Advanced Search Results

P.C. Pande Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN435

working as Accountant-cum-Cashier in that year The petitioner was prosecuted for misappropriating property under Section 30 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968)(hereinafter referred to as the Act'), during the year 1975-76. He was convicted by the General

Sudesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 62

Reported in : 1997(42)DRJ623

that disciplinary action would be taken against him. Thereafter a Court of Inquiry under Section 62 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 was ordered to inquire into the absence of the petitioner, but without awaiting the outcome thereof, it appears … challenge in this petition. (2) The petitioner while posted as a Constable in Border Security Force proceeded on 30 days Earned Leave w.e.f. 9th May, 1992. After availing of leave he did not report for duty though

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. S.S. Ranade

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 2 and 141; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 3, 6, 7 and 9; Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) (Amendment) Rules, 1989; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 14A

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR492]; JT1995(2)SC582; 1995(3)SCALE65; (1995)4SCC462; [1995]3SCR773; (1995)3UPLBEC1499

the security of the borders of India and matters connected therewith, are governed by the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act enables the Central Government, by notification, to make rules for the … Security Force practically together, upsetting normal recruitment plans of a duly organised service which would normally recruit about 30/40 Officers per year. This sudden recruitment of a large number of officers of the same seniority had caused

In Re: an Appln. for Stay (Can 6546/05)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 26, 40, 87, 117, 117(1) and 117(2); ;Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 48.3, 156 and 167 to 169; ;Evidence Act, 1872; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 162, 164 and 164(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

referred to as SSFC) at 10-30 a.m. on 12th November, 2001 under Sections 40 and 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. The appellant was given liberty to be present along with any person of the Battalion as friend, as … 27.10.2000Brought a local womanto NakaMachan, while performingambushDuty in the area of BOPLachugachhOn International BorderwithBangladesh.BSF ACT BSF ACT 1968 SECTION-26SECTION -26 INTOXICATIONCHARGE-IIIn that he,At about 22.30 hrs.on 27.10.2000,While an ambush dutyin area ofBOP Lachugachh foundin a stateof intoxication2.

Kali Das Vs. Union of India

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilConstitution

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN577

pressed before us.18. In the result, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Enquiry--Desired officers not willing and available due to exigencies of service--Officer appointed and Private Counsel permitted to … Court of enquiry was ordered and witnesses were examined by the court of enquiry and a charge-sheet Under Section 30(b) for misappropriating fund of Rs. 42,602.84 was issued on 17.10.86 vide Ex. 6 but the petitioner was charge-sheeted

K.S. Vohra Vs. Director General of Border Security Force

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 30

Matched in: Parties K.S. Vohra Vs. Director General of Border Security Force

Ram Vir Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 26

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)63; 1997(40)DRJ721

of the petitioner, who was stated to have been charged for an offence under section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (for short the 'Act'), which was required to be done, in accordance with Rule 48 of the Border … Gupta, J. (1) Petitioner has, in this writ petition, prayed for quashing of the order, annexure P-7 dated 30.3.1993, of his removal from service. (2) The facts in brief are that the petitioner joined Border Security Force

Gurdip Singh Bath Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

had absented himself from duty without leave and therefore, had committed an offence unde Section 18 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, (hereinafter referred to as 'the BSF Act') because he was declared a deserter. For such serious allegations as … serving in SB-II Btn. BSF, his young son aged about 311/2 years died in a road accident on 30.12.1992. The petitioner applied for leave and was granted 15 days earned leave with effect from 01.01.1993 to 15.01.1993.

Comdt. Atul Kumar Singh Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Section 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227

the finding and sentence of the Security Force Court in terms of the provisions of Section 107 of Border Security Force Act, 1968. 20. Aggrieved by the finding and sentence awarded by the Security Force Court which stood confirmed by the … laid against the petitioner as under:- "First Charge DISHONESTLY MISAPPROPRIATING BSF Act PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE GOVT Sec 30(b) In that he, at Bn HQ Paniasagar between Dec 2004 to Mar 2005, being Comdt of 18 Bn

S. S. Rana vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

October, 1990.13. On 31st January, 1994, the... Petitioner was issued a charge-sheet under Section 30 (b) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) alleging that while performing the duties of Quarter Master on 27th October, 1990, he conspired with