Advanced Search Results

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Rule 149 of the BSF Rules, 1969 or by the appellate authority under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. In the said case, the Supreme Court had carefully examined the provisions of Rule 149 of the Border … drawn for convening a Coast Guard Court for trial of the petitioner in terms of Rule 26 and 27 of the Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983. The charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- “(i) FIRST

Prosenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Cour ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Army Rules; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Evidence Act - Sections 32; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226 and 227; Border Security Force Act - Sections 117(2) and 130; Border Security Force Rules; defense Service Regulations

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ856

Matched in: Parties Prosenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Court and ors.

B.V. Ramnarayan Vs. State Bank of India, Hyderabad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Rule 92; Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 11(2)

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT753; (1997)ILLJ1007AP

in the Border Security Force was dismissed from service by the Commandant acting under Section 11(2) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 on the ground that he was a deserter, without holding enquiry. Before the Supreme Court, the questions were … and requested the Regional Manager to grant three months leave as special sick leave with effect from August 27, 1983. On September 13, 1983, the petitioner submitted another letter to the Chief Regional Manager pointing out the

Constable Basavaraj Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 20, 117 and 117(2); Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 311; Border Security Force Rules

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR468]; ILR2005KAR3513

Petitioner from service on the ground that he was found guilty of charge under Section 20(a) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act').2. The Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-(a) to quash the order of dismissal … may deem fit in the circumstances of the case; and(f) to quash the letter bearing No. 20/1342/CC-Misc/2002/724/27 dated 27th February 2002 (Annexure-K).3. The Petitioner is represented by Sri. Jayakumar S. Patil, learned Senior Counsel along with Sri

S.A. Qadir Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)WLN635

the appellant is that mens rea is a necessary ingredient of the offence under Section 40 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968. Section 40 reads:40. Violation of good order and discipline-Any person subject to this Act who is guilty of any … of the same date, petitioner was also informed that the Director General has rejected the statutory petitions dated 27.4.1987 and 1.7.1987 filed by him. The petitioner's statutory representation was rejected by the Central Government and the petitioner

Balwinder Singh Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Border Security Force

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1969 - Rule 53(2) ; Sections 40, 26, 117, 53, 5575

consider the statutory position with regard to persons subjected to the Border Security Force. Section 70 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act hereafter) provides the constitution of a Summary Security Force Court (`SSFC' hereafter). It is permitted under … service by an order passed on 1st June, 1996.4. The petitioner was thereafter served with a communication dated 27th August, 1996 from the Headquarters, 137th Battalion, BSF informing him that the Inspector General, BSF, North Bengal had

Kundan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001(1)WLN135

of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Sections 46, 47, 80 and Section 2 (a) & (d) of Border Security Force Act, 1968, hereinafter referred-to as 'the Act of 1968'. In support of the contention, learned Counsel has heavily placed reliance … of fine to further undergo two year's rigorous imprisonment. Appellant has also been convicted on the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to three year's R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-

Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 35

the Initiating Officer can sufficiently be justified, we dismiss the writ petition but refrain from imposing any costs. Border Security Force Act 1968 - Section 35 - Falsifying official documents and false declarations -- A letter dated 15.04.1993 highlights the poor functioning of … dated 13 Feb”93, Q/7402 dated 24 Feb”93, Q/7406 dated 5/3/93, Q/7407 dated 12/3/93, Q/7402 dated 20/3/93, Q/7409 dated 27/3/93 and Q/7413 dated 4/4/93. It is surprising that enquiry officer has submitted the COI proceeding to this office

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the enquiry was of no legal consequence. Mr. Sinha submitted that there was no power under the Border Security Force Act, 1968 („BSF Act‟) for the BSF to have recorded the so-called confessional statement of the Appellant and it was … 26 of the Evidence Act 1872 („EA‟). The disclosure statement (Ex.PW-2/B) also did not fulfil the requirement under Section 27 of the EA. There was no validity of such confessional statement in the eye of law.27. Countering the

Mohinder Singh Malik and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 9 and 14A; ;Border Security Force (Seniority, Promotion and Superannuation of Officers) (Amendment) Rules, 1998; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ73

dated 27.5.1998, purportingly issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of Section 141 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, Rule 9 of the 1978 Rules was amended so as to provide for the age of superannuation of