Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: border security force act 1968 section 41 · Page 1 of about 65 results (0.019 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 05 2003

Shiv Parshad Pandey Vs. C.B.i. Through Director, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 3(2), 17, 52, 53, 57, 75, 77, 77(2), 80, 81 and 84; Border Security Force Rules - Rules 41, 45B, 51A, 52, 53, 53(2) to 106 and 170 to 174; Army Act, 1950

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR934; 2003CriLJ1710; JT2003(2)SC413; 2003(2)SCALE658; (2003)11SCC508; 2003(1)LC640(SC)

appellant.27. In the said view of the matter, these appeals fail and thesame are dismissed. Service Law - Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 52, 53, 75, 77 and 81 - B. S. F. Rules - 41, 45B, 51A, 53, … order dated 8.7.1998 made by thelearned Special Judge, C.B.I., Patiala by which charges wereframed against the appellant under Sections 7 and 13(2) read withSection 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Theappellant sought for quashing of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2012

Ex. Constable Narender Bahadur Singh Vs. Uoi and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-14-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Summary Security Force Court by the Comdt. 25 Bn BSF on a charge under Section 41(e) of Border Security Force Act, 1968 for accepting Rs.20,000/- from one Nanak Chand for procuring enrollment of two persons namely Satbir Singh and Shiv

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2013

State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2013

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 109, 201; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 80, 2(1)(a), 47, 141(1), 141(2); Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1983 - Rule 7, 41; Constitution of India - Article 136

judicial custody. He went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the Security Force … court. Thus, for exercise of discretion under Section 80 of the Act, Rules have been framed and Rule 41 of the Rules, which is relevant for the purpose, reads as follows:“41. Trial of cases either by Security

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 1995

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-25-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B. S. F., Bikaner (non-petitioner No. 2) and directed … Another limb of his argument is that the offences levelled against the petitioner arc not covered under Rule 41 of the Border Security Force Rules. 1969 (in short, 'the Rules, 1969'), but those fall within Rule 42

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2005

Dipak Kumar Chakraborty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-10-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 35, 40, 41, 48, 50, 51 and 117; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 45 and 51; Railway Protection Force Rules

B.K. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner who is a retired Commandant of Border Security Force (B.S.F.) has assailed the legality and validity of the order of penalty passed against him and subsequent denial … Commandant was taken up for proceeding under General Security Force Court (G.S.F.C.) on the following charges:'1st Charge, BSF Act, 1968 Section 40:An act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force:In that he, at SHQ N & M … passed in the written test declared fail.2nd Charge, BSF Act, 1968 Section 41(e)Accepting a gratification for himself for procuring enrolment of a person in service:In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2008

Ex-constable Ramvir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-2008

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 22, 63 and 117; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 41; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 157; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(16)SCALE253; (2009)3SCC97:2009AIRSCW163:2009(1)LHSC93

before a Summary Security Force Court on the aforementioned two charges in terms of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, 'the Act') and the rules framed thereunder.4. He pleaded guilty to both the charges. He was … stage.14. The question as to whether refusal to take food by itself would come within the purview of Section 41 of the Army Act, 1950, this Court in Ranjit Thakur (supra) held:The submission that a disregard of an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. B.N. Jha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16(7), 45B and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Army Act; Border Security Force Act - Sections 2(1), 5, 14 to 45, 48 and 141; Navy Act; Armed Forces Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC1416; 2003(3)AWC1948(SC); (2003)3CALLT15(SC); [2003(97)FLR1034]; 2003(3)JKJ41[SC]; JT2003(3)SC201; 2003(3)SCALE8; (2003)4SCC531; [2003]2SCR721; 2003(2)SLJ395(SC);

for interfering with the impugned judgment in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.; Border Security Force Act, 1968 Sections 5, 41, 48, 49, 64, 65, 68, 72, 107 and 108 - Border Security Force Rules, 1969 … the description referred to in that provision;2(1)(h) 'Deputy Inspector-General' means a Deputy Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;2(1)(n) 'Inspector-General' means the Inspector-General of the Force appointed under Section 5;5. Control, direction etc. (1) The general

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2010

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2011

Janardan Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Navy Act 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

in Force Custody and reduced his rank from Head Constable to Constable.16. As per Section 107 of The Border Security Force Act 1968 a finding or sentence by a Security Force Court has to be confirmed and a revision also lies … the petitioner which is sought to be projected as conduct of a guilty mind and hence incriminating.4. Section 41(e) of the BSF Act 1968 reads as under:- "41. Any person subject to this Act who commits any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2014

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-20-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi in Criminal Complaint No.101 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 („PC Act‟) and … BSF. Chapter III of the BSF Act deals with such offences. Section 41(e) describes one such offence when a member of the BSF "directly or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial