Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. S.S. Ranade

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2 and 141; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 3, 6, 7 and 9; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) (Amendment) Rules, 1989; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR492]; JT1995(2)SC582; 1995(3)SCALE65; (1995)4SCC462; [1995]3SCR773; (1995)3UPLBEC1499

the security of the borders of India and matters connected therewith, are governed by the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act enables the Central Government, by notification, to make rules for the … 5100-6150) 46 5. Additional Deputy Inspector General/ Additional Deputy Director (Rs. 4500-5700 + Special pay of Rs. 200) 38 6. Commandant/Assistant Director : Selection Grade - 185 (Rs. 4500-5700) 223 Ordinary Grade - 38 (Rs. 4100-5300) 7.

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … Kumar v. The Chief of Army Staff, New Delhi, AIR 1986 SC 1060, wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court held:-'Sections 38 and 39 and Sections 104 and 105 make a clear distinction between 'desertion' and 'absence without leave', and

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under

Ex. Const. Badan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : BSF Rules - Rule 25; BSF Act, 1968; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rules 38, 38(1), 49 and 54(2); Fundamental Rules - Rule 9(21); defense Services Regulations - Rule 48

Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)553; 97(2002)DLT986; 2002(64)DRJ849

thereforee, loses all relevance.2. The facts in this unfortunate case are that the petitioner was enrolled in the Border Security Force on 12.6.1990. In March 1997 it was discovered by the Respondents that the petitioner was suffering form HIV … SHQ BSF Gujarat letter No. Med/SHQ/BSF/Guj/98/1228 dated 20 Nov'98.3. Now thereforee, in exercise of the powers under BSF Act 1968, Rule-25 No. 90254763 Constable Badan Singh of 163 Bn BSF is hereby ordered to retire form service with … of the Pension Rules.6. The relevant provision can be found in Rule 38 of the Pension Rules which is reproduced for ready reference:'38. Invalid pension(1) … element and a disability element in accordance with the regulations in this section;'In respect of accidents the following rules will be observed:-(a) .....(b) .....(c) A

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails

Sri Dattusingh Rathod Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the fact that the order of penalty of dismissal from service was appealable under Section 117 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the

Deepak Kumar Shukla vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India assailing order dated 02.12.2023, passed by the Commandant, 118 Battalion, Border Security Force, whereby the Petitioner was dismissed from service and consequently praying for reinstatement into service.Signing Date:16.04.2026 Page 1 of … five charges against the Petitioner were as follows:“ FIRST CHARGE : AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDERAND BSF ACT 1968 DISCIPLINE OF THE FORCE UNDER in that he, SECTION 40 in between 13.09.2022 to 13.01.2023 whiledeployed at BOP

Sub.inspector Gurbachan Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the BSF Act, 1968 to the confirming authority.25. Thereafter the petitioner preferred petition under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1969 to the Director General, BSF, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, which petition was rejected vide … AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 02, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: January 23, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3838/1999 SUB.INSPECTOR GURBACHAN SINGH .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.J.S.Manhas, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ruchir Mishra,

Ex.Const.Jandel Singh. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force (BSF) Act - Section (1) ; Border Security Force (BSF) Ruls - Rules 37(2), 38 ;

not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The petitioner, enrolled with the Border Security Force as a constable was sent to its Academy at Tekanpur in the year 1980 and after completing his … Custody on 30.01.1995 for his Summary Security Force Court trial under Rule 38 of the BSF Rules 1969.3. As per the record, on 17.01.1995 proceedings … by the Commandant wherein 3 charges were levied upon the petitioner as under:-"CHARGE SHEET CHARGE NO.I INTOXICATION BSF ACT-1968 SEC-26 In that he, at Bn.HQ Pokaran on 15.01.95 at about 2300 hrs was found in a state … Superior officer has been defined under Clause w of Sub-Section 1 of Section 2 of the BSF Act to mean such person who is in