Advanced Search Results

Ritesh Soni vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

is to an order dated 6th August, 2018 passed by the Deputy Inspector General („DIG‟), SHQ of the Border Security Force („BSF‟), Siliguri directing the Commandant 155th BN BSF to conduct a de novo trial on the charge sheet … BSF Act and Rules, 1969. On 23rd June, 2017 a charge sheet under Section 34 (a) of BSF Act, 1968 was issued to the... Petitioner. The charge against him was that of making a false accusation against a

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … petitioner into service w.e.f. 8th September, 1996 and adjusted him against an existing vacancy of constable in the 34th Battalion BSF. The period of the petitioner's absence w.e.f. 1st June, 1996 to 7th September, 1996 was regularised

Ram Ashray Prasad Dwivedi Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner argued that the petitioner is charged for having committed an offence punishable under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. He refers to the provision of 3 Section 20(a) and argues that the said provision only pertains to … is involved. Thereafter, she invites my attention to the proceedings in the Summary Security Force Court from page 34 onwards of the return and argues that the entire trial was held in accordance to the requirement of

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … on a jacket containing 28 compartments and in 19 of them he was carrying gold slabs weighing approximately 34 kilos. It was also found that the respondent was a passenger bound for Manila. There was a general

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 23 and 48; Indian Penal Code; Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Act

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

of the first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the Border Security Force Act, 1968.'Since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under Section 23 of the B.S.F. Act, 1968 … the case of Delhi Administration through its Chief Secretary and Ors. v. Sushil Kumar, JT 1996 (10) SC 34, appears to have rightly found the non-desirability of petitioner's retention in the service. In the aforesaid case of

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … of the Force, but also for bringing disrepute to the Force which is an offence in terms of Section 40 of the Act3. Such action had been taken as a follow up on the complaint lodged by

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 26, 48, 70 and 117(2); ;Army Act; ;Army Rules - Rules 115, 115(2), 115(2A) and 125; ;Navy Act; ;Armed Forces Act; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 33(2), 43, 45, 45B, 46, 48(3), 49, 51, 62, 81, 81(3), 101, 101(3), 142, 142(2) and 157; ;Border Security Force Rules, 1965 - Rules 48(3), 49(2) and 49(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 14

(hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails

Deepak Kumar Shukla vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India assailing order dated 02.12.2023, passed by the Commandant, 118 Battalion, Border Security Force, whereby the Petitioner was dismissed from service and consequently praying for reinstatement into service.Signing Date:16.04.2026 Page 1 of … five charges against the Petitioner were as follows:“ FIRST CHARGE : AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDERAND BSF ACT 1968 DISCIPLINE OF THE FORCE UNDER in that he, SECTION 40 in between 13.09.2022 to 13.01.2023 whiledeployed at BOP … 28.10.2022 from S. Kayal, Rs. 1,200/- on 10.12.2022 from Md. Mustaq, Rs. 34,000/- on 21.12.2022 and 23.12.2022 from Krishnendu Sarkar, and Rs. 10,000/- in September/December

Const. Jaibir Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 45; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149, 120B

u/s 20(a) i.e. using criminal force to his superior (first charge) and Section 26 intoxication (second charge) of BORDER SECURITY FORCE Act 1968. All the three accused persons pleaded not guilty of 1st charge and guilty of 2nd charge, hence competent … based as if the trial was for offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code requiring ingredients of either Section 34 or Section 149 or Section 120B IPC to be narrated in the charge.16. A perusal of the charge

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area Kanzalawan,