Advanced Search Results

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Rules - Rule 142 and 142(2); ;Border Security Force Act - Sections 18(1) and 80

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

dismissed from service vide the impugned order dated 18.11.1999. This punishment was imposed under section 18(1) of the Border Security Force Act 1968. As far as the commission of offence under Section 376/452 RPC is concerned, the authority i. e. the … which a case was registered with the Police Station, Mahore. He was traced at about 1600 Hrs on 29. 5. 1998 alongwith his arms/ammunition by police and arrested for offence under Section 376/452 RPC for committing rape

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … follows:-"16. It has been observed by this Court in Suresh Chandra Chakrabarty v. State of West Bengal(1971) ILLJ 293 SC that charges involving consequences of termination of service must be specific, though a departmental enquiry is not

Union of India and ors. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 8; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 3, 13, 26, 29, 35, 36, 48, 49 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Fundamental Rules - Rule 56

Reported in : AIR2001SC1877; [2001(89)FLR599]; JT2001(4)SC306; 2001LabIC1406; 2001(3)SCALE150; (2001)4SCC309; [2001]2SCR927; 2001(2)SCT1085(SC); 2001(3)SLJ257(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1163

more years but less than 20 years are entitled to pension/pensioner benefits under the relevant provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BSF Act') and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as … surplus, opts for voluntary retirement in accordance with the provisions of Rule 29 these rules. 48. Retirement on completion of 30 years' qualifying service. (1) … General, BSF on 2nd April, 1996 for grant of pensionary benefits. Finally, after receipt of legal notice under Section 80 of CPC, the competent authority passed the following order No. 3563/(PF.RK)/97-Est.II/42328 on 3.5.1997:-'In partial modification of this

B.s. Hari Commandant Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Inquiry Report, the appellant was issued charge sheet dated 04.07.1995 under Sections 40 & 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the “BSF Act”). However, the charges, as laid aforesaid, were dropped. 38. Thereafter, the … 05.04.1995, the local police conducted a search and a few Jerrycans of Acetic Anhydride, a controlled substance under Section 9A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the “NDPS Act”), were … by the appellant (original writ petitioner). Leave was granted vide Order dated 29.08.2014. THE FACTUAL PRISM:3. The appellant joined the Indian Army on 09.02.1964. He

Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001(1)WLN135

of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance … are directed against the judgment dated 18.5.1992 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar, in Sessions Case No. 29/1988 convicting the appellant of the offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 14 to 46, 48, 48(1), 49, 50, 64, 70 and 117; Central Police Act, 1949; Army Regulations; Army Rules; Central Civil Services Pension Rules - Rule 25; Pension Rules - Rules 3 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 311

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

dismissed.34. Petitioner is a Member of the Border Security Force which is a paramilitary force created under the Border Security Force Act, 1968. This Force was part of Central Police Act, 1949. It was given a separate identity as Border Security … of the Force, but also for bringing disrepute to the Force which is an offence in terms of Section 40 of the Act3. Such action had been taken as a follow up on the complaint lodged by

Head Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 107 and 108; Border Security Rules, 1969 - Rule 48; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304 and 304A; Evidence Act - Sections 24

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2585

months from the receipt of the Court order. The respondents defended the vires of the provisions of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and the Border Security Force Rules, 1969 and contended that the same were in accordance with the provisions … the charge-sheet dated 14th May, 1992. The charge-sheet was served on the petitioner for committing civil offence under Section 46 of the BSF Act, i.e. the offence of murder, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal … received an anonymous letter written on 26-10-1991, which had been posted on 29-10-1991, alleging about the murder of Constable Ratna Bhai having been committed by

Union Of India Vs. Jogeshwar Swain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of an offence under Section 40 Civil Appeal Nos. 8629-8630 of 2014 Page 2 of 31 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, “BSF Act, 1968”), that is for committing an act prejudicial to the good order and discipline … found that while preparing the record of evidence, the last statement of the prosecution witnesses was recorded on 29.06.2005 and on the same day, without even giving twenty four hours’ time to the original petitioner to reflect

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the Border Security Force Act and Rules thereunder for the SSFC to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and … accused No.860020697 Const. Rama Kant Shukla of Arty Bat (HQ1011BSF Arty Regt), Charged with: CHARGE - I BSF Act 1968, Section 20 (a) ASSAULTING HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER In that he, at 2100 hrs on 21/6/95 at Gun Area Kanzalawan, … Commandant. His contention is based on his two representations dated 20.4.1994 and 29.6.1994 to the DIG. Copies of the same are annexed as Annexure P1

Pushparajan.C vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

and those cannot stand the scrutiny of law.3. Aggrieved by Ext.P4, the petitioner has invokedSection 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and has preferred Ext.P7 appeal. The petitioner filed Ext.P7 appeal in the month of June, 2022. So far, … Bengal) and on finding guilty, was imposed with the penalty of termination of service.8. The petitioner, thereupon, invoked Section 117(2)of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 and Rule 167(2) of the Border Security Force Rules, 1969, filing … of February, 2023The petitioner states that he is aggrieved by Ext.P4 orderdated 29.03.2022 issued by the 4th respondent-Commandant, 148 Battalion, BSF, Raninagar, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal.2.