came to be

Randhir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21 and 226;; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 16, 17, 40, 46,47, 74, 74(1)(2), 115, 116, 117 and 167(2);; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 51(2), 142(2), 143, 143(2), 145, 147, 148, 149, 157 and 159

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT107(HC)

Admittedly the charges against the petitioner came within the purview of section 16(d) and section 46 of the Border Security Force Act which read thus :--'16. Offences punishable more severely on active duty than at other times--any person subject to … Randhir Singh of this unit has been charged with an Offences under section 16(d) and 40 of BSF Act 1968 committed on 10.3.92 at BOP Bornberia at about 21.30 hrs. left the said picauet without orders from his