Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Dinesh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 14, 17, 46, 64, 70, 70(1), 70(2), 70(3), 70(4), 70(5), 74, 117, 117(2) and 141; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 165; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 99, 99(1) and 133 to 161; Army Rules - Rule 66(1)

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE396

the High Court directed remand in all the matters to the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) for rewriting the order, giving reasons in support of the … Court shall not try without such reference any offence punishable under any of the Sections 14, 17 and 46 of this Act, or any offence against the officer holding the Court. Sub-section (3) provides that the SSFC

Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001(1)WLN135

of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance … Mahendra Singh. They also alleged to have stated that they would kill them. This was overheard by P.W. 4 Ses Karan, who was returning after purchasing 'Bidi' from the shop. He also alleged to have overheard that

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … passed by the respondents. After the charge-sheet, the BSF authorities ordered recording of evidence in accordance with Rule 48 of Border Security Force Rules. During the recording of evidence (ROE) father of victim of rape, namely, Lal

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10; Army Act, 1959 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(4) and 20(5); Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961 - Rule 2; Transaction of Business Rules, 1961 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR2006SC124; [2005(107)FLR840]; JT2005(12)SC515; 2005(8)SCALE397; (2005)8SCC760; 2006(1)SLJ312(SC)

peculiar circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs. Service - Competent Authority - Border Security Force Act 1968, Section 10; Border Security Force Rules 1959, Rules 20(4), 20 (5); Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules 1969

Border Security Force (B.S.F.) Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2(2) and 3; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 4

BSF vesting in the Central Government by virtue of what has been stated in Section 4 of the Border Security Force Act inasmuch as Commission of Enquiry is a fact finding body and by appointing such a Commission no control … The Central Government can suo motu deploy the force in any State.' 15. The BSF Act 47 of 1968 and the rules promulgated under the Act were heavily relied in support of the writ petitions therefore we

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 19 and 62; ;Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rules 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(6), 21, 22, 22(2), 28A, 48, 49, 167, 168, 170 to 176 and 177; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1968 - Rules 20, 21, 22(2) and 177

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

Dias non. This order has been challenged on the ground that no inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 read with rules 170 to 176 of the Border Security Rules, 1969 was held against him. He was … extension of leave, but the same have not been taken into consideration. It is further stated that Rules 48 and 49 of the BSF Rules while recording the evidence, have also not been complied with. A petition

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4D, 10A to 10D, 79, 111(4), 237, 397, 398, 399, 399(1), 399(2), 399(3), 399(4), 399(5), 401, 402 and 642; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 86, 92, 92(1) and 92(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 197; Companies (IInd Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 44; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 14; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 17(4); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 4(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(4),

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

and legislative intent, the Apex Court held that the authority which disposed of a post-confirmation petition under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and rules framed there under is not a court and every order passed administratively cannot be subjected to … complaint there under provided they satisfy the conditions laid down in Sub-section 1, 2 and 3 there under. Sub-section 4 of Section 399 enables any member or members to apply to the Company Law Board under Section 397

Gouranga Chakraborty Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2), (4), 19, 48, 59 and 141; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 6 and 177; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : AIR1989SC1321; JT1989(Suppl1)SC86; 1989(1)SCALE793; (1989)3SCC314; [1989]2SCR271; 1989(2)LC252(SC)

dismissed from service by the Commandant by order dated January 5, 1972 in accordance with the provisions of Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder.6. The Munsiff held that the plaintiff was given reasonable opportunity before the Commandant … Parliament and the same has been enforced by Notification No. S. O. 732 dated the 20th February, 1969.11. Section 4 of Border Security Force Act to be referred to hereinafter in short as BSF Act provides that :

P.R. Sumiyon Vijayraj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force (Tenure and Posting and Deputation) Rules, 2002 - Rules 4, 14, 18 and 19; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 48 and 53; Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964 - Rule 19; Border Security Force (Tenure of Posting and Deputation) (Amendment) Rules, 2002 - Rule 19

one ground stating that there was a clear violation of provision of law particularly Rule 14 of the Border Security Force (Tenure and Posting and Deputation) Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules',)3. Mr. Choudhury, learned senior counsel in … a incident of service and impugned transfer did not attract any punitive action as contemplated under the Boarder Security Force Act, 1968 (for short, the Act), this transfer cannot be said to be punitive one. The petitioner has only been … three years tenure on the place of posting as prescribed under rule 4 of Rules. As such the impugned order is purely contrary to rule … actions have been categorically and explicitly laid down in the Act itself. Sections 48 and 53 prescribe for major and minor punishment respectively and on

P.B.Bansal Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act 1968 - Sections 108, 11(1)

the trial was sent to the Inspector General BSF for confirmation as contemplated by Section 108 of the Border Security Force Act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "The Act"). Vide order dated 28.04.1995, exercising powers under Section 113 of the Act, … up a Charge Sheet dated 2.11.1992 alleging the following charges:-"FIRST CHARGE BSF ACCEPTED FOR HIMSELF BSF ACT SEC 41(e) GRATIFICATION AS A REWARD FOR PROCURING THE TRANSFER OF A PERSON IN THE SERVICE in that he, at